Home » Archive by category "Income Tax" (Page 4)

Ron Paul Revolution: PART 1 – The Profound Plan For Freedom

**PART 2** www.youtube.com www.GiveMeLiberty.org Ron Paul has brought a vision of Liberty to the People. This is the practical and profound Plan to peacefully reclaim our Freedom and restore Constitutional Order. Please visit GiveMeLiberty.org/revolution for all the details, more video, and the academic research & legal documentation establishing the power of the little-known Constitutionally protected Right at the heart of this profound Plan. The last ten words of the First Amendment protect a most potent 800-year old, unalienable Right the Government does NOT want you to know about. It is time to move the Ron Paul Revolution beyond the paradigm of electoral politics and reclaim our Liberty.

America: Freedom to Facism

Determined to find the law that requires American citizens to pay income tax, producer Aaron Russo (“The Rose,” “Trading Places”) set out on a journey to find the evidence. Neither left, nor right-wing this startling examination of government exposes the systematic erosion of civil liberties in America since 1913.
Video Rating: 4 / 5

IRS Commissioner Dodges Income Tax Question – No Law!

New York Times reporter David Cay Johnston asked IRS Commissioner Mark Everson, “What law requires Americans to file or pay income taxes?” His answer: Blah blah blah blah blah; dodge dodge dodge dodge dodge. The IRS Assistant Commissioner’s answer: Blah blah blah blah blah; dodge dodge…

Former IRS CID Agent Joseph R Banister and presidential candidate Ron Paul discuss the illegality of the income tax on a 2004 edition of CNBC’s Special Report with Maria Bartiromo. Watch Aaron Russo’s AMERICA: Freedom To Fascism for free on Google Video to learn more about the illegality of the income tax.

America – Freedom to Fascism (1/5)

www.MasterNewMedia.org Excerpt from the documentary America – Freedom To Fascism, available in full at http
Video Rating: 4 / 5

The Center for Freedom and Prosperity Foundation has produced videos showing the economic and moral benefits of so-called tax havens. This final video in the three-part series addresses some of the most common myths put forth by politicians from high-tax nations. Using academic research and data from international organizations, the video shows that the most common attacks made against low-tax jurisdictions are empty demagoguery.
Video Rating: 4 / 5

“We Are Americans” Opinion Editorial by Charles Fowler, Candidate for the United States Senate in the Colorado Republican Primary

(PRWEB) April 24, 2004

I am deeply troubled by what I sense to be almost like a Civil War in this country in our political arena. There is such a polarization between the left and the right, between Republican and Democrat. But listen, we are all Americans. When it comes right down to it, we are not Democrats, Republicans or Independents, we are Americans. I mean if the bomb were to drop today, we would all stand up together as Americans. Some how I think we have forgotten that.

And for the American Eagle to soar economically and politically it is going to take both wings, left and right working together. In order for anything positive to happen in the United States Congress it takes bipartisan leadership.

“And the two wings of the great eagle were given to the woman, in order that she might fly into the wilderness to her place”

Revelation 12:14; NASB

This biblical passages speaks clearly of God using the United States of America in His’ Divine Providence. It speaks of the “two wings” which I believe are the left wing and right wing in American politics. But who is the woman?

Allow me to quote part of the poem that’s on the Statue of Liberty:

“Keep, ancient lands, your storied pomp!”

cries she with silent lips.

Give me your tired, your poor,

your huddled masses yearning to breathe free;

The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.

Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed to me,

I lift my lamp beside the golden door.

-by Emma Lazarus, New York City, 1883

The Statue of Liberty holds a torch in her right hand and carries in her left a book of law inscribed “July 4, 1776.” The broken chains, symbolizing the overthrow of tyranny, lie at her feet.

Immigrants the world over would see “Lady Liberty” welcoming them to America’s shores. For more than one hundred years the Statue of Liberty has become the global symbol of freedom.

Referring back to our text in Revelation, it is significant that the Holy Spirit does not actually refer simply to “the wings of the great eagle,” but very specifically “the two wings.”

In America today the Christian vote is divided politically. Christians who vote Republican do so for their anti-abortion platform. Christians who vote for the Democrats are conscious of the needs of working people, care for the poor and hurting in our nation. Independents tend to be a mixture of the two who do not feel represented by either.

I believe that God needs Christians in both political parties to be salt and light, in order to provide a positive influence in our government. I personally believe that God has given “the two wings of the great eagle” to the woman, “Liberty.”

“Give me your tired, your poor,

Your huddled masses yearning to be free;”

But the message for us today is that it takes two wings for this American eagle to fly. It takes both the left wing and the rignt wing. Isn’t it time we agreed to disagree and when we disagree, do it with dignity and respect for each other?

The two missing ingredients in the United States today are dignity and respect for each other. Respect between Republicans and Democrats. Respect between workers and employers. Respect and dignity in our political campaigns?

Today if you are a politician looking for PAC money or endorsements, you find out that if you are just a little moderate, it is very difficult. PAC money only goes to people on the hard left or the hard right, moderates don’t seem to fit into the political scheme. One group wants to abolish Public Broadcasting and the other wants to abolish the Department of Education. Another group demands your’ support for abortion, the other group demands your’ support for vouchers. If you are a Republican, and prefer tax credits over vouchers, support Public Broadcasting and believe that the Department of Education provides a vital service, then, “lots of luck.”

Today we have so demonized the opposition, polarized those with whom we disagree that issues become secondary and honest debate seems impossible. It was Ronald Reagan, one of our nation’s greatest Presidents, who presented what he called, the 11th Commandment:

“Never speak ill of a fellow Republican.”

What he was saying, is treat each other the way you would like to be treated. Treat each other with dignity and respect. I think in America that it would be good if we adopted something very similiar in our thinking: “Never speak ill of a fellow American.”

In other words, quit demonizing the other party and start treating each other with dignity and respect. It is what another great American President, John F. Kennedy said:

“Every American ought to have the right to be treated as he would wish to be treated, as one would wish his children to be treated.”

Education

I am of the opinion that there have been too many budget cuts and that the Senate has failed to properly fund our educational programs. My position is that we need to fully support the Department of Education and send more federal funds from Washington to help states and local school districts have the full funding they need for such programs as are needed for “Children with Learning Disabilities” and other programs.

I feel like the black sheep in the party for my stand on education. Bob Schaffer wants to abolish the Deparment of Education and I want to increase the Department of Education’s funding. Most of the Republicans in Colorado are for vouchers. I prefer tax credits. I would like to see tax credits established for all tuition payments from Preschool all the way to the Ph.D. This would be a sound investment in the future of our nation.

I find it interesting that we can find the funds to build prisons and not schools. Experts tell me that the future prison population can be determined by Fourth Grade test scores. It sounds like we have our priorities very confused. The education of kids should be the top prioirty in the future. If we work together, instead of against each other, we can repair, remodel and build better schools instead of being forced to build more prisons.

School Construction

School Construction should become a priority in America again. I have been to Las Animas and other school districts where the buildings are much older and in need of repair. Students who attend class in dilapidated, hazardous and sometimes dangerous buildings have a difficult time learning. Many of our schools are not equipped with the computers and high-tech education that today’s students must have.

Smaller, rural and lower income school districts cannot accomplish this without some federal funding to help. In my opinion we need to work together to see that we have funding to help these districts repair their most dilapidated public school buildings and when needed build new schools.

There is an elementary school in use today in Las Animas, Colorado which was built in the 1880’s. It is a well cared for and historic facility, but underscores the fact that it has been many years since many school districts have been able to build new school buildings.

PLAN FOR FUNDING HIGHER EDUCATION

My roots are in agriculture and I strongly support anything that will genuinely help the farmers and ranchers of Colorado. However, the Farm Security Act; a $ 73 billion hike in agricultural subsidies enacted for the good purpose of aiding impoverished farmers now has such restrictions that link these subsidies to select crops and total acreage to ensure now that wealthy farm owners, corporate executives and even other legislators benefit the most. For example, basketball star Scottie Pippen and billionaires Charles Schwaab, David Rockefeller and Ted Turner each received six-digit farm subsidies over the past five years.

So what if we take about half of those subsidies to the billionaires and propose a $ 35 billion financial aid package that would go to the states to help bring college tuition down.

And, while we are at it, take another $ 35 billion from the billionaire farmers and fund health care for the many Veterans who gave of themselves in order that we might be free today.

Experts on government waste estimate that another $ 20 billion a year is literally thrown away each year on political pork. Let’s kill the pork and bring another $ 20 billion to the table and start offering some additional tax credits for some of our college students to help pay for their tuition. Helping kids through college is not pork, it is an investment in the future of our country.

Veterans

We must never turn our back on the brave men and women of our Armed Forces. Colorado is home to thousands of these brave men and women who have chosen to risk their lives to make us safe and fight for freedom around the globe.

We need to make certain that when our servicemen and women are called to duty that their families do not face an undue financial burden.

FOWLER FAQ’S

Why are you running for this office?

In order to represent the interests and the values of the hard working people of Colorado and not forget the people and their values once I get to Washington. I pledge to hold regular town hall style meetings across the state and form bipartisan policy committees to help find solutions and solve any problems we may face in the future.

What are your views on President Bush’s new immigration plan?

It is a moral immigration policy that takes into account the concept of the “right to migrate” and the priority of the famiy over the state. It does not threaten our security and over the long haul will benefit our economy.

Should Roe vs. Wade be overturned?

Yes, Row vs Wade was an attempt by the court to write legislation. Their decision was based on the “penumbra” of the Constitution, a mysterious shadow or spirit of the Constitution, which was being created by the decision itself. Supreme Court Justices are not elected and according to Artice 1, Section 1 of the Constitution, should not write laws

Do you favor the Allard/Musgrave amendment banning same-sex marriage?

Yes, but I also believe that the laws are already in place that support traditional marriage. If this amendment passes, it would still be tested in the court system. Either way the legislatures go with this issue, it is still going to wind up in the hands of the Supreme Court. While I do support traditional marriage, it is eventually going to be a decision for the Judicial Branch and not Congress. It is simply a Judicial decision in my view, if you lay all the political hype to the side, the courts are actually going to decide this. And that underscores the importance of strong Constitutional Justices being appointed to the judiciary, especially to the United States Supreme Court.

What are the three biggest issues facing your constituents and what do you see as solutions?

For me, I think it is education, workers rights and military pay. I also think it is vital that we elect someone to the United States Senate with an open heart and a listening ear, that will work hard to represent the main stream values of all of Colorado.

So public education is my top priority, especially in the area of school modernization. Education is not pork, it is our kids future. I prefer tax credits over vouchers and would like to see tax credits established for all tuition payments from preschool to Ph.D. There should be federal funds to assist in school modernization and the Department of Education plays a vital role.

Military pay is a major issue for me, we send our brave soldiers into combat and their families should not struggle financially.

Workers rights: we need a worker friendly Senator who understands the struggles of working families and does not fight against them. I am very concerned with Pete Coors and his history in this area. While I am not seeking the endorsement of the AFL-CIO, I do agree with them on many of the issues they are fighting for.

At this stage in this campaign I need your support in order to ensure that my name is on the ballot in August and that I can conduct a competitive campaign. Please visit my website for details.

CONTACT INFORMATION:

Brian Raile, Campaign Manager

Charles Fowler for United States Senate

Post Office Box 5532

Colorado Springs, Colorado 80931-5532

719-471-1040

http://www.charlesfowler.com



Delaware: The Incorporation Capital Of America

Why Delaware?

Delaware is famed to be the “incorporation capital” of America – more than 60% of Fortune 500 companies are incorporated in Delaware. According to Delaware Department of State, Division of Corporation’s 2006 Annual Report the number of active business entities in Delaware has grown 50% in the last six years to a total of more than 765,000. In 2006, Delaware welcomed more than 145,000 new businesses.

The reason why so many Fortune 500 companies are drawn to this state is the fact that Delaware has an excellent body of corporate case law spanning 110 years regarding such matters as management/shareholder issues and mergers/acquisitions. More and more people choose to incorporate in Delaware because of the friendly conditions offered by that state.

Advantages of Incorporating in Delaware

Here are some advantages of incorporating in Delaware:

Names and addresses of shareholders and directors of a Delaware Company do not appear within public records. Moreover, during incorporation process, there is no obligation to provide this information to the State of Delaware.
No minimal capital investment in the Company is required
The Company has no obligation to have a bank account in Delaware.
The Delaware Company headquarters may be located anywhere in the world. The Company has no obligation to have its headquarters in Delaware, nor to conduct any business in this state. The sole obligation for the Company doing business somewhere other than Delaware is to be represented by a Registered Agent in Delaware
The same person can be Shareholder, Director and Officer of a Delaware Company. Directors can establish the price they wish for the sale of the Company’s shares. They can also adopt, modify or repeal any Company bylaw.
If the Company does not do business in Delaware, it does not have to pay any income tax to the state.
If a Delaware Company shareholder doesn’t reside in the state, he doesn’t have to pay any taxes concerning the Shares.
There is no sales tax in Delaware.
If a Delaware Company shareholder doesn’t reside in the state, the said shares are not subject to inheritance tax in case of death.
The Delaware Court of Chancery is the oldest business court in the country and uses judges instead of juries
Delaware adopted a whole set of corporate laws which are very favorable to companies and which recognize contractual freedom. The “General Law Corporation” of Delaware is one of the most evolved and flexible corporate laws in the United States.

With all those advantages in place, Delaware might not be the most suitable place to incorporate your new business. Delaware is one of the three states commonly recognized as “corporate heavens”, the other two being Nevada and Wyoming. Before making your choice please see our article that runs a comparison Delaware vs. Nevada. vs. Wyoming.

 

MyUSACorporation.com is an online business dedicated to help entrepreneurs with all their business filing needs. MyUSAcorporation can help incorporate your businesses, form LLC, obtain various business licenses, and much more.

Article from articlesbase.com

Related Income Tax Vs Freedom Articles

Conservative vs Liberal vs Moderate, read carefully which are you really?

Question by Stanley: Conservative vs Liberal vs Moderate, read carefully which are you really?
Who ever here that said “CONSERVATIVE POLICIES THAT MADE THIS COUNTRY GREAT!” is speaking Hog wash! By the definition the conservative would first off never have left his european country for religious freedom, a true conservative would never had broke from the colonial power in which was controlling the colony. A conservative would never had wanted the average citizen the right to bare arms and allow them freedom of speech or a democracy. a True conservative by definition would never have wanted such “progressive changes”.

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/conservatism
Main Entry: con·ser·va·tism
Pronunciation: \kən-ˈsər-və-ˌti-zəm\
Function: noun
Date: 1832
1 capitalized a : the principles and policies of a Conservative party b : the Conservative party
2 a : disposition in politics to preserve what is established b : a political philosophy based on tradition and social stability, stressing established institutions, and preferring gradual development to abrupt change; specifically : such a philosophy calling for lower taxes, limited government regulation of business and investing, a strong national defense, and individual financial responsibility for personal needs (as retirement income or health-care coverage)
3 : the tendency to prefer an existing or traditional situation to change

The Liberal is what made it great.

Religious freedom: Liberal
Right to bare arms: Liberal
Freedom of Speech: Liberal

Main Entry: lib·er·al·ism
Pronunciation: \ˈli-b(ə-)rə-ˌli-zəm\
Function: noun
Date: 1819
1 : the quality or state of being liberal
2 a often capitalized : a movement in modern Protestantism emphasizing intellectual liberty and the spiritual and ethical content of Christianity b : a theory in economics emphasizing individual freedom from restraint and usually based on free competition, the self-regulating market, and the gold standard c : a political philosophy based on belief in progress, the essential goodness of the human race, and the autonomy of the individual and standing for the protection of political and civil liberties; specifically : such a philosophy that considers government as a crucial instrument for amelioration of social inequities (as those involving race, gender, or class) d capitalized : the principles and policies of a Liberal party

The bottom line is that if it was left up to conservatives we would still be a colony that was only allowed to worship one religion and would have to awnser to the king or queen. It was the Liberals that broke us away from that.

The Moderate

A bunch of stooges stuck in the middle who cannot make up their minds.
Main Entry: 1mod·er·ate
Pronunciation: \ˈmä-d(ə-)rət\
Function: adjective
Etymology: Middle English, from Latin moderatus, from past participle of moderare to moderate; akin to Latin modus measure
Date: 15th century
1 a : avoiding extremes of behavior or expression : observing reasonable limits b : calm, temperate
2 a : tending toward the mean or average amount or dimension b : having average or less than average quality : mediocre
3 : professing or characterized by political or social beliefs that are not extreme
4 : limited in scope or effect
5 : not expensive : reasonable or low in price
6 of a color : of medium lightness and medium chroma
oh and demecracy….Liberal
This is interesting indeed. However todays conservative is not yesterdays classic liberal. only in part. Todays conservative is still conservative, and adhears to the definition of conservatism.
However I see that both todays “modern conservative and modern liberal, both came from classic liberalism. Yet the conservatives adopted conservative ideals such as fear of change, and Liberals adopted a more social aspect. Amazing how simular they are, considering the social liberal is considered more cenrtral

Best answer:

Answer by Crow
Liberal

Know better? Leave your own answer in the comments!

NEJM Publishes Trial Results Demonstrating Bard FLAIR Endovascular Stent Graft Is Superior To Balloon Angioplasty For Failing Dialysis Grafts



Bard FLAIR Stent Graft Keeps Dialysis Access Grafts Open Longer than Angioplasty

Murray Hill, NJ (PRWEB) February 10, 2010

C. R. Bard, Inc. (NYSE: BCR) today announced the publication of trial results by The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) showing the Bard FLAIR® Endovascular Stent Graft maintains the patency of dialysis access grafts more effectively than balloon angioplasty alone. It is the first prospective study to demonstrate the superiority of a new therapy over balloon angioplasty for hemodialysis patients who experience stenoses, or narrowing, where the graft connects with a vein, that can limit blood flow and lead to ineffective dialysis treatment.

Hemodialysis is the leading treatment for more than 341,000 patients in the United States with end-stage renal disease (ESRD), or kidney failure, which can be caused by common chronic conditions such as diabetes and hypertension. Preparation for hemodialysis begins with the surgical creation of a “vascular access” that connects an artery and vein in the arm for dialysis treatment. Prosthetic arteriovenous (AV) grafts, or synthetic tubes, are commonly used for vascular access; however, they frequently develop stenoses at the venous anastomosis. Although balloon angioplasty is commonly used to treat this complication, its poor durability often leads to frequent repeat procedures. As many as 25% of U.S. ESRD patient hospital admissions result from complications related to vascular access, with an estimated cost of $ 1 billion per year.

The FLAIR® Endovascular Stent Graft is the first interventional implant technology approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for use in the treatment of stenoses at the venous anastomosis of ePTFE or other synthetic AV grafts. In the prospective, randomized, controlled, multi-center trial, 190 patients who required treatment for failing AV grafts received either balloon angioplasty alone or balloon angioplasty and a FLAIR® Endovascular Stent Graft. At six months, the treatment area of patients that received a FLAIR® Endovascular Stent Graft was more than twice as likely to be functioning when compared to patients who received balloon angioplasty alone (treatment area primary patency, 50.6 percent vs. 23.3 percent respectively) and at 210 days, the treatment area was far less likely to require additional interventions (p=0.008). Adverse events, patient demographics and clinical variables were statistically equivalent between both groups during the trial.

“This is a game-changing study,” said Ziv Haskal M.D., Chief of the Vascular and Interventional Radiology Division at the University of Maryland Medical Center in Baltimore and principal investigator. “For the first time, clinicians have compelling evidence that we can significantly improve outcomes over balloon angioplasty in this underserved and difficult-to-treat patient population. The durable benefit we observed in the trial, as demonstrated by superior patency and freedom from repeat interventions, strongly supports a fundamental change in how we care for hemodialysis patients.”

Timothy M. Ring, chairman and chief executive officer, commented, “The publication of the FLAIR® Trial in The New England Journal of Medicine speaks to the rigor of the trial, the relevance of the resultant data and the impact this technology could have on the care of hemodialysis patients. It also has important implications for the healthcare system as our aging population intersects with increasing pressure to control costs and the desire for better evidence-based medicine.”

C. R. Bard, Inc., (www.crbard.com) headquartered in Murray Hill, N.J., is a leading multinational developer, manufacturer and marketer of innovative, life-enhancing medical technologies in the fields of vascular, urology, oncology and surgical specialty products.

This press release may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, which are based on management’s current expectations, the accuracy of which is necessarily subject to risks and uncertainties. These statements are not historical in nature and use words such as “anticipate”, “estimate”, “expect”, “project”, “intend”, “forecast”, “plan”, “believe”, and other words of similar meaning in connection with any discussion of future operating or financial performance. Many factors may cause actual results to differ materially from anticipated results including product developments, sales efforts, income tax matters, the outcomes of contingencies such as legal proceedings, and other economic, business, competitive and regulatory factors. The company undertakes no obligation to update its forward-looking statements. Please refer to the Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information in Bard’s September 30, 2009 Form 10-Q for more detailed information about these and other factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied.

###





Find More Income Tax Vs Freedom Press Releases

Should You Stay or Go? Bills.com’s Tips Let Workers Compare New Job to Old Career

San Mateo, CA (PRWEB) August 1, 2007

With U.S. unemployment fairly low at a level of 4.5 percent in recent months, companies must compete for good workers — and Bills.com co-founder and co-CEO Andrew Housser offers workers a seven-point checklist to compare a job offer with their current position.

“If you are looking to upgrade your career, and have one or more opportunities, compare pay and benefits from each,” Housser advised. “Ask each employer — current and prospective — for a complete, itemized list of salary and benefits for which you are or will be eligible. Then, create a list with two columns, one for each job. Mark the monthly or annual total for each of the following elements of compensation in each category. Then add them up to calculate the best financial offer.”

1. Salary. “Salary is obvious: More is better,” Housser said. Consider how much financial stability you require, and carefully investigate positions that require a move from salary to commission. Before taking a commission-based position, be confident that income levels will maintain your financial footing. Profit sharing and bonuses are not a guaranteed part of compensation. And vesting requirements might demand loyalty to reap benefits.

2. Retirement. In the long run, retirement benefits can make a huge difference to financial well-being. Does the company have a pension plan? Does the employer match 401(k) plan contributions, and to what extent? Consider any contributions by current and prospective employers to calculate total income.

3. Health care. Does the employer pay employees’ health care premiums? If so, add the contributions to gross compensation. “Also, check into the type of plan offered,” Housser suggested. “Some small employers now pay for employees to purchase individual coverage. For most, this is fine. But be aware that if you have a covered family member with a pre-existing medical condition, it might be difficult, expensive or impossible to locate new individual coverage. If that is the case, be very cautious before changing employers.”

4. Vision and dental insurance. Not all employers offer these coverages. Compute the amount you spend each year minus the amount of coverage. For anticipated expenses like a child’s braces or dental surgery, call the insurer to determine coverage of those items.

5. Cafeteria plan. Also called a qualified benefit plan, this plan allows employees to save pre-tax money for certain benefits, such as dental, vision, life and disability insurance, health care, adoption assistance and other benefits. Multiply the anticipated savings by the income tax bracket to make a broad guess at savings. Find your tax bracket at http://301url.com/bbd.

6. Time off. Add vacation time, personal days and holidays. Divide days off by 261 (the number of working days in 2007) and multiply the figure by annual salary to determine the value of time off at each job.

7. Gut check. “Do not discount the value of your instinct, and remember that finances alone do not constitute the right position,” Housser said. “If the job is a dream job or an amazing stepping-stone to future opportunities, it might be a good move even if won’t improve your financial standards tremendously today.”

“Once your list is complete, you can make a decision — not to mention be prepared to negotiate if your employer makes a counteroffer,” Housser said. “Whatever you decide, you can be confident about your choice if you know you’ve considered the full package before making a move.”

Based in San Mateo, Calif., Bills.com is a free one-stop online portal where consumers can educate themselves about complex personal finance issues and comparison shop for products and services including credit cards, debt relief assistance, insurance, mortgages and other loans. The company blogs about consumer finance issues at http://www.bills.com/blog. Since 2002, Bills.com and its partner company, Freedom Financial Network, have served more than 15,000 customers nationwide while managing more than $ 350 million in consumer debt. The company’s co-founders and CEOs, Andrew Housser and Brad Stroh, were named Northern California finalists in Ernst & Young’s 2006 Entrepreneur of the Year Awards.

###



Related Income Tax Vs Freedom Press Releases

America: Freedom to fascism-11/11

America: Freedom to Fascism (also America: From Freedom to Fascism or (per the title card) America: Freedom to Fascism Volume One) is a 2006 film by Aaron Russo. It was exhibited in theaters in select US cities.[1] This documentary covers many subjects, including: the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), the income tax, Federal Reserve System, national ID cards (REAL ID Act), human-implanted RFID tags (Spychips), Diebold electronic voting machines,[2] globalization, Big Brother, taser weapons abuse,[3] and the alleged use of terrorism by government as a means to diminish the citizens’ rights. Some of the premises of the film include: The Federal Reserve System is unconstitutional and has maxed out the national debt and bankrupted the United States government. Federal income taxes were imposed in response to, or as part of, the plan implementing the Federal Reserve System. Federal income taxes are unconstitutional or otherwise legally invalid. The use of the Federal income tax to counter the economic effects of the Federal Reserve System is futile. The film’s claims about the illegality of the income tax in the United States have been critiqued as factually dubious by some reviewers.[4] The film has, however, developed a cult following
Video Rating: 4 / 5