Home » Posts tagged "impact"

Companies Act 2006 ? impact on company?s constitutional documents

The Constitution
by Ewan-M

From 1 October 2009 companies should be anticipating significant changes to their administration and management as new provisions contained in the Companies Act 2006 come into force. One of the areas which will require a professional review and possible amendments is the company’s Memorandum and Articles of Association. This article explains the main alterations and steps which need to be taken to comply with the 2006 Act in respect of the Memorandum and Articles.

The Memorandum and Articles of Association

The Memorandum states the company’s name, registered office address, its objects (which define the company’s power and scope of activities), authorised capital, and members’ liability. As companies can act only within the scope of their objects, defining the objects should be well-thought-out.

The Articles of Association are a company’s internal rulebook. They are chosen by the company’s members and outline their responsibilities, powers, share options and other provisions critical for running the business as efficiently as possible. It is a form of a contract between the company and its members, and between each of the members, which is legally binding on the company and all of its members.

Members can decide which rules to include in their company’s Articles, provided that the rules are not unlawful, for example are not discriminatory. It is recommended to take professional advice when drafting this document.

]]>

New rules and their implications on the constitutional documents

The Companies Act 2006 imposes new obligations on all limited companies, regardless of when they were incorporated. Apart from the Memorandum and Articles of Association, companies limited by shares will also be required to have a Statement of Capital and Shareholdings (which can be incorporated into the new Articles), whereas companies limited by guarantee will need to have a Statement of Guarantee.

Companies incorporated on or after 1 October 2009 will adopt a new and simpler than previously required style of Memorandum. The new businesses will be able to decide whether to list objects for the company or leave them unrestricted. As information on capital and shareholdings will no longer be part of the Memorandum, the newly incorporated companies will be required to file the appropriate Statement containing this information with Companies House on registration. The Statement will become part of the Articles. Directors will have to remember to file updated Statements with the Registrar as necessary.

Changes to the existing documents

Directors and members of companies registered under the Companies Act 1985 or previous Companies Acts can choose whether or not they want to make changes to their constitutional documents following the introduction of the new rules. The parts of the Memorandum which are additional to the Statement of Capital and Shareholdings will automatically become part of the company’s Articles of Association.

However, if there are changes to the current Articles on or after 1 October 2009 or amendments approved at a general meeting and agreed take effect on or after that date, the relevant parts of the ‘old-style’ Memorandum and objects will have to be included too when filing the new Articles, unless they are also amended.

Changes to the share capital after 1 October 2009 should be reported in the new Statement of Capital.

Conclusion

The Companies Act 2006 brings major changes to the way the company’s constitutional documents are composed. Those who are not sure what steps their company should take to comply with the new regulations are recommended to seek advice from government organisations or specialist firms.

Copyright London Registrars plc.

London Registrars is a firm of company secretaries, accountants and paralegals, offering a comprehensive range of business services since 1999. As a UKAS accredited firm London Registrars ensures that their bespoke solutions and legal advice are offered to the highest ISO 9001:2000 standards. Their wide range of services is designed to provide back office compliance and governance support at every organisational level. Their professional and approachable manner allows their clients to concentrate on running their businesses and benefit from London Registrars’ expertise.

Article from articlesbase.com

SLO County Sheriff’s deputies illegally search the home of Matt Hart and openly discuss how they will get away with it. To date, Matt Hart has not recieved all of his firearms back from the department, including one that the deputies expressed interest in owning. This cannot be swept under the rug. Help spread this around to help gain attention so Mr. Hart can push his lawsuit against this blatant violation of his civil rights by those deputies. We cannot allow these people to shred the Constitution just because they feel like it. Original video posted with permission from www.kccn.tv and Daniel Blackburn. Thank you again Mr. Blackburn.
Video Rating: 4 / 5

Related The Constitution Articles

Q&A: Does the Freedom of Information act and the Patriot Act impact police records?

Question by defenderinfaith: Does the Freedom of Information act and the Patriot Act impact police records?
If I am trying to retrieve police records on a closed case, does the freedom of information and patriot acts come into play? Is there a fee that I need to pay to get copies of the reports? Is there something else I need to bring to get a copy?

Best answer:

Answer by michman
You can get a copy of case records, just have the case# with you, and there is a fee.

What do you think? Answer below!

How Laptop Theft Can Impact National Security as Hundreds of Military Computers are Stolen

With laptop theft becoming one of the foremost causes of identity theft and security breach, breaking news this week revealed that even the United States Navy is vulnerable to such attacks.  Theft of military laptops can lead to the breach of sensitive and confidential secrets.  Privileged communications between military officials can be easily revealed and publicized by thieves eager to expose national undisclosed information. This article explores the dilemma now faced by the military and how stronger security is needed by even the toughest defense arsenals.

 

Early last month, investigators recovered over three hundred laptops stolen from the United States Navy.  While on a crime spree spanning three states, the thieves were able to compromise these computers which held privileged and confidential information pertaining to the Navy and its operatives. Law enforcement issued a bulletin requesting any citizen having recently purchased a laptop to ensure it did not bear a NMCI (Navy/Marine Corp Internet) service tag.  While the Navy continues to investigate these crimes, officials wait with breath that is bated for assurance top-secret data will not be revealed to adversarial nations or terrorist groups.

 

In a similar attack, Lin Poo of Malaysia pleaded not guilty to the theft of nearly 400,000 bank card numbers after he stole a heavily-encrypted laptop belonging to the Federal Reserve. Specifically, members of the Fireman’s Association of the State of New York and a New Jersey teacher’s credit union were targeted.  Poo was arrested after police caught him selling bank card numbers at a Brooklyn, New York diner for ,000 per piece. Poo, no stranger to fraud, has been previously convicted of hacking into networks belonging to the United States Department of Defense.

 

Americans are increasingly finding themselves surrounded by incidences of laptop theft. Even the Department of Defense and the Navy are susceptible to attack. One surefire way to make certain these fraudsters cannot recover any confidential data is to install Snuko, PLC’s ironclad laptop security software. London-based company Snuko, PLC has lead the way in laptop security, specifically with its BlackBox software product which can protect against even the savviest of thieves. Upon notification that a breach has occurred, Snuko can remotely lock down the laptop’s hard drive while simultaneously enabling the GPS system.  These features make it easy for the military, or any other group affected by theft, to locate the missing computers and recover them quickly.  The BlackBox technology is also able to snap a picture of the perpetrator via the on-system digital camera installed in nearly all newer-model laptops. Simple installation of this defensive security software can help any military group finding themselves the victim of laptop theft.

 

In conclusion, anyone with a laptop must protect the data and software with Snuko’s security system. It should be apparent that hackers and thieves are getting more knowledgeable by the day.  Even defensive powerhouses like national Departments of Defense are finding themselves as victims. By installing the BlackBox software, laptop thieves won’t stand a chance at recovering confidential and sensitive data, thus keeping us all safe.

 

View original article here: http://snukoantitheft.wordpress.com/2010/11/26/how-laptop-theft-can-impact-national-security-as-hundreds-of-military-computers-are-stolen/

 

Article from articlesbase.com

Related National Security Articles

State Tax Notes Announces ‘Marginal Impact’ – Bimonthly Column by Tax Experts at The American Enterprise Institute

State Tax Notes Announces ‘Marginal Impact’ – Bimonthly Column by Tax Experts at The American Enterprise Institute
FALLS CHURCH, Va., June 21 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ — States’ reliance on retail sales taxes should be good news for those who value efficient taxation, but widespread taxing of business purchases impedes efficiency and hides the true burden of these taxes, according to the inaugural issue of “Marginal Impact,” a new bimonthly column for State Tax Notes by tax experts at the American Enterprise …

Read more on PR Newswire via Yahoo! News

what is the impact of freedom of religion?

What is the impact of freedom religion? What would our country be like if we did not have freedom of religion?