Home » Posts tagged "Congress"

Can Obama implement a more progressive constitution to replace the old one if Congress approves?

Question by brasileiro: Can Obama implement a more progressive constitution to replace the old one if Congress approves?
They made this change in Grenada to improve their system with the new progressive PRG constitution , so can it be done in the U.S. ?

Best answer:

Answer by abaddono1
To Propose Amendments

* Two-thirds of both houses of Congress vote to propose an amendment, or

* Two-thirds of the state legislatures ask Congress to call a national convention to propose amendments. (This method has never been used.)

To Ratify Amendments

* Three-fourths of the state legislatures approve it, or

* Ratifying conventions in three-fourths of the states approve it. This method has been used only once — to ratify the 21st Amendment — repealing Prohibition.

Know better? Leave your own answer in the comments!

LOKPAL BILL SHOULD BE FRAMED KEEPING IN VIEW THE CONSTITUTION AND PARLIAMENT- CONGRESS

Congress said on Saturday (June 18) that the Lokpal bill should be framed keeping in view the constitution and the Parliament. The party maintained that bringing the Prime Minister in the purview of the Lokpal would amount to the weakening of the democratic structure.

Congress Takes the Oath to Support and Defend the Constitution

Speaker John Boehner and Members of the House of Representatives took the solemn oath of office to support and defend the Constitution of the United States on the first day of the 112th Congress. Your responsibility is to hold Congress to their oath. Congress must defeat all unconstitutional bills, repeal unconstitutional laws, and block all unconstitutional Executive Orders and regulations. Urge your Senators and Congressmen to live their oath every day they serve the citizens of America. The swearing in ceremony is brought to you as a public service of The Conservative Caucus, America’s Constitutional Government Action Organization. Edited by Art Harman. Text of the Oath of Office: “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.” Visit our websites: www.ConservativeUSA.org http www.SaveMannedSpace.com http C-SPAN coverage of the House Chamber is in public domain and carries no restrictions on its use. This derived work is copyrighted C 2011. Share this video and subscribe to our channel!
Video Rating: 0 / 5

Congress Reads the US Constitution, Bill of Rights (Part 4)

On the second day of the new Congress, members of the US House of Representatives read the Constitution aloud on the House Floor. Members take turns reading Amendments I – X from the Bill of Rights.
Video Rating: 4 / 5

Bachmann to host Constitution classes for Congress

Bachmann to host Constitution classes for Congress
Minnesota Rep. Michele Bachmann says she plans to host classes on the Constitution and the Bill of Rights for fellow House members when she returns to Washington.

Read more on Minnesota Public Radio

Apple location of the collection of information policy of the U.S. Congress

When Congress calls, response from Apple. According to CNet , general counsel and Apples vice president of legal and government affairs, Bruce Sewell, did not send two congressmen 13-page letter detail, and why Apples policies and procedures for collecting data based the location.
The letter is in response to a query sent last month by the Co-Bi-Partisan House Privacy Caucus, Ed Markey(D-MA) and Joe Barton(R-TX), Apples CEO Steve Jobs, calling him explanation of recent changes in Apples privacy policy dealing with location information.
Before directly answering questions congressmen, Sewell basin review the privacy policy clarification from Apple, location-based services and applications from other companies.
According to the document, and Apple does not collect information based on location to provide services, the company avoids most of storage and, if so, the data is not linked to any personal information. These principles include the various models and to IPAD iPhone and Mac OS X Snow Leopard or Safari 5th
Among the more interesting tidbits revealed in response to Apple is that as IOS 3.2 Apples mobile version of the software that first sent to the IPAD the company is no longer based on the location databases provided by partners, Google and Skyhook Wireless. Previously, Apple gave the location information to these companies, in order to determine the location of cell tower and access point Wi-Fi, respectively. At this time, however, Apple apparently used information from mobile devices to create its own database information about the location of both cellular towers and Wi-Fi access points that the database is only available through Apple itself. Equipment from previous versions of Apples mobile software continues to use a different database.
document also sheds some light on Apples new IAD network, launched earlier this month. In this case, Apple claims that the latitude and longitude information gathered from a mobile device immediately becomes a five-digit zip code, latitude and longitude information is discarded, but the postal code are stored. Apples plans for data retention period of six months in order to improve the IAD and prevent users from seeing duplicate ads, after that period is up, the information will be aggregated. As previously reported, users can easily opt out of data collection if they so desire.
In all cases, Apple points out that this requires user consent before collecting any information, location-based, and it provides an easy way to turn off the location-based services in any product which has the ability. It also requires that developers who distribute software through the mobile App Store, compliance with various regulations relating to data collection.
Apple document states, in response to nine questions related to the congressmen, and saying that actions][congressmen regarding the collection and misuse of location data. Statements by Representatives Markey and Barton both seemed satisfied with the response from Apple.

Via: Apple location of the collection of information policy of the U.S. Congress
Related Posting Search Result:

Apple App Store Development Restriction Tool
Apple found itself under considerable fire in the past few years to decide to keep so many aspects of the App Store…

BBC iPlayer streams to the devices more than Apples Android
Freedom of Information request the BBC found that streaming to mobile devices, Apple is now much more popular than the…

Apple kill switch detects the iPhone stolen, the thief pictures
Of course, if someone steals your iPhone, you may be able to remotely wipe it in order to protect confidential data. B…

Surprise Apple iPhone 4 Press Conference on Friday
On Wednesday afternoon Apple invited several journalists, including one with Macworld , the Cupertino campus on Frida…

Apple IPAD 2 on the road Christmas: Reports
Apple is the readiness of other pills like IPAD but with 7-inch touch screen to start as early as the end of this year…

Apple iPhone engineering chief resigns after the antenna
Mark Papermaster, Apple’s vice president of engineering for the iPhone and iPod, leaves the company, according to …

Source of this article:Tech Geek
Description of Source:
Phone|Mobile|Gadgets|Computers|Camera|Automotive
More:Apple App Store Development Restriction Tool
Apple found itself under considerable fire in the past few years to decide to keep so many aspects of the App Store…
More:BBC iPlayer streams to the devices more than Apples Android
Freedom of Information request the BBC found that streaming to mobile devices, Apple is now much more popular than the…

Information bill in 15th Congress (1:12 p.m.)

Information bill in 15th Congress (1:12 p.m.)
MANILA — A lawmaker vows to push for the passage of the freedom of information (FOI) bill in the 15th Congress after the measure failed to be ratified during the last and dramatic session in the prev read more

Read more on Sun Star

Palm Desert and San Diego California Constitutional Lawyer Analyzes the $700 Billion Bailout Plan as it Was First Proposed to Congress

Unless you are in a coma, it doesn’t matter where you live in California, in Corona del Mar, San Diego, Orange County, CA, Palm Springs, Palm Desert, Long Beach, Santa Ana, Anaheim, Riverside, Chula Vista, Irvine, San Bernardino, Huntington Beach, Fontana, Moreno Valley, Oceanside, Rancho Cucamonga, Ontario, Garden Grove, Palmdale, Corona, Escondido, Orange, Fullerton, Costa Mesa, Victorville, Carlsbad, Temecula, Murrieta, Mission Viejo, El Cajon, Vista, Westminster, Santa Monica, Santa Barbara, Hesperia, Newport Beach, Buena Park, Indio, Rancho Mirage, Indian Wells or Coachella, you will have somehow heard there is an economic crisis going on, and that Congress passed a whopping $700 billion bailout plan.

 

What you may not know, is that Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson’s draft proposal for the bailout of financial service firms on Wall Street as it was presented to Congress was an unconstitutional power grab of monumental proportions.

 

Under Paulson’s plan, no oversight, no review and no challenges would have been allowed by the courts, by Congress or by individuals. Henry Paulson had proposed that he effectively be appointed economic czar.

 

Under Section 8 of his initial proposal, which for years to come, will undoubtedly form the basis for questions on bar exams for law students, “Decisions by the Secretary pursuant to the authority of this Act, are non-reviewable and committed to agency discretion, and may not be reviewed by any court of law or any administrative agency.”

 

Under Section 8 of this Act, the Treasury Secretary would arguably have become a more powerful figure than our largely missing-in-action President, more powerful than the head of the Federal Reserve, the SEC and Congress combined, and as such in violation of the Constitution of the United States of America.

 

The draft proposal was in conflict with the Constitution for the simple reason that our nation’s most important document provides that every member of the executive branch, including the Treasury Secretary, is subject to legislative and executive review. Neither Congress nor the executive may delegate its authority to a cabinet member. It would have been like Congress delegating all its power to Sarah Palin, or to a single congressman, or to Superdog for that matter.

 

As hard as it is to violate the nondelegation clause in the Constitution, if there has ever been a proposal to come out of the executive branch which does a good job of it, it has been argued that this is probably the one.

 

The question is, did the President tell Paulson to get a blank check from Congress and to heck with the Constitution or did Paulson come up with this on his own? Did the President and Paulson really believe that if they told Congress they needed this power in 24 hours like the TV show, that Congress, even the Republicans in Congress, would give it to him?

 

In bad times even more so than in good times, we expect the leaders of this country to protect the Constitution of the United States, not to usurp the powers it conveys on other branches of government. Let us hope that in the coming days and months as this country tries to mend itself from this economic crisis, that Congress remembers what the executive branch seems to have forgotten – the Constitution.  

 

If you have a constitutional, or first amendment law issue in San Diego, Newport Beach, Irvine, Orange County, La Jolla, in the Inland Empire, Los Angeles, Palm Springs or anywhere in Southern California, we have the knowledge and resources to be your California Constitutional Lawyer and your Palm Springs and San Diego Business Attorney. Be sure to hire a California law firm with business and constitutional law experience who can serve areas such as Los Angeles, Palm Springs, Palm Desert, Anaheim, Irvine, Newport Beach, Carlsbad, Corona del Mar, Laguna Beach, Huntington Beach, Santa Ana, Rancho Cucamonga, Ontario, Fullerton, Del Mar, San Diego, Orange County, San Luis Obispo, Buena Park, La Jolla, Oxnard, Ventura, La Quinta, and Santa Barbara so you are properly represented.

 

If you have a constitutional, first amendment or business law issue of any kind, call the Law Offices of R. Sebastian Gibson, or visit our website at http://www.sebastiangibsonlaw.com  and learn how we can assist you.

The Sebastian Gibson Law Firm serves all of San Diego, Orange County, Palm Springs and Palm Desert, the Coastal Cities from La Jolla, Carlsbad and Del Mar to Laguna Beach, Newport Beach, Irvine, Santa Ana and up to Ventura, Oxnard, Santa Barbara and San Luis Obispo. We also serve the Inland Empire cities of Ontario, Rancho Cucamonga, Temecula, Riverside and San Bernardino and all the cities in the Coachella Valley and high desert, from La Quinta, Indio, and Coachella to Yucca Valley and Victorville.


Visit our website at http://www.sebastiangibsonlaw.com if you have a constitutional, first amendment or business law issue of any kind. We have the knowledge and resources to represent you as your California Constitutional Lawyer and Palm Desert Business Attorney or your attorney in and around the cities of Palm Springs, Palm Desert, San Diego, Orange County, Corona del Mar, Newport Beach, Santa Ana, Laguna Beach, Anaheim, Riverside, Chula Vista, Irvine, San Bernardino, Huntington Beach, Fontana, Moreno Valley, Oceanside, La Jolla, Del Mar, San Marcos, Rancho Cucamonga, Ontario, Garden Grove, Palmdale, Long Beach, Corona, Yorba Linda, Escondido, Orange, Fullerton, Costa Mesa, Victorville, Carlsbad, Temecula, Murrieta, Mission Viejo, El Cajon, Vista, Westminster, Santa Monica, Malibu, Westwood, Hesperia, Buena Park, Indio, Coachella, Del Mar, Oxnard, Ventura, San Luis Obispo, Cambria and Santa Barbara.

Presidents & Congress Ignoring the Constitution – Judge Napolitano


Is the government we have today what the founders had in mind? Everyone in government takes an oath to uphold the Constitution, but few do so. Beginning with John Adams, and proceeding to Abraham Lincoln, Woodrow Wilson, and George W. Bush, congress has enacted and the President has signed laws that have criminalized political speech, suspended Habeas Corpus, compelled support for war, forbade the freedom of contract, allowed the government to spy on Americans without a search warrant, and use tax payer dollars to shore up failing private banks. All of this legislation is so obviously in conflict with the plain words of the Constitution, that one wonders how Congress gets away with it. The truth is, that the Constitution grants Congress 17 specific delegated powers, and commands in the 9th and 10th Amendments, that the powers not articulated and thus not delegated by the Constitution to the Congress, must be reserved to the states and the people. What’s more, Congress can only use it’s delegated powers to legislate for what we call the general welfare. Meaning it cannot spend tax dollars on individuals or selected groups, but only for all of us. And, Congress cannot deny the equal protection of the laws, thus, it must treat similarly situated entities in a similar manner. It is clear that the framers wrote a constitution, as a result of which, contracts would be enforced, risk would be real, choices would be free and have consequences, and private property would be