Home » Posts tagged "health"

what will obama do for health care and national security?

Question by shelby hicks: what will obama do for health care and national security?
i am in high school and have to do research on what obama do for health care and national security. and help? i have to turn it all in by tommorow. please help. and if you know anything on what mccain will do on health care and national security. please let me know.

Best answer:

Answer by Carl J
See www.physicians-surgeons-mccain.com and
www.Nurses4McCain.com

Basically in a nutshell, Obama will make it all socialized, boost the cost to the taxpayers and reduce the competency and efficiency. Patients will have long waits for routine procedures like getting a gall bladder out, like in Canada and Europe. You won’t be able to choose your doctors or see a specialist if you want. You’ll have to do more paperwork for government permissions to access specialty, expensive or unusual healthcare.

Your best bet is don’t smoke or do drugs, exercise regularly and don’t do screen activities to the point of getting overweight. If something hurts, stop doing it, stock up on over the counter remedies, and

oh yeah, stay in school and get an education before you have kids
to take care of.

Know better? Leave your own answer in the comments!

Posted on February 19, 2012 by , 1 comment

Integrated Oncology Network Makes A Strategic Investment In SightLine Health

Integrated Oncology Network Makes A Strategic Investment In SightLine Health










Corona del Mar, California (PRWEB) December 02, 2011

Integrated Oncology Network, LLC (“ION”) today announced that it has made a strategic investment in SightLine Health, LLC, and its subsidiaries (“SightLine”). SightLine, through its subsidiaries and affiliates, develops and manages radiation centers in partnership with radiation oncologists, medical oncologists, urologists and surgeons. Currently, SightLine owns minority interests in and manages six radiation oncology centers located in Houston, West Houston and Lubbock, Texas; Beverly Hills and Woodland Hills, California; and Tukwilla, Washington. SightLine has an additional center scheduled to open in Denver, Colorado in the the second quarter of 2012.

“We are excited by the opportunity to partner with TJ Farnsworth and the SightLine management team with a focus on continuing to integrate multispecialty oncologic physicians in community-based cancer centers,” said Jeffrey Goffman, the chairman and CEO of ION. “SightLine’s business model as a minority owner is consistent with ION’s strategy, and we believe with ION’s core expertise we can add significant value to SightLine as it expands into integrated group practice opportunities.”

TJ Farnsworth, SightLine’s chief executive officer, said, “Synergies between ION and SightLine will help both companies reach the next level of growth. ION’s network of solutions for integrated oncology groups will help us achieve our strategic business goals rapidly and efficiently. We look forward to working together.”

JMP Securities LLC acted as financial advisor to SightLine on the transacton.

About ION

ION, headquartered in Corona del Mar, California, is a radiation oncology management, development, and advisory firm that provides oncology solutions and capital for physician practices and hospitals who seek strategic, financial, and management expertise. ION’s management team has expertise in assisting physicians with the formation of integrated oncology groups, which can enhance operational efficiencies and optimize utilization while continuing to focus on providing the best patient care. ION provides solutions for transactional services, project development for cancer centers, financing, and management services with expertise in radiation oncology operations, billing and collection, accounting, compliance, IT, M&A, physics and dosimetry, and other administrative services. ION provides liquidity for physician and hospital owners as it invests as a minority partner in radiation oncology centers with both physicians and hospitals. ION’s management team has over 50 years of combined health care expertise, including working with several of the most prestigious oncology groups in the country as a trusted resource. For more information on ION, please visit our web site at http://www.ion-llc.com.

ION is a privately held company whose shareholders include a small group of strategic investors, including Capricorn Investment Group and Comvest Group.

About SightLine Health, LLC

SightLine Health, headquartered in Houston, Texas, specializes in groundbreaking cancer treatments such as intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT), high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy, and electron-beam radiation therapy. The company opened its first facility near the renowned Texas Medical Center, in 2005 and was recently ranked 86 on Inc. magazine’s 2011 Inc. 500 list. For more information on SightLine Health or any of its effective treatments, please visit http://sighlinehealth.com

About Capricorn Investment Group

Capricorn Investment Group is a private, independent investment firm designed to be an ideal partner for clients desiring a global portfolio driven by consistent returns and underpinned by a principled philosophy. Capricorn currently manages approximately $ 5 billion through various investment strategies, which cover a range of areas, from long term, diversified global growth investment strategies, venture capital and private equity, credit strategies, and “clean and green” growth capital. Capricorn’s investment philosophy is grounded in a strong fundamentals focused investment model, comprehensive research on long term, global mega-themes, such as energy, agriculture, transportation, consumer, health and wellness, technology, and consideration of business smart sustainability principles.

About Comvest Group

The Comvest Group is a leading private investment firm focused on providing debt and equity capital to lower middle-market companies. Our firm includes seasoned, senior level operating executives at all levels who partner with managers and owners of companies to grow businesses and create long-term value. Since 1988, Comvest has invested more than $ 2 billion of capital in over 200 public and private companies. For more information, please visit http://www.comvest.com.

Forward-Looking Statements

Statements in this Press Release that are not historical facts constitute “forward-looking statements.” Any statements contained herein which are not historical facts or which contain the words “anticipate,” “believe,” “continue,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “should,” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such statements reflect the current view of ION with respect to future events and are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions, including, but not limited to, the risk that ION may not be able to implement its growth strategy in the intended manner, including the ability to identify, finance, complete joint venture opportunities, risks regarding currently unforeseen competitive pressures and risks affecting ION’s industry, such as increased regulatory compliance and changes in regulatory requirements, changes in payor reimbursement levels. Should one or more of those risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those described herein.

###









Attachments


















Vocus©Copyright 1997-

, Vocus PRW Holdings, LLC.
Vocus, PRWeb, and Publicity Wire are trademarks or registered trademarks of Vocus, Inc. or Vocus PRW Holdings, LLC.







Find More The Constitution Press Releases

Posted on December 28, 2011 by , Reply

PayingthePrice.org Publishes New Information Regarding U.S. Health Care Reform, Big Pharma and Prescription Drugs from Canada

PayingthePrice.org Publishes New Information Regarding U.S. Health Care Reform, Big Pharma and Prescription Drugs from Canada











PayingthePrice.org


(PRWEB) December 21, 2011

PayingthePrice.org, an advocacy movement dedicated to educating Americans about the crisis of prescription drug pricing, has published a new article regarding the health care reform bill that passed in March 2010. The bill was passed as a measure to help Americans gain better access to affordable health care and prescription drugs. However, the PayingthePrice.org article suggests that biggest winners may not be U.S. patients, but rather large pharmaceutical companies themselves.

“This article connects the dots between the White House, Big Pharma’s lobbying efforts, Health Care reform and consumer advocate whistle blowers who called for transparency during the negotiations,” states Emmett Murphy, spokesperson for PayingthePrice.org. The research suggests that Big Pharma’s tactics of heavy lobbying in Washington and engaging in price manipulation keep the pharmaceutical companies in their powerful market position, despite the health care reform bill’s intent to put U.S. citizens’ needs first.

The Affordable Care Act, passed by Congress and signed into law by the President in March 2010, gives Americans better health security by putting in place comprehensive health insurance reforms that hold insurance companies accountable, lowers health care costs, guarantees more choice, and enhances the quality of care for all Americans. Initially, the powerful pharmaceutical lobby supported passage of the health care reform bill, but only after cutting a few deals with the White House to ensure that their interests would be protected.

PayingthePrice.org is sponsored by Jan Drugs, a licensed and regulated, brick-and-mortar Canadian Pharmacy. “Americans should be concerned about the threat of reduced access to Canadian pharmacies and affordable medications,” notes Murphy. He asserts, “Pharmaceutical company tactics like price-fixing and pay to delay are forcing Americans to pay more for their medications than citizens of any other industrialized nation.”

From covering personal drug importation issues to exposing leaked free-trade agreement negotiation documents, PayingthePrice.org gives visitors the knowledge to understand the prescription drug cost crisis and the tools to spread the word and help make a change. The website’s mission is to explore how the high price of prescription drugs places millions of Americans at risk everyday.

For more information about this compelling issue, please visit http://www.payingtheprice.org

Founded in 2003, Jan Drugs is a licensed, brick-and-mortar Canadian pharmacy regulated by the Canadian government for safety. Jan Drugs is a verified member of the Canadian International Pharmacy Association (CIPA), which has been chosen by Google, Bing, and Yahoo as the verification authority for online pharmaceutical advertisements. Jan Drugs carries prescription medication made by the leading name-brand and first-tier generic manufactures at prices up to 80 percent less than US pharmacies. Jan Drugs has helped over 100,000 Canadian and American patients get access to the high quality medications they need at prices they can better afford.

###









Attachments



























Vocus©Copyright 1997-

, Vocus PRW Holdings, LLC.
Vocus, PRWeb, and Publicity Wire are trademarks or registered trademarks of Vocus, Inc. or Vocus PRW Holdings, LLC.







Posted on December 23, 2011 by , Reply

Centice Corporation Selected to Participate in National Institutes of Health (NIH) Commercial Assistance Program (CAP)

Centice Corporation Selected to Participate in National Institutes of Health (NIH) Commercial Assistance Program (CAP)












Morrisville, NC (PRWEB) November 10, 2011

Centice Corporation, a pioneer in Coded Aperture Raman Spectroscopy and Hyper Spectral Imaging, announced today the selection of the company to participate in NIH’s Commercial Assistance Program. The NIH program is designed to assist SBIR Phase II companies who have demonstrated promising new technologies with additional resources, strategic planning expertise and broader industry exposure. Centice was the recipient of an SBIR Phase II grant in 2009. The grant was awarded to apply Coded Aperture Spectroscopy in analyzing key cardiac biomarkers in a Lateral Flow Immunoassay (LFI).

Coded Aperture spectroscopic design provides a number of advantages that were seen as necessary for better determination of cardiac events. Measuring cardiac biomarkers is faster, more reliable and less costly with Coded Aperture Design than with existing LFI reader technologies. Coded Aperture Raman Spectroscopy yields more data from a larger field of view than conventional pinhole or slit aperture designs.

“We are excited to engage with the healthcare industry to see where our technology can be applied in saving lives” said Centice CEO, Dr. Prasant Potuluri. “The grant proved there is significant value in more effectively measuring biomarkers in next generation LFI solutions.”

The poster accompanying the scientific paper presentation is available on the Centice website at http://www.centice.com under the Knowledge Center.

About Centice

Centice Corporation creates and delivers advanced sensor technologies and products to select markets in pharmaceutical development, biotechnology, healthcare, process manufacturing and homeland security. With patented Coded Aperture designs and an expertise in sensor fusion engineering, the company leads the market in low cost advantages, measurement reliability, and unsurpassed data acquisition area size. Centice’s scientists and engineering teams provide mechanical and electrical professional services to support a network of partners and integrators building sophisticated sensor solutions. Leading edge science continues to be developed in hyper spectral imaging, spectrometer design, advanced software architectures and chemometrics and compressively sampled spectrometry. Headquartered in Morrisville, N.C. and founded in 2004, the company markets products directly and through distributors. More information can be found at http://www.centice.com.

###





















Vocus©Copyright 1997-

, Vocus PRW Holdings, LLC.
Vocus, PRWeb, and Publicity Wire are trademarks or registered trademarks of Vocus, Inc. or Vocus PRW Holdings, LLC.







Posted on November 12, 2011 by , Reply

Health law is Health law is constitutional

Well, if you look around the country, there are about fifteen legal changes heading for the courts, arguing the healthcare reform brought in by the Democrats under President Obama is unconstitutional. One of the most common reasons claimed is that no US law can force people to buy insurance. Pausing there for a moment, you will immediately be thinking of auto insurance which, in all but three states, is mandatory. But there is a difference. You have an element of free choice. If you decide to buy a vehicle, then it is mandatory to carry liability coverage. Applying that to health, you cannot choose whether to fall ill so have no choice but to buy insurance or else suffer the consequences.

Except, as the millions of those who currently have no insurance will tell you, if you go to an emergency room, you can get treatment. Should you be unable to pay, the hospital and the state pick up the bill. The hospital passes on this loss to those who are insured. The state pays its share out of the taxes it collects. So the system we have now forces the current insurance companies and taxpayers to pay for treating the uninsured. That is why the healthcare reform is fair because it forces more of those who currently freeload to buy insurance. Except, before we can get to forcing people to buy insurance, we have to have a court tell us this is constitutional. Well, a federal judge in Michigan has done just that. The ,000 question has been whether the Commerce Clause entitles Congress to mandate citizens to buy a commercial product.

As set up, the majority of adults will be required to buy insurance from 2014. Removing one of the barriers put in place by the insurance industry, no company will be allowed to deny you coverage on the basis of a pre-existing condition. The test a judge has to apply is whether your decision not to buy insurance has a real effect on interstate commerce. You may say everyone has the right to decide to pay for their own medical treatment out of their own pockets. But experience shows most of those who cannot afford the current policies, cannot afford to pay for their treatment. So, looking at this across, the country, the decision not to buy puts up the premium rates for everyone that does buy. It also diverts tax revenue from other essential public purposes. The judge therefore had no hesitation in saying the changes requiring adults to buy individual health insurance were constitutional. There is no doubt this issue will go all the way to the Supreme Court. Both sides have too much to lose and will appeal until there is a final decision. No matter what you currently think of this issue, there are four years left for this to be resolved. In theory, this law will either be neutral, i.e. health insurance premiums will stay the same, or because the number of people insured will rise, the premium rates could actually fall. No matter what the theory says, we still wait for the final Supreme Court ruling. Should be here within two years.

For other highly informative insights on numerous topics from David Mayer visit http://www.hiinetwork.com/individual-health-insurance-law-changes.html. David Mayer is a professional journalist with 15 years of experience delivering news to the public.

Article from articlesbase.com

Find More The Constitution Articles

Posted on September 6, 2011 by , Reply

2009 Health Care Reform Bill, Pros & Cons – What About the Constitution?

There is daily coverage of the 2009 Health Care Reform Bill pros and cons. The coverage is incessant and well it should be. This health care plan will change our lives. However, there is a fundamental question that is ignored, what about the Constitution?

Very recently, Speaker of the House Pelosi was asked by CNS News, “… where does the Constitution grant Congress the authority to enact an individual health insurance mandate?” Her response was, “Are you serious? Are you serious?” CNS News: “Yes, yes I am.”

Later, Pelosi’s press secretary went on record as saying, “That is not a serious question.” My question: “Asking for Constitutional clarification is not a serious question?”

I have another question just how many of our Senators and Representatives do you think have actually read the Health Reform Act? Yes, I think you are right. Not very many.

Regardless, it seems to me that it is not within Congress’ or President Obama’s authority to dictate to any citizen whether an individual must carry health insurance. How about you? How do you feel about it?

It is like automobile seat belt laws. I know that there is evidence to support the use of seat belts. Still, in my naive way of thinking, I cannot accept being fined for not wearing my seatbelt. There is no evidence that my not wearing a seatbelt will hurt any one else.

So then, this law, the seatbelt law, is a law for my own good. A law passed by those that know better for my own good. Whatever happened to my unalienable rights? I realize that those unalienable rights are not part of the Constitution but they are words on which this nation was founded (The Declaration of Independence).

Some would argue that enacting a Public Health Policy requiring health insurance under penalty of prosecution falls under the Congress’ Constitutional prerogative or right and duty “to promote the general welfare”. I agree.Promoting the general welfare is Congress’ obligation. However, it is not their prerogative, duty or right to dictate the general welfare. Promoting and dictating are two distinct words with completely different meanings.

Any law that would require a citizen to insure himself for his own protection under penalty of prosecution is not promoting. That is dictating. It is enforcement, not a suggestion.

Do not confuse the likes of auto liability insurance, which is an enforced law in most of the country, with a required health insurance mandate.

Liability insurance protects you from the consequences of someone else’s actions. If someone causes harm or damage to you or your property, you have recourse. Liability insurance protects you from someone else’s negligence not your own.

Requiring liability insurance is promoting the general welfare. That mandate protects you from others. Health insurance protects you for you. It does not protect you from someone else.

Requiring me or anyone else to have medical insurance under penalty of prosecution is just plain wrong.

Maybe we should also require mandatory life insurance, so that I can pay those exorbitant funeral costs. What do you think?

There are many events and issues that deserve honest non-partisan review. Tony Perez is the editor of just such a review.

You can express your objective non-partisan opinions and comments at http://The-Independent-Voice.com. Go there now and give us your insight.

Article from articlesbase.com

Find More The Constitution Articles

Posted on July 29, 2011 by , Reply

Mandate to buy health insurance might not be constitutional

The individual mandate to buy health insurance is a key part of the Democrats’ health-care plan. Their package, if they can pass it now, doesn’t work without the mandate. But is it constitutional?

Sen. Patty Murray, a Democrat, who has been working to pass it, said it is, easily. “We have done it before,” she said, noting that Social Security, which is federal, is mandatory insurance.

But when it came to the Supreme Court in 1937, Social Security was approved as a tax and a spending program. A single-payer plan might be approved that way, but not the current plan. This is mandatory private insurance.

Requiring people to buy that, former Sen. Slade Gorton, a Republican, told me, is “clearly and blatantly unconstitutional.” He immediately sanded down that statement, however, by saying the Founders would have thought it so. Today’s Supreme Court would split on it, he said, and “it will probably be Justice Kennedy who decides it.”

The argument against the mandate is that it exceeds the powers of Congress. The Constitution lists these powers in Article 1, Section 8, from declaring war and fighting pirates to imposing taxes, borrowing money and running the Post Office. They describe a small government. It has grown large by stretching one thing on the list, the power “to regulate Commerce … among the several States … ” This has been interpreted to cover all activities that affect commerce, from racial discrimination to growing marijuana to a hundred other things.

]]>

As it said “yes” to federal power, one claim at a time, the Supreme Court kept saying there was a limit. There had to be, otherwise the commerce power would swallow up all the others and federal power would be unlimited. But in 75 years the Supreme Court has only twice said a law exceeded that limit: a gun law and a rape law. Both cases were decided 5-4, with the swing vote Justice Anthony Kennedy’s.

Now comes the mandate to buy health insurance. “The question,” said attorney David Rifkin, who spoke to the Federalist Society in Seattle last fall, “is how to shoehorn this into the Constitution.”

For some, it is easy. Stewart Jay, who teaches constitutional law at the University of Washington School of Law, and has written several histories on constitutional law, said: “Congress is allowed to regulate economic activity, and buying insurance is an economic activity.”

Case done.

Rifkin, of Baker & Hostetler, Washington, D.C, said, “there is something really weaselly about that argument.” The commerce power has always been about regulating an activity. And Rifkin said, “Is refusing to purchase insurance an activity?”

Attorney General Rob McKenna is among a group of Republican state attorneys general who may challenge the individual mandate on just that point.

“My opinion,” said McKenna, “is that it isn’t clear where the federal government would derive its authority to force individuals to buy health insurance. These are individuals who have chosen not to participate in commerce.”

I like McKenna’s argument because I like where it goes. I don’t want government to tell me how to spend the money I have left over after paying taxes. The state government may do it — with car insurance, for example — and that’s enough for me.

The Supreme Court could go either way on this. In the end, it comes down not to who’s “right” about the law, but about what people want.

Quoting & Saving just got easier…Easy To Insure ME Health Insurance Quotes… Quote all carriers in seconds

Florida Health Insurance
Georgia Health Insurance

Article from articlesbase.com

Related The Constitution Articles

Posted on July 25, 2011 by , Reply

Alex Jones Tv {Sunday Edition} 1/4:They’re Raising Taxes, But Cutting Health Care?

Alex Covers the health care bill that is about to pass on christmas eve, and shows how this is nothing more then a road to tyranny & slavery for YOU and your family!! www.infowars.com Government Health Care: The Next Step On the Road to Tyranny and Slavery www.infowars.com Kurt Nimmo Infowars.com December 19, 2009 Democrats deceptively argue that health care is legal under the commerce clause of the Constitution. The commerce clause relates to business, not individuals, but the Democrats have skewed the original purpose and intent of the Constitution. When asked to point out where in the Constitution authority is granted to force an individual — ultimately at gunpoint — to buy government health care, Speaker of the House Pelosi said: Are you serious? It is said Obama was a constitutional professor at the University of Chicago Law School (even this is a lie — he was in fact a senior lecturer, not a professor), so we should assume he has at least some knowledge of the principles of the Constitution. Obama likely knows that the Constitution does not mandate Americans be forced into a contractual agreement with a private party for health insurance. Apparently, like his predecessor, Obama regards the Constitution as little more than a goddamn piece of paper. Nowhere in the Constitution is Congress given the power to mandate that an individual enter into a contract with a private party or purchase a good or service, explains the Heritage Foundation. No decision or present …
Video Rating: 4 / 5

Posted on March 12, 2011 by , 25 comments

Ground of Bad Health: Acid Constitution

Lots people will have the symptoms of tiredness, fade of memory, sour in waist and legs, dizzy, insomnia, constipation and so on with no reason. However, nothing could be checked out if they go to the hospital. In fact, it`s all the acidic body`s fault. The characteristics of the acidic body is that its PH value of the body fluids is often lower than 7.35. Healthy people`s body fluids should be slightly alkaline, that the PH value is between 7.35-7.45.What Yield? 2010 fashion trends

Influenced by bad living habits and poor external environment, our constitution will be gradually converted into acid. 5 Incorrect Ideas You Should Remember About free british blogs The cause of acidic constitution is mainly bad living habits such as intense work, high psychological pressure, frequent smoking and drinking. To Enjoy the Most Expensive free blogs Around The World Besides, they seldom work out or do exercise outdoors. Another part of reasons are living without rules, such as stay late at night, have no breakfast. Lastly, unbalanced diet also lead to acidic constitution, such as like meat and oily food. People with acidic body tend to fatigue, lack of energy, and easy to get a cold, often feel pain on their back, and the blurred vision accompanied by ringing in the ears, feel cool on hands and feet, and being very anxious with the sensitive nerves. It is certificated medically that if the constitution inclines to acidic, the function of body cells will be worse. As a result, the waste can`t be discharged. The burden of kidney and liver will be increased. The metabolism will be slowed down. And the function of all organs will get worse. To preventing and improving the acid body, we should pay attention on the following aspects.

First of all, eat more “alkaline” foods. The production of acidic constitution is caused by the lack of alkaline substances, so we can start with diet for self-prevention and improvement of acidic constitution. Adjust the diet structure and keep the balance of nutrition absorption. Stop such ill habits as smoking, drinking. You should eat more alkali foods such as fruits, vegetables, soda crackers, or more alkali water and less acidic water such as purified water and coke. The distinction between acidic foods and alkaline foods accords to the final metabolite of foods in our body. If the metabolites contain high calcium, magnesium, potassium, sodium and others, namely, alkaline food; the other hand, sulfur, phosphorus and more, namely, acidic foods. Fruits,vegetables,bean products,dairy products and so on are alkalescent foods.While chicken,duck,fish,pork and rice are acidic foods. People often think that something sour is acidic foods, such as grape, strawberry, lemon, etc. In fact, these foods are typical of alkaline food.

Second, insure an amount of exercise. Doing more exercise and discharging more sweat could help the elimination of redundant acidic substance in body. However, as people are increasingly using cars, the amount of sport for each individual has reduced. For a long term, this can lead to the long-term deposit of acidic metabolite and make the constitution more acidic. However, more and more modern people choose to go by vehicle instead of on foot so they have largely reduced amount of exercise. If that situation lasts for long, acid metabolites will stay in the body for a longer time and then the constitution will become acid too.

Thirdly, pay attention to water drinking method. When the water boils, we usually do not turn off the fire and let the water boil for some time. But, we should note that we should open the pot lid and boil water for 3 minutes longer after it is boiled so as to evaporate the acidic substance and deleterious substance, meanwhile, the boiled water should be drunk at the same day. In addition, to improve your acidic constitution, besides diet and more physical activities, you also should ensure adequate sleep, especially avoid staying up late. And keeping a good mood is also important. Because emotions have great impact on the acidification of body fluid.

Article from articlesbase.com

Find More The Constitution Articles

Posted on January 7, 2011 by , Reply

Freedom of Religion Act and the health care system stand up for your right!


The freedom of Religion act, is in the constitution in America! Know your rights! change your diet, be free of the ways of the world which is foolishness with God, be free of diseases, sicknesses, all malidies, hosptials, doctors, medications, be free of the serpents symbol which is the Icon that gives power to all of these! Follow Gods ways and his messangers, read the book of peace, book of holy 12 , book of Enoch, that has been hidden for centruies, they didnt want you to know the truth and the key secret to life everlasting, free of all manner of diseases, know the truth that will set you free truly, not written in the bible in complete form. This is the way to paradise, garden of Eden restored, where their will be no more sicknesses or diseases or even death, all these former things will pass away. Be no part of this world Dont vote for mans kingdom!! anymore!! vote for God and his kingdom Daniel 2:44…he will set up a kingdom that will never be brought to ruiin amen!! This world is passing away and so is its desire, but if you do these things the will of God, you will remain here in Paradise to come, forever!! the whole entire world is under the influence of the watchers since Noahs day it is written in the book of Enoch, they came down here and defield the earth, making weapons and wars, and eating all manner of blood and flesh, today , they are here again, and want to take you down with them.. Be no part of the world its ways and its practices, for whoever wants …

Posted on September 24, 2010 by , 2 comments
12 » Last