Home » Archive by category "Freedom of Information" (Page 19)

Deteriorating Police Relations Caused by the Freedom of Information Act

As a result of the Freedom of Information Act, police are finding it harder to get the information they need from various companied and organisation.

A local security office of a telephone company referred an illegal telephone call case to an FBI resident agency. However, the company refused to furnish any data concerning the principals involved in the violation without a subpoena for telephone company records.

The resident office of the DEA in a southern state reported that Western Union in their area now refuses to divulge any information except by subpoena which cites the specific information in question.

A west coast telephone company informed the U.S. Secret Service that whenever the company releases information about a nonpublished number, they will immediately notify the subscriber that an inquiry was made and who made the inquiry. Consequently, agents must now decide whether to obtain the information and thus alert the subscriber, or not use this important investigative tool.

A forged U.S. Treasury check was used to pay a telephone bill. The telephone company supervisor refused to furnish U.S. Secret Service Agents with any information about the individual who negotiated the check or the telephone account involved. Although the U.S. Secret Service Agent pointed out that the telephone company was a victim in this case, the company refused to furnish any data without a court order. The Secret Service Agent said that this information would not have been withheld prior to enactment of the Freedom of Information Act.

In the field of arson investigations, major insurance companies and the Fire Marshal Reporting Service have stated they will provide no information to federal law enforcement agencies except under subpoena. They advise their legal departments believe this position is necessary for protection against civil suit, in the event of an Freedom of Information Act disclosure.

In a Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations investigation involving numerous subjects in an arson-for-profit scheme in which insurance companies are defrauded after the insured property is burned, at least 15 insurance companies, numerous insurance claims adjusting firms, and insurance agents have refused or have been most reluctant to furnish files regarding losses and coverage because of the universal fear that the information furnished could be obtained by the insured in an Freedom of Information Act disclosure which the insured might use against the insurance company or firm in a civil suit. The FBI has been required to obtain federal grand jury subpoenas to secure the desired information, which in every instance caused delay in the investigation. Many of these firms cited widespread news publicity resulting from Freedom of Information Act disclosures as cause for their total lack of confidence that the FBI would maintain information in confidence.

Sammy is constantly researching interesting information and writing articles to make it easy for his readers to understand.


To see more of his writing, visit his articles about criminal court record searches and social security death records sites.

The Drug Enforcement Agency and the Freedom of Information Act

The DEA undertook a detailed analysis of the effect of the Freedom of Information Act on DEA’s investigative operations. Since 1977, reports had been received from various DEA field offices suggesting that the Freedom of Information Act was adversely affecting various types of DEA investigations. Nearly all of these reports indicated that the Freedom of Information Act-related effect on criminal investigations, on DEA’s relations with the private sector, and on the relationship between DEA and state and local police departments was primarily the result of the inability of the Federal government to offer credible assurances of confidentiality.

The Freedom of Information Act was enacted in 1966 to allow any person to request any record from a Federal agency. The statute, however, included nine exemptions which were intended to serve the protectable interests of the Federal government, private financial interests, and individual privacy rights. In 1974, the law was significantly amended to require Federal agencies to comply with strict procedures in the administrative handling of Freedom of Information Act requests and to make available certain previously exempt information relating to national defense and foreign policy as well as Federal law enforcement operations.

As currently written, the Freedom of Information Act allows Federal law enforcement agencies to withhold information if it is part of an investigative record compiled for law enforcement purposes, but only to the extent that its disclosure would:

* Interfere with enforcement proceedings.

* Deprive a person of a right to a fair trial or an impartial Juris- diction.

* Constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

* Disclose the identity of a confidential source and, in the case of a record compiled by a criminal law enforcement authority in the course of a criminal investigation, or by an agency conducting a lawful national security intelligence investigation, confidential information furnished only by the confidential source.

* Disclose investigative techniques and procedures.

* Endanger the life or physicsd safety of law enforcement personnel.

However, reports received from DEA field offices suggested that the law was having a detrimental effect on enforcement efforts. DEA then initiated a study to measure the impact of the Freedom of Information Act to the agency’s overall enforcement efforts.

DEA Agents participating in the study clearly indicated that information disclosures made pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act and the Privacy Act are adversely affecting their investigative efforts. Agents reported that intelligence information is not nearly so forthcoming as similar information prior to the enactment of the Freedom of Information Act.

Sammy is constantly researching interesting information and writing articles to make it easy for his readers to understand.


To see more of his writing, visit his articles about social security number search sites.

How do I obtain my FBI profile via the freedom of information act?

I have heard that I am legally allowed to view my personal FBI profile ,if it exists, via the freedom of information act. Is this true? And if so, how would I go about doing so?

United Nations exhibit put on by OWI in Rockefeller Plaza, New York, N.Y. Central motif was this frame containing copy of Atlantic charter, with amplifiers at each end broadcasting speeches by Roosevelt, Churchill and Chiang Kai-Shek every half hour, and

Freedom of Information
Image taken on 1940-01-01 00:00:00 by The Library of Congress.

Latest Freedom Of Information Auctions

Hey, check out these auctions:
[eba kw=”Freedom of Information” num=”2″ ebcat=”all”]
Cool, arent they?

How can i get freedom of information concerning creditors ?

Concerning a syndicated UK company (now liquidated) that i was a member of.
Why won’t the liquidator specify what the creditors dealing were in the syndicated UK company ?
Is it legal for the liquidator to do this ?
How can i find out (through freedom of information) what these creditors dealings/sevices were… they have just appeared out of the woodwork from nowhere.

Training Managers for Freedom of Information


Go inside a Freedom Of Information (FOI) training session to see how government’s information managers are gearing up for January 2009.

Latest Freedom Of Information Auctions

Hey, check out these auctions:
[eba kw=”Freedom of Information” num=”2″ ebcat=”all”]
Cool, arent they?