Liberty WalkRemember – We Are America ! |
Question by Rani: •Analyze the expansion of the role of government in the context of national security threats and economic str
Analyze the expansion of the role of government in the context of national security threats and economic strains since World War I.
Best answer:
Answer by Thozz
ok
What do you think? Answer below!
www.gedwardgriffin.com | A Discourse on Government by G. Edward Griffin “Government is not reason. It is not eloquence. It is force. Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master.” — Attributed to George Washington This program consists of unedited responses to questions presented to G. Edward Griffin by a camera crew creating a documentary on the US Constitution. In this session, he answers the most difficult questions imaginable in the fields of political and social science. The depth and clarity of his response is amazing, especially considering he is speaking extemporaneously without benefit of script or notes. In an era when many people are just now waking up to the WHAT of current events, here are issues for the brain that go far beyond that shallow pool into the deep water of WHY and HOW. Also included is a bonus feature entitled Winning for America, Mr. Griffin’s commentary on the Ron Paul 2008 campaign and a long-term strategy for victory offered by Freedom Force International. With these programs together, be prepared for a most rewarding journey. http | restoretherepublic.com http www.trueworldhistory.info
Suzanna Gratia-Hupp explains the 2nd Amendment to the US Senate. www.LibertyPen.com
Question by Theapplerep: What are the powers that the constitution is presumed to have delegated to national government because it was?
What are the powers that the constitution is presumed to have delegated to national government because it is the government of a sovereign state within the world community.
Best answer:
Answer by Jim
http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/constitution_transcript.html
Add your own answer in the comments!
Question by no vanilla for me: Are we turning more so and more so into an authoritarian government who does not allow freedom of religion?
Or I should say, free expression of religion…What would make a teacher any more so influential than the president of the United State? Yet we allow the president to express his or her religious beliefs. And why shouldn’t we? Why shouldn’t all be allowed to pratice freedom of religion, why should we put restrictions on teachers?
Best answer:
Answer by Lucifer
We have plenty of freedom of Religion, but the tools will discriminate and hate you for it…. Unless you’re a Christian.
Doesn’t sound too much like religious freedom to me, but that is what they call it.
What do you think? Answer below!
Question by casey: Why did the writers of the Constitution created a federal system of government?
Also, what’s the relationship between the principles of checks and balances and the separation of powers as detailed in the Constitution?
Best answer:
Answer by Professortemple
They created a stronger federal system of the government in the Constitution because of the failures of the Articles of Confederation, which made for a very weak federal government, and gave all the powers to the states, leading to a number of problems, including within the military, taxation, currency, trade, and mobility of citizens.
The checks and balances system is a key feature of the separation of powers, in that it allows for one branch of the government to ensure that the other(s) aren’t exceeding their power.
Add your own answer in the comments!
Question by Young Quezy: What are two ways the constitution allows our government to make decisions concerning individual rights?
What are two ways the constitution allows our government to make decisions concerning individual rights?
Also, whats one situation where the United Sates government has suspended individual rights to protect the “common good”?
Give as much description as you can, thanks.
Best answer:
Answer by fredo
The Constitution gives Congress the ability to suspend habeas corpus (the doctrine saying you have a right to a hearing if you are being detained) in times of war or insurrection, effectively allowing Congress to decide that individual rights are outweighed by national security.
Also, the Constitution gives Congress the authority to enforce the 14th Amendment, which guarantees the same rights for all people. So they are allowed to make decisions regarding individual rights when it comes to making states give their citizens equal rights.
The government has suspended habeas corpus, once during the Civil War, once during Reconstruction, and again recently following 9-11.
Give your answer to this question below!
Question by BekindtoAnimals22: Why would the government want to privatize intelligence work? Isn’t that national security?
I’m watching CSPAN right now and they are discussing this. Why is the government trying to take over things like health care which is not their responsibility and dumping their real responsibilities such as military and intelligence? Doesn’t this seem a little strange since the Constitution calls national security a primary responsibility of the federal government?
Why would this be permitted. Doesn’t the constitution mean anything anymore? Isn’t our government over stepping its bounds? If so, why are we allowing them to do it?
Best answer:
Answer by signal20leo
95% of it already is and has been since I was at USCENTCOM in 1999.
Know better? Leave your own answer in the comments!
Question by Nancy Pelosi 2016: Do you think America needs a new Constitution to reduce dysfunction and paralysis in the Federal government?
Even in the Federalist Papers, our founding fathers made it rather clear that they didn’t intend for the US Constitution to last for all of eternity.
Has the current Constitution run its course?
Should it be replaced with a new one with more efficient governance?
Best answer:
Answer by YoungCon
If we do replace it, I don’t want you to be a delegate at the new Constitutional Convention.
Give your answer to this question below!
Cenk Uygur (host of The Young Turks) on his weekly Daily Rant segment on The Dylan Ratigan show on MSNBC explains the absurdity of popular tea party candidates who are against the separation of church and state. Watch Cenk with Ratigan every Wednesday around 4:45pm ET/1:45pm PT.
Video Rating: 4 / 5
 |
Copyright © 2024. Liberty Walk. All rights reserved |
