Home » 2011 » February (Page 6)

Lisa Renee – Energetic Synthesis Podcast


Lisa Renee – Energetic Synthesis Podcast
from Energetic Synthesis Podcast
Price: USD 0
View Details about Lisa Renee

Palace raises hopes FOI bill will be ‘prioritized’

Strange ride or servitude
Freedom of Information
Image by Paul Jacobson
I attended a privacy and freedom of information on the Internet workshop at the Constitutional Court this last week and here are some photos I took while I was there.

Palace raises hopes FOI bill will be ‘prioritized’
Malacañang on Saturday raised hopes the Freedom of Information bill may yet be certified a priority measure of the Aquino administration – but not necessarily by end-February.
Read more on GMA News

‘FOI law needed now more than ever’
All the bombshells being dropped at congressional inquiries touching on military anomalies show the pressing need for a Freedom of Information (FOI) act, according to advocates of the proposed law.
Read more on Philippine Daily Inquirer

Some nuts think religion is useless: God is non-existence! But it is the only explanation for your being!

Some nuts think religion is useless: God is non-existence! But it is the only explanation for your being!

 

Some nuts think that religion is useless and bad. They proclaim that God does not exist and He is the invention of humans of a Big Someone. No proof for God and no one can see God, therefore, for such imbeciles, God does not exist.

But these confirmed imbeciles forget that without religion there is no other explanation for our life and our death, our lifecycle, for the purpose of human being, for good and evil. There is no other explanation for living and suffering, for living and rejoicing, for desperation and hope.

Without religion how can we have a moral code in accordance with the nature of human being, in accordance with what the creator of man has designed and prescribed for him? How can we understand the object of being, growing, ageing and dying? How can we comprehend our task and modulate our lives accordingly?

But religion is only an invitation for man. It is only an admonition for the human race. It is only a path indicator. Religion leaves for man the ultimate choice of belief and disbelief. It gives all dignity and value as well as freedom of will to man to decide for himself, to choose between the path of God or any other path, the devil for example.

Religion explains to mankind the meaning of their existence, it invites them to believe in God and do good with the consequences of a reckoning in another life where all shall be held responsible for their beliefs, or disbelief, for their good and evil. It tells humans that the power that has put their atoms together can redo it again, at pleasure.

It tells us of the purpose of God for creating humans and how He would try and test them. It tells us about the mystery of our existence and the existence of the universe, our role and our end. It tells us of who has created the universe and created all life manifestations that surrounds us.

It informs us of the good path and the evil one to follow. It tells us how to avoid the evil and bad action and how to perform the good one. It is the only way to avoid evil and do good.

But such an ignorant imbecile does rejects religion for religion was taken as a pretext for crime, murder and all sins, under the Christians, Inquisitions, Crusades. Christians fighting one another in Ireland. Muslims are accused with terrorism and killings.

Such an imbecile cites the cases of the 9/11 and the Bali suicide bombing of a discotheque killing Australian citizens and other westerners.

The accusation is badly taken and is a false accusation directed against religion. No religion teaches hatred and teaches crime and killing.

But being ignorant of religion and religious texts, such idiots assume that religion prescribes such crimes. While religion denies humans committing any crimes, of murder or theft.

The Law prescribes Ten Golden Commandments exactly to avoid any evil doing and promoting what is good. The Gospel is an invitation to all mankind to do good and shun evil. The Qur’anic text is but an admonition to mankind to do good and eschew evil with the consequences awaiting the sinners.

God, is the only deterrent factor in the life of man to do good and avoid evil. If God is not there then man does what he wants. No moral codes, no laws of conduct, no deterrents, and everyone is free to do what he likes, at pleasure.

It is exactly because of this there so many belief systems and so many deities and so many paths to sin and do wrong, so many paths to take and so many deities to worship. Man is given the mind and the freedom to choose for himself and then he shall be held to account for his, or her, own deeds. He is given a short and transitory lifetime and then his return to the creator that has put his atoms together.

If there is no God then every human being is free to kill, murder, massacre, steal and lead his life according to his animal drives. Throughout history we have ample examples of such criminality.

Look at what Napoleon has does of humanity offering sacrifices at the altar of his personal glory, Caligula, Nero, Alexander the Great before them, Hitler, Mussolini, Paul Pot, Stalin, Mao, in our time, only last century, have done to humanity for they were disbelievers atheists, like those imbeciles who are against religion and deny God, they are responsible for the massacre of millions and criminality against humanity. Look at Ben laden what he has done of criminal acts against humanity, and his team of hard and professional religious mafia sowing terror in the world.

But religion is not responsible but those who deny religion and deny God that are responsible. The crusades in the Dark Ages and terrorist acts in our time, are performed by psychopath and distorted criminals that identify themselves with religion, whether Islam, Christianity of Judaism.

Humans take anything as a pretext for their evil doing, to justify massacre, crime, murder and destruction. Humans take any pretext to justify their dominance, power and control over others, individuals or states and people suffer always at their hands.

Such arrogant and ignorant idiots who reject religion and disbelieve in God have no idea of why they are there and cannot possibly explain there own existence except in terms of the absurd and the inutile.

How would such imbeciles, like Hawking  and Darwin, explain their own being and the existence of the universe if there is no God to ordain things?

But man is an ungrateful bastard to his own creator!

Article from articlesbase.com

This debate took place on September 26, 2009, in Newberg, Oregon, between Dan Barker of the Freedom From Religion Foundation and James White of Alpha and Omega Ministries.

US Income Tax is Illegal, IRS is Illegal

May God show us all the straight path, Ameen! The Miracle of the Holy Quran – Dr. Husain Sattar (graduate from University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, MashaAllah, Alhamdulillah) www.sacredlearning.org Science Islam www.scienceislam.com One of the Miracles of the Quran…
Video Rating: 0 / 5

Sponsor: FreeKeene.com – Is public defender putting on a dog and pony show to make Ed Brown’s trial look fair or is a real defense underway? That I don’t know, but I do know he made a listenable opening statement, that he won’t talk to me and that Ed Brown is a jailed tax protester on trial for trying to defend his home during a nine month standoff with Federal authorities. BTW I do not believe they wanted him dead, but I bet Brown thought so. Images and information from http How you can have a Ridley Report ad like the one in this vid: nhunderground.com ed elaine brown plainfield ridleyreport new hampshire tax deniers protesters resisters standoff waco ruby ridge bombs branch davidian feds federal authorities us marshals irs internal revenue service ron paul america: freedom to fascism guns weapons firearms free state project public defender trial court jail prisiondave ridley report reserve michael iacopino

Which is more important—national security against terrorism or protecting the rights?

Question by Lesley G: Which is more important—national security against terrorism or protecting the rights?
Which is more important—national security against terrorism or protecting the rights granted to us in the Constitution?

Best answer:

Answer by DAR
Rights.

He who would give up liberty for temporary safety deserves neither and loses both.

Add your own answer in the comments!

The American Dream and Capitalism – Integral Parts of Our Constitution

It is no accident or manifestation of random luck that the United States is the single greatest economic power ever to grace the planet as a sovereign nation. It is no accident, because our founding fathers had a vision of a nation in which government played a very small role in commerce and an even smaller role in the lives of its citizens. The necessity for a small federal government and independent sovereign states/governments, kept together by a voluntary agreement that became our constitution, was crucial to the success of the country. Our founding fathers knew that it was important to curtail the growth of government and so our founding document’s purpose was to ensure the federal government be kept in check. Three branches of government were introduced and made part of the constitution in order to create a checks an balance on each separate branch of government. Yes, our great nation, the greatest economic power the world has ever known, was made possible by the well thought-out intentions of a few great visionaries so many, many years ago.

John Locke, Adam Smith and Thomas Hobbes, philosophers and economists created the conceptual framework that become interwoven into the Constitution of the United States of America. Our founding fathers embraced their ideas and their principles. Life, liberty and the right to own and keep private property out of the hands of government, were the building blocks of our nation. Freedom for people to govern themselves and the necessity to create a firewall between government and the private sector are constitutional mandates.

The very idea of separating government and the private sector was extraordinary and, yes, intentional. That government must not be allowed to interfere with the private sector (laissez-faire) was, from the outset of our nation, a key ingredient in our founders recipe for creating a new nation, the likes of which the world had never seen. These principles of life, liberty and the right to own and keep private property out of the hands of government are the bedrock of this great nation and are often referred to as the American Dream or Democratic Capitalism. Yes, capitalism. Unfettered capitalism means government cannot interfere with the private sector economy. It was an intentional constitutional mandate.

For a time, this constitutional mandate remained in place. And for a long time, and as a result, America flourished. Then came the Great Depression. The Great Depression changed everything. It opened the door for governmental control and interference with the private sector economy. Once that door was cracked open, governmental legislators (our employees) plowed through the door and forced upon us a flood of bureaucratic tyranny (numerous, repressive laws), not seen since the English monarchy attempted to flex its might in an effort to reign in the thirteen colonies at the end of the 18th century.

Contrary to what many believe, the Great Depression was not caused by the stock market crash of 1929. While this crash was certainly devastating to the economy at the time, it was not the cause of the worst economic event in U.S. history. Rather, it was the government’s interference in the private sector that brought about a recession that became a depression. The Smoot-Hawley Act was intended to protect the livelihoods of American farmers by imposing importation restrictions on agricultural products coming from foreign nations. As soon as the private sector got wind of this legislation, even in proposed form, it reacted violently and the stock market crashed in 1929. But then, Smoot-Hawley hit a bump in the legislative road and, thinking this legislation would die on the vine, the stock market rallied and commerce re-started itself. But Smoot-Hawley was not dead. It re-emerged and became law in 1930. Once again the stock market plummeted. To make matters worse, President Hoover, proposed, and Congress passed, legislation that created one of the largest tax increases in the nation’s history; an increase in the federal income tax rate from 25% to 63%. Included in this tax increase was a tax on checks. Every check that was drafted was subjected to an excise tax. Not surprisingly, consumers reverted to the use of cash, instead of checks, in an effort to avoid the excise tax they could ill-afford. Runs on the banks began to increase and by FDR’s election in 1933, banks were all but broke and the financial system was in ruins.

FDR, one the most activist of Presidents, saw this as an opportunity to experiment with a new economic concept, known as Keynesian Economics. Keynesian economics argued that in times of an economic downturn, the federal government, though spending measures, could help re-start the economic engine. FDR was a fanatical Keynesian. Law after law was passed creating knew, novel ways to spend our way out of the recession. None succeeded. After ten years of Keynesian economics, the U.S. unemployment rate stood fast at 13%. The Keynesian economic experiment failed and it failed miserably.

Now lets fast forward to October 1987 when, for reasons still unknown, the stock market crashed once again. Ronald Reagan was our President at the time. The year before, 1986, saw the tax cuts he had signed into legislation become the law of the land. How did Reagan react to this crash? He didn’t. He believed the U.S. economy would heal itself and that the newly enacted tax cuts would eventually create an economic boom. Limited government intervention was his response to the 1987 crash. Reagan, it turns out, was spot on. His laissez-faire-Adam Smith approach to the 1987 crash allowed our capitalist economic system to correct itself and the byproduct of his great leadership was an economic boom that lasted almost sixteen years. It is too bad we did not elect a Ronald Reagan in 2009. No doubt his response to the 2008 economic collapse would have been to cut taxes, reduce government spending and get government out of the way of the private sector. No need to experiment with Keynsian economics, as the Reagan model for economic recovery was a tried and true one. But Reagan was not elected. Instead a President bent on re-defining America into the European model, was elected and Keynsian economic experiment was, once again, dusted off and brought into the American economic laboratory. There is little doubt to many true Americans that another try at big government interference with our free market will fail once again.

Then came along the Scott Brown election. The election of Scott Brown was a repudiation of big government, plain and simple. Most Americans believe government is the problem and not the solution. We believe as long as the government stays out of our way, we can prosper as a nation. We do not subscribe to socialist principles. We do not believe in the European Dream. We embrace, instead, the American Dream.

Tom is a Certified Public Accountant, a Certified Financial Planner, Author, Professional Speaker and Financial Self-Help Guru. Tom’s groundbreaking financial self-help book, “Rich Habits” (order at: www.richhabits.net), has received 5 star reviews on Amazon.

Article from articlesbase.com

One senator disqualified, another acquitted

One senator disqualified, another acquitted
The Constitution Court on Friday handed down two separate decisions on job qualifications of senators Itthiphon Ruangworaboon and Paiboon Nititawan. In the first case, the high court ruled that Itthiphon violated a ban for family members concurrently holding political office.
Read more on The Nation – Thailand’s English news

U.S. says Article 9 limits close defense cooperation
WASHINGTON (Kyodo) Article 9 of the Constitution and Tokyo’s interpretation of it restrict close defense cooperation between Japan and the United States, a recent U.S. congressional report says. According to the “The U.S.-Japan Alliance,” a report compiled Jan. 18 by the Congressional Research Service of the Library of Congress, in a situation involving North Korea, the Self-Defense Forces could …
Read more on The Japan Times

Marijuana and our Freedom of Religion

What does Freedom of Religion have to do with smoking marijuana? Find out here. It is unconstitutional to prohibit smoking marijuana in a religious ceremony where that religion practices it.
Video Rating: 5 / 5

Latest National Security News

QR National to slash workforce
QR National employees worried about job security will demand answers to a plan to offer 3500 staff voluntary redundancies at a meeting on Thursday.The company, which generated $ 4.6 billion for the Queensland …
Read more on Yahoo!7 Finance

Security experts discuss global terrorism
Manesar, Haryana, Feb 9 : Security experts from across the country and abroad discussed multi-disciplinary and intelligence-based approach to deal with the global terrorism.
Read more on New Kerala

Govt committed to tabling Food Security Bill in Par soon: PM
New Delhi, Feb 10 (PTI) Prime Minister Manmohan Singh today said the government is committed to tabling the National Food Security Bill in Parliament soon to provide a legal guarantee for cheaper rice and wheat to the poor.”We are committed to bringing before Parliament soon the Right to Food Act…,” Singh said after inaugurating a conference of US think-tank International Food Policy Research …
Read more on PTI via Yahoo! India News

Q&A: Does the Freedom of Information act and the Patriot Act impact police records?

Question by defenderinfaith: Does the Freedom of Information act and the Patriot Act impact police records?
If I am trying to retrieve police records on a closed case, does the freedom of information and patriot acts come into play? Is there a fee that I need to pay to get copies of the reports? Is there something else I need to bring to get a copy?

Best answer:

Answer by michman
You can get a copy of case records, just have the case# with you, and there is a fee.

What do you think? Answer below!