I just finish watching a super cool video that reveals an awesome method to rake in crazy affiliate income… upto 32.85 per day
Its called Freedom Blogging Profit. Freedom Blogging Profit will reveal the best kept secrets to make money from blogging with viral free traffic from Facebook. No one has taught this before, and we believe we have the newest and unique techniques that your visitors will be extremely interested. Recently there are a lot of course teaching how to get traffic from Facebook by PPC, but our course is totally different. We will reveal how to make easy money from massive amount of free traffic from Facebook and how to monetize this secret traffic by blogging.
There are several different blogs that may utilize Freedom Blogging Profit system. They are the following:
Personal weblog – this would be the most well-known type of weblog utilized in a few of this friendly hub in the net. That is defined as the on-line diary or journal, where you are able to publish your poem and other literature piece.
Topic blog – in Freedom Blogging Profit it focuses across the function like a few of the major search engines like Google present now. Some writers who want to jot down about something unknown can use it.
Science weblog – it will be the mode used to disseminate information and information. However, scientists only use this mode for easy scientific data and information because they believe that it could harm the credibility of their science as many individuals can study it.
Collaborative weblog – this sort of weblog using Freedom Blogging Profit strategies is written by two or much more writers. Specific website is open for all of the writers to jot down together with others.
Educational blog – that is used by students to record the things they discovered from their teacher like the actions applied in each day.
Forum blog – it functions as an internet forum and great for Freedom Blogging Profit. It permits two or more bloggers to publish discussion on the web.
There are lots of web-based weblog journals in Freedom Blogging Profit system available online. You are able to post your own blog, too. Anybody can begin composing a blog. In several cases, it is completely free. How can you start making a blog?
You can weblog in private and public regardless which system of Freedom Blogging Profit you choose. Many weblog site provide a weblog that contains a password, only a few can read your blog. You can also post a weblog that can be study by anyone. You can publish your own weblog and post it afterwards. By sending the URL to your pals, you are able to now publish your individual weblog.
This involves a super powerful viral traffic generation method that is totally free and can help your leads to monetize any blogs, websites or anything that can make your leads good affiliate money. There are 2 main modules in the course: Free Viral Facebook Traffic — Facebook now officially gets more traffic from Google Reported by CNN. And Blogging Secrets, this module shows you how to really kick your competition and get targeted traffic with god conversions. There are blueprints with over 150 pages, workbooks, videos and huge bonuses. Only the most advanced techniques will be shared.
A common question that people ask in insurance circles is regarding what constitutes adequate insurance coverage. It is an understandable question, seeing the number of insurance products that the average person shopping for insurance policy is likely to be presented with by the insurance vendors – followed by a pitch meant to make every product look essential. All insurance products, of course, cost money – and many people, in the spirit of financial prudence would naturally rather not spend money on insurance products that they really don’t need. At the same time, while being financially prudent with the money they spend on insurance premiums, many of us are wary of spending too little (and thereby buying up too little coverage), resulting in inadequate benefits on the occurrence of the risky event we are insuring against.
So what really constitutes adequate insurance coverage?
Well, the answer as to what really constitutes adequate insurance coverage will vary from person to person- but the constant which holds in all cases is that ‘adequate insurance coverage is that which allows for reasonable peace of mind.’
While some of us purchase insurance because it is a statutory requirement in some cases (like in the case of motor vehicle insurance), or because it is fashionable (if everyone at the office is buying it), the real prudent reason that anyone should invest in insurance policy is the peace of mind that having insurance coverage offers. And in the same spirit, adequate insurance coverage is that in which you can have adequate peace of mind in knowing that you (or your family) are adequately covered in the event of whatever risk the policy covers actually taking place.
In the case of life insurance, for instance, adequate coverage can only be described as that in which the person taking it can live with the peace of mind of knowing that their loved ones will be adequately provided for (with money from the policy) in the event of them (the policyholders) passing away at some point.
And in the case of medical insurance, adequate coverage can only be described as that which gives the person taking it the peace of mind of knowing that should any form of illness befall them, they can be sure of getting the best medical attention possible, without financial limitations coming on the way to getting such attention.
In this discussion, it is important to note that not every insurance coverage package on the market offers complete peace of mind. In a bid to offer ‘affordable’ products, insurance companies are often forced to cut down on the levels of benefits they offer – sometimes translating into levels of coverage that realistically speaking, don’t guarantee much peace of mind, as the policyholder is really only ‘halfway covered.’ It is therefore essential to go through an insurance policy’s fine print – to see the real benefits it offers and whether they present real peace of mind – before investing in it. Bad Credit credit cards
Bad Credit credit cards
In the author box write this, Ryan likes writing about Bad Credit credit cards . He/she has more article about (anchor text) at his/her website.
Reply back if there is any question.
If you can put the URLs in the articles, that would be better. If not put it in the resource box.
Question by Wolf reborn: what makes Americans think they have more freedom?
I have visited Finland more than once in my life i have also visited a few other nations as well and I’ve realized that although they don’t have a bill of rights saying they have the same rights as Americans more often than not they have more freedoms, I am now becoming a legal citizen of Finland or rather I’m becoming a full citizen(i have no idea whether i ever had dual citizenship or not) and I enjoy many of the same freedoms as any american plus many more.
where do Americans get the idea that they have the most freedom?
Answer by djsderek I dont think its that we think we have the most because most first world countries have about the same amount of freedom. But we deffinatley have more then most.
BOOKLOCKER.COM “New Release” challenges traditional biblical theologies!!
(PRWEB) November 25, 1999
“Beyond Religion” by Alexander Penman is an inspirational work that challenges traditional biblical theologies. This is done by defining and validating faith without religious discrimination and by establishing that where the welfare of the human soul is concerned, religion has never been the issue.
On the subject of faith, this book offers reconciliation between people of different religions, and between the religious and non-religious. It presents the case that all faith is valid, regardless of whether or not the ÂsupposedÂ correct religion has been adopted.
“Beyond Religion” is entirely based upon a “law of love” that is found within the pages of the Bible. This law has never been properly understood, therefore religion has become the issue, replacing faith and love.
Beyond Religion examines theological mistakes that have been made throughout history because of a failure to understand this one crucial law. It demonstrates that when this law is added to the equation, the Bible ceases to be a collection of books full of contradictions and instead becomes a collection of books worthy of a God.
Beyond Religion is dedicated to every caring person who has ever, or will ever live.
Occasionally, indeed rarely, a book of great magnitude crosses my desk. A book with such depth is the subject of this review. BEYOND RELIGION “…presents religion as being the creation of people as opposed to an instrument of God.” Author Alexander Penman has given us a new and refreshing look at the bible…and the law of love.
Mr. Penman presents the case that bible-based religions “…can become a very powerful force that can control the actions of people. Very seldom does the result of this control have anything to do with the love of God.” Stated another way “…people are not automatically religious simply because they believe in God. This is true because every human being possesses a quality called ‘faith’.”
Thus, non-religious people could believe in God every bit as much as religious people do, and their faith would be every bit as valid. Beyond that, man’s law which sometimes nullifies biblical teachings, would be set aside, or as Mr. Penman quotes Jesus, “You have a fine way of setting aside the commandments of God in order to observe your own traditions.”
The purpose of the bible is to expose God’s word, and God’s word identifies good verses evil. That differentiation is known as love. Not crusades. Not inquisitions. Not witch-hunts. And, according to Alexander Penman, not belief systems that force us into religious conclusions.
BEYOND RELIGION speaks of a law the offers freedom, not shackles. “This law was established for the salvation of every human being who has ever cared.” And this law is administered by God, not man. Alexander Penman has given us a book people will still turn to a hundred years from now.
Richard Fuller, Senior Editor (http://www.metarev.com)
Digital communications in conjunction with the use of the modern internet have grown exponentially to the point that to communicate digitally has become an indispensable facet of everyday life. From cellphones, to netbooks to email, blogs and online portals, the transfer and exchange of electronic data controls the way many interact with each other and communicate both personally and for business. Now with the current trend moving towards “cloud” computing where all a persons or companies keep important documents stored and accessed online or in the “cloud”, cyber security has now become the number priority of many.
Methods to protect data as encryption, antivirus software, firewalls, and access passwords have been around long before the modern day data revolution, but unfortunately none of such have grown as effective security solutions to accommodate the modern day modes of digital communication. Devices which can connect to the global data network or Internet, have become increasingly smaller and more intelligent. For example with just a modern cellphone, a person can access their email, post updates to blogs, and access personal or corporate documents all through the internet.
The typical security approach in the past has been based on the model to restrict access using firewall systems or detect intrusions as viruses using signature based scanning systems. All such solutions are based upon the concept to restrict, channel, hide and limit access to data. A firewall, for example, borrows its name from “fire retardent walls” which are designed to create safe areas where fire cannot pass because of the material from which they are constructed. In this case any external access that has not been deemed necessary to an internal or public network is considered fire and simply blocked. Antivirus solutions and the Virus signature model have also proven inadequate because of the turn around time required to update signature files and the amount of resources such systems use to scan 1000’s of files. It is like the concept of sending the police to everyones house in a city of millions of people to try and find where the bad guys are hiding. With modern computers containing several 1000 files, and the ever changing almost polymorphic nature of modern viruses, the signature based scanning model no longer is practical.
The problems with the current approaches, is with the increasingly widespread use of digital networks, there has never been any method in which to dynamically update firewalls or signature databases to accommodate for new types of access and threats. Almost daily there are new applications which are constantly becoming necessary for people to effectively gain access to digital services and equally new threats. The current security model was never meant to be a solution that determines quickly between good activity and bad. In fact it restricts the freedom of the entire group to protect from the potential threats of a few. A truly useful security system has to be able to allow and maintain access to the group and then only limiting or denying access to those activities that are out of line with the established norm of operations.
Each security technique brings with it a cost of ownership and generally firewalls, antivirus software, VPN networks, and access control methods serve more to limit access to modern day digital networks than actually protect them. System administrators and corporate IT security directors can no longer feasibly follow the restrict everything model since in the end they are merely restricting legitimate access and extremely limiting the ability of their users to take full advantage of the digital information revolution and doing little to prevent actual “hackers” or unauthorized access to their networks.
A truly effective cyber security solution has to be as dynamic and flexible as the score of every changing applications and digital services and digital access devices being used. It is no longer a feasible model to restrict everything, or scan everything, as this only serves to hinder users from taking advantage of the increased productivity and power brought by the modern digital networks and internet and is a tremendous use of computing resources.
The cybersecurity security model for data networks can defined as something which protects data and data systems by denying access to unauthorized users, preventing downtime of authorized services by unauthorized activities (Denial of Service attacks), and preserving the overall functional state of health of a digital network at 99%.
1)Protecting of data and data systems from unauthorized access
As more and more information is being stored online as financial information, credit card numbers, classified documents and information that cannot fall into unauthorized hands, data protection is the top concern of cybersecurity. Unfortunately there have been many famous security breaches of important data as millions of credit numbers stolen, to theft of corporate trade secrets and even concerns of foreign countries retrieving national security information by the use of trojans and other intrusion methods.
Methods for intrusion include
The installing of backdoor network intrusion applications hidden in or disguised as legitimate applications that enter inside a network by authorized users inadvertently opening infected emails or websites.
Brute force attacks, where common user names and weak passwords are exploited by systems that try millions of combinations of username, password sets to gain access.
Exploits in operating systems as Microsoft windows that allows a secure or authorized service to be exploited by found flaws in the softwares design.
Theft or breach of internal networks by employees or persons normally authorized with allowed access to the systems, or who hold access to certain areas where by internal snooping they are able to find passwords and authcodes to secure areas. (Notes left on desks, computers left logged in to secure areas.
Exposing of data to external breach by placing documents on USB pendrives and laptops in order to present such data in meetings outside of the network. Many times employees place a document on a USB pen that is for a presentation at a remote location, but they happen to also have secure documents unrelated to the current meeting which got left on their USB. Then they place their pen drive in a third party computer in order to present 1 document, not knowing that particular computer has a trojan which quickly copies all of the data on their USB to an unauthorized 3 party location.
2)Preventing downtime of authorized services by unauthorized activities
Brute force attacks, scanners and denial of service attacks can cause a network, its servers and main access routers, to be brought down to the point that the network is no longer usable in any form. Such attacks cause considerable damage and downtime to networks on a daily basis. The ability to detect such attacks and cut them off at the source farthest away from the core network and its services is very important to the overall health of a strong cybersecurity program.
3) Preserving the overall functional state of health of a digital network.
Preserving the health of a digital network is not just in the prevention of attacks and unauthorized activity but also in the preservation of core services and data access that its authorized users depend upon. It is not a viable solution to stop an attack or prevent potential attacks by also preventing or limiting authorized access. A cybersecurity solution has to be able to isolate and prevent attacks and breaches to its integrity by at the same time not limiting or denying access to its resources by authorized users.
It is clear from the many different ways that security can be breached in data networks, and the overwhelming dependence on such networks that the current security methods are not only no longer adequate to protect such networks, but themselves serve to further cause more security problems and network access issues. As such an urgent need has arisen to change the current mode of approach to cybersecurity and create a new dynamic model that is able to constantly adapt to the ever changing needs to protecting data networks.
A new IDS model must be created that has to adhere to the following goals:
The goal of any IDS system must be to preserve the integrity of the network in which it protects and allow such network to function in its ideal operating state at 99.99%.
An IDS system must be lightweight and dynamically deployed. An IDS system cannot itself become another intrusion and must not break the first rule by comprising the networks integrity in using too much computing and network resources in its attempts to protect the network.
An IDS system must be able to constantly adapt to an ever changing environment and self update its own signature records based on evolving threats. An IDS system must not require extensive hands on resources to constantly update its signature files and require manual verification that the threats it detected are actual and not false
An IDS system has to be able to simultaneously protect the network against attacks, unauthorized use and downtime, without preventing nor limiting network access and use of network resources to authorized clients. As such it must be unobtrusive at all times and preserve the network in an open state where its core services and resources are 99.99% available to the networks authorized users while detecting, isolating and preventing unauthorized activity.
Truly only research in proactive defense mechanisms will hold usefulness in protecting the digital networks of now and in the future.
DemocracyNow.org – Libyan rebels have consolidated their grip on the capital of Tripoli by capturing Col. Muammar Gaddafi’s main compound, but the whereabouts of the Libyan leader remain unknown and he has vowed his forces would resist “the aggression with all strength” until either victory or death. Reporters in Tripoli say heavy gunfire could still be heard nearby the area of the Rixos hotel where dozens of international journalists guarded by heavily armed Gaddafi loyalists are unable to leave. The Arab league said on Tuesday it will meet this week to consider giving Libyan rebels the country’s seat at the league, after it was taken away a few months ago from the Gaddafi government. Today Britain’s National Security Council is meeting to to discuss unfreezing Libyan assets to financially assist the National Transitional Council. Democracy Now! speaks with Gilbert Achcar, a professor at the School of Oriental and African Studies in London. For the complete transcript, to download the podcast, or for more Democracy Now! reports on the conflict in Libya, visit www.democracynow.org FOLLOW DEMOCRACY NOW! ONLINE: Facebook: www.facebook.com Twitter: @democracynow Subscribe on YouTube: www.youtube.com Daily Email News Digest: www.democracynow.org Please consider supporting independent media by making a donation to Democracy Now! today, visit www.democracynow.org Video Rating: 4 / 5
This guy won’t show his face in public in America anymore without 100 secret service agents protecting him. George Bush is a criminal and the whole world knows it. Why is this guy not in a cell for the rest of his life for 9/11? For Iraq? For the engineered collapse of the American economy and loss of 40% of global wealth? For serial killing a million people? Bush did a better job killing Iraq than Charles Manson could have came up with. A sociopathic psychotic serial killer criminal that could not stop lying as he was stealing all your wealth and sacrificing his own troops for personal profit off the corruption. Put George Bush, and Obama his vetted warlord euro-puppet in a prison cell, save the world and America from all the madness. That would be “Change” you can count on. A fair trial for the people that did 9/11 in front of ALL the world. Trial for Hillary, trial for Guiliani, trial for Bush. All criminals that have rejected their oath of office and rejected the constitution which is THE law of America. Reject the constitution as an elected official? Your a criminal, defined in the constitution. Video Rating: 0 / 5
After recent experiences and awareness’s in my life and also from what is happening it the public domain, I felt it was right to talk about my views and understandings of these two incredibly important areas of life.
On one side we have a great need to feel safe and on the other side we want to be free. However, as our need to be safe is so strong, our freedom is often compromised in the process. And it is easy to see which one of these usually takes precedence in our own life.
The need to feel safe could be described as our egos main priority. With the ego operating from around the stomach area, this is where our survival fears are and is also said to be the oldest part of the brain.
When I think about the need or wish for freedom, I see it as a calling from the heart. I would also describe it as a higher, more evolved side of the human experience, as it is not essential to our own survival. So although we might have the longing for freedom, our body will still function without it.
Better To Be Safe Than Sorry?
The question is, how does our own ego decide what is safe and what isn’t? And might it be acting out of past experiences and old information? Might we also fear freedom at an unconscious level?
So while the ego is doing this incredible job of keeping us alive, the information it often uses to asses whether something is safe or not is coming from our history. So as one reflects on this, it is easy to see that we might well be living in fear in the present moment not because of what is currently happening, but because of old memories and associations that are being triggered.
And as the result of holding onto these old experiences and patterns, we might also be interpreting present situations in such a way that they comply with old experiences, when in reality they might have nothing to do with it.
Trust Or Control?
So as the ego has such a great need to be safe, this naturally creates a life where just about every part of it is created to correspond to what our own ego perceives as being safe.
And then we have the kind of life that Bill Murray had in ground hog day; where the same things keep showing up and these are not always what we want to happen to us.
This can include our relationships, health, self image and many other areas. Whether these things make us feel empowered or disempowered, they exist because our mind perceives there existence as being what is safe for us.
And even though there is an association of safety, it doesn’t mean they are functional or like I said above empowering to us, as familiar is safe to our mind.
After looking at the nature of the mind; the importance of being conscious and questioning what we perceives as safe, starts to surface.
Although the ego is controlling by its very nature, the heart is more delicate and subtle in its workings. Our ego also allows one to be an individual to have an experience that is unique to them; the problems arise when we fall completely into this and think we are separate and therefore alone.
The more we include and live from our heart the more we will begin to trust our life and that we our not separate or isolated beings.
The more we question our own mind and the perceptions we have, the more we will begin to attract what empowers us and not just what is familiar.
However, questioning and observing our own mind is not something that is usually taught or encouraged today. This can cause us to become identified with our ego, to lose our ability to observe and as a consequence become a slave to our own mind.
We then just become a machine and a person that has no control or awareness of themselves. Of course we might develop materialistically, however when it comes to our mental and emotional health we could be primitive in nature.
What Is Freedom?
Today there is a lot of talk of governments and similar figures offering us freedom and such things. Even cars and the latest phones are associating there products with freedom. And I believe to some degree or another they do give a certain amount of freedom.
But what is freedom? Is it something we can receive from others or is it something we create ourselves? And are we responsible for our own freedom?
By living in a society or culture that encourages us to identify with our mind, it is easy to see how our freedom is going and will continue to disappear. If our own ability to be conscious and to question has been eroded, which leads us to live completely in our body, and then it is no surprise that safety continues to be the choice.
When we are filled with fear and overpowered by emotions, there is not much chance of our critical abilities being utilised.
And as a result of this we will quite easily give away our own freedom all to the promise of someone else giving us safety. So ultimately we end up living in survival mode, our own conscious potential being momentarily arrested.
If our own mind is filled by emotions and thoughts from our past, it is hard to see how we can feel freedom at all.
If our own mind is interpreting what is safe based on what is familiar from our past, could it be that our own attachment to our past is causing us present problems? And that the present moment is constantly clouded by our past?
This to me shows how important it is for us as individuals to take responsibility for our projections, to see what we are responsible for and what we are not.
This is why I believe that experiencing real freedom, which could be classed as freedom of the mind, is an evolved and a higher level of consciousness. If we are controlled by our fears, our emotions or our thoughts, it won’t matter how much external freedom we might have.
I hope I have explained each aspect enough. My main intention here is that this has made you think and question, regardless of whether you agree with what I say or not.
My name is Oliver Cooper, I been have been interested in this area for over seven years and I have just started to express my current understanding with these writings. One of my aims is to be a catalyst to others, as other people have been to me.
Michigan Lawmaker to Launch Effort to Amend Gay Marriage Constitutional Ban in Michigan
Undoubtedly we are experiencing an ever-growing trend towards acceptance of the LGBT community as citizens with equal rights. President Obama recently signed a presidential memorandum authorizing special benefits for same-sex partners of federal workers. He indicated that it was a means of ensuring “competitiveness” with the private sector for the countries’ most talented professionals. Many LGBT members of society believe this is a pretense for what this new measure really is: a thank you for the gay community’s support in the 2008 Presidential election. Whatever it is, it certainly sends a signal to the states that if anything, the government is becoming more accepting of gays, lesbians, transgenders and bisexual citizens. This trend arguably began in the ‘60s with the Civil Rights movement but no one can deny the impact of the US Supreme Court’s decision decriminalizing homosexual sexual acts in Lawrence v Texas which overruled Bowers v Hardwick. The US Supreme Court in 2003 reversed the Court’s ruling just 16 years earlier on due process grounds. Citing the 14th Amendment’s Due Process Clause, the Court said in its 6-3 ruling that states cannot punish homosexual couples for engaging in sex acts that are legal for heterosexuals.
Homosexual couples currently can marry in Massachusetts, Connecticut and Iowa and will be allowed to marry in Vermont starting in September 2009 and in New Hampshire from January 2010. Other states offer same-sex unions that grant many of the same rights as marriage.
Forty-two U.S. states explicitly prohibit gay marriage, including 29 with constitutional amendments, according to Human Rights Campaign, a gay rights advocacy group. Michigan is one of them. However, public opinion in Michigan is slowly swaying towards the acceptance of gay marriage.
Speaker Pro Tempore and Michigan House of Representative District 52 Pam Byrnes is set to announce at the 2009 Michigan Pride rally at the Capitol the launch of an effort to amend the Michigan Constitution to allow gay marriage. The proposed amendment would repeal the marriage amendment approved by voters in 2004 which reserved marriage exclusively for unions of one man and one woman, and replace it with specific authorization for gay and lesbian marriage rights. Byrnes was motivated to launch this new initiative after seeing the results of a recent poll which was first reported June 7 in the Detroit Free Press which indicated Michigan voters have become more favorable to the idea of same sex unions since the marriage amendment was approved in 2004, states Pam Byrnes, D-Chelsea.
The poll referenced by Byrnes showed considerable support for gay-friendly policies, but less than a majority (46.5%) in favor of gay marriage. The ballot proposal endorsing traditional marriage was approved 58%-42%, demonstrating more than 4% more support for gay-friendly initiatives today than in 2004.
Ms. Marrs is a 1992 graduate of the University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point with a degree in Business Administration and a minor in Economics. She received her law degree from Thomas M Cooley in 1998. Ms. Marrs practices in the areas of bankruptcy including adversary proceedings. http://www.marrsterryfamilylaw.com
Henley-Putnam University Webinar Series to Examine the Effects of 9/11, Past and Future
San Jose, CA (PRWEB) August 18, 2011
Henley-Putnam University’s next free webinar, “A Decade of Developments in Strategic Security,” (https://www2.gotomeeting.com/register/668887482) will take an in-depth look at important changes and significant advancements in the multi-faceted field of strategic security in the past ten years since September 11, 2001.
On Thursday, August 25th, Henley Putnam University faculty and advisory board members will discuss significant changes in their respective fields of intelligence management, terrorism and counter terrorism, and strategic security and protection management.
The University will tap into the wealth of knowledge and expertise currently on staff. Speakers will include:
Greg Schneider, internationally recognized security and counter terrorism specialist, former security analyst under world renowned terrorism expert Prof. Yonah Alexander, and former career soldier with the elite Israel Defense Forces, involved in counter terrorism missions as well as the protection of national security assets.
Dr. Robin Thompson, former federal Special Agent with the Air Force Office of Special Investigations assigned to AFOSI HQs, first responder to the Pentagon crash site and currently the Lead Counterintelligence Special Agent for NASA at the Langley Research Center.
Lieutenant Colonel David Lon Walker, US Army Military Police Corps, former commander of the 385th Military Police Battalion in Stuttgart Germany, former Department of Defense Liaison Officer to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms in Washington, DC and former chief of police.
This esteemed panel of experienced individuals will be led in the webinar discussion by Moderator, Joe McDonald, who has an extensive background in many aspects of the security profession, including overseeing and conducting vulnerability assessments of critical federal and state infrastructure, and ensuring the protection of those infrastructures. Mr. McDonald serves on the Nevada Homeland Security Commission, Committee on Critical Infrastructure Protection. He also has experience in law enforcement as a contract special investigator to various federal agencies. Mr. McDonald is currently on the Board of Directors for ASIS International, the preeminent organization for security professionals.
“Henley-Putnam University was founded after ten years of arduous planning and research, and before the tragic events of September 11th, 2001,” stated Jim Killin, the University’s CEO. “In the post-9/11 era, security and protection concerns have risen to unprecedented levels. There’s an increased focus on physical security and intelligence-gathering on a local, state and national level in order to secure and protect personnel, data and facilities from terrorist attacks, workplace violence and other security threats. This trend has greatly increased the demand for intelligence, counterterrorism, and protection personnel in both the public and private sectors. It has never been more important that those professionals have the very best training available.”
“Violent extremism is a complicated challenge for the United States,” said President Obama in his White House paper, ‘Empowering Local Partners to Prevent Violent Extremism in the United States,’ released August 3, 2011. Moderator Joe McDonald commented, “In that light, I’m pleased to be working with Henley-Putnam University, which maintains a sole focus on strategic security, and educates tomorrow’s professionals in the identification and deterrence of terrorist attacks and other threats to our nation’s security.”
The second webinar to be held Sept 15, will continue with this topic but it will be forward looking. The panel will discuss their own opinions and predictions of what to look for in the coming years.
The Webinar, A Decade of Developments in Strategic Security, will take place on August 25th, 2011 at 1:00 PM, EDT. Those interested in participating in the webinar can register at https://www2.gotomeeting.com/register/668887482. The webinar is open to the public and completely free of charge.
The Henley-Putnam webinar series, launched in 2009, was designed to bring the hands-on experience of former members of the CIA, Secret Service, FBI, and intelligence and federal law enforcement community to those seeking careers in Strategic Security.
Past webinars are archived on Henley-Putnam’s university’s web site and accessible at http://www.henley-putnam.edu/594-238.htm
The series is one of many career resources offered by Henley-Putnam University. In addition, the University’s mentoring program assigns degree students with a high-level faculty or expert mentor to support them in making career decisions. Through its online career portal, Henley-Putnam helps students research careers, explore university programs, prepare for a job search, locate employers and gain basic knowledge of the Strategic Security field.
ABOUT HENLEY-PUTNAM UNIVERSITY
Founded in August 2001, Henley-Putnam University is a leading educational institution specializing in the field of Strategic Security. The University offers accredited online Bachelor and Master of Science Degrees in Intelligence Management, Terrorism and Counterterrorism Studies, and Strategic Security and Protection Management; a Doctoral Degree in Strategic Security; and several certificate programs. Henley-Putnam’s strategic security curriculum includes a unique focus on deterrence and prevention, preparing students with the skill set to foresee and avert potential threats. Henley-Putnam prepares law enforcement, military, intelligence, and private industry professionals with the networks, skills, and insights to advance in their careers and protect the future. Henley-Putnam University, which is committed to building a student and alumni network that will serve its community, is an accredited member of DETC (http://www.detc.org) and offers 125 courses taught by hands-on faculty members from all branches of the military and law enforcement fields, including the FBI, CIA, DoD, DIA and Secret Service. For more information, visit the Henley-Putnam University website (http://www.Henley-Putnam.edu), email AdmissionsAdvising(at)Henley-Putnam(dot)edu, or call 888.852.8746.
The Constitution Party’s new, upgraded website, http://www.constitutionparty.com, is being launched today.
The Constitution Party is the only political party that stands on the principles of the American founding. It is 100% pro-life, against same-sex “marriage”, so-called free trade, pro-gun, pro-10th amendment, pro-American sovereignty, anti-globalist, and against illegal immigration.
The Constitution Party was founded in 1992 under the name U.S. Taxpayers Party and is now the 3rd largest party in the country in terms of voter registration. It has run candidates for the presidency and various lesser offices every year since its founding. It achieved ballot access for its presidential candidate in 21 states in 1992, 39 states in 1996, and 41 states in 2000.
National Party Chairman James N. Clymer said “The Constitution Party is a haven and a fortress for conservatives who have discerned how the Republican establishment has betrayed conservative principles over and over again and will continue to do so. It is also a beacon of hope for old-style Democrats and independents who are pro-national defense, anti-abortion, and strongly opposed to the de-industrialization of America.
In this election year the Constitution Party will be running candidates for the presidency, the U.S. Congress, and state and local offices.
The Constitution Party believes that this is the year many Americans will be persuaded that their vote is the currency of their conscience and that they must vote for what they truly believe, rather than wasting their vote on the “lesser of two evils”.
The time for “business-as-usual” is over. The two major parties are irreparably compromised, morally, and philosophically, and Americans must reject their policies and any other course that ensures our country’s continuing decline and eventual ruin.