Home » Posts tagged "part" (Page 3)

Ron Paul: Full Speech at the Crowne Royal Hotel in Nashua, NH (7/23/2011) Part 1

Ron Paul says going back to the constitution is moving forward not backwards. Parents use to drag their children to my events, now children are dragging their parents to see me. Ron Paul talks to a group of New Hampshire liberty activists.
Video Rating: 5 / 5

Judge Andrew Napolitano Q&A Part 2 of 2

Judge Andrew Napolitano gives a speech from the heart about freedom and from where our rights come. The Judge explains the hard core truth about the Constitution and why we must fight to regain and retain our freedoms. Courtesy of www.CampaignForLiberty.com. Edited by FreeTheNation.com Ron Paul, Rand Paul, Peter Schiff, Tom Woods, Andrew Napolitano and Daniel Hannan are the new FREEDOM FIGHTERS.
Video Rating: 4 / 5

Project Camelot interviews Dan Burisch – Part 4

Stargate Secrets: Dan Burisch revisited – Part 1 Las Vegas, June 2007 Those familiar with Project Camelot’s work will need no further introduction to Dan Burisch. In this second in-depth interview, which arose from our having presented him with a long list of questions of our own, Dan goes into great detail about both the technology and the politics of the Stargates and the Looking Glass. He also discusses the “Cube”, which may or may not be the same device as the famed ‘Yellow Book’ or the ‘Black Box’ reported by the Project Camelot witness Henry Deacon. In this fascinating interview we found Dan once more to be outspoken, challenging, informed, values-driven, mischievous, humorous, human and likeable. We also want to take this opportunity to publish an announcement, as supplied by Marci McDowell, who works closely with Dan. Marci asked us to make the following formal statement on Dan’s behalf: “Dr. Dan Burisch is on a necessary hiatus from official public contact until later this year. Unfortunately, there is very little that I am allowed to say, regarding what Dan is doing. We have informed the public that he is NOT working for Majestic. Majestic no longer exists. Dan retired from that group in September, 2006. Majestic sat formally adjourned in October, 2005. I can say that Dan’s present activities are so important, pressing and secret that those in the new group, the group which took over for Majestic at the end of 2006, the group for whom he has agreed to make
Video Rating: 4 / 5

DOWNLOAD SHARE FAVOURITE * GET THIS OUT TO AS MANY PEOPLE AS POSSIBLE ! * National Security Study Memorandum 200 cover letter- worldchinesecongress.org and www.population-security.org FERTILITY IMPAIRING VACCINE AND METHOD OF USE- www.wipo.int Are New Vaccines Laced with Birth-Control Drugs?- www.missionislam.com Phase I clinical trial of a World Health Organisation birth control vaccine 1988 PubMed- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov Frequently Asked Questions on IMMUNOCONTRACEPTION- www.pzpinfo.org Study on high level expression Porcine Zona Pellucida-4 in e-Coli- journal.shouxi.net Monoclonal Antibody PZP-4 blocks fertilisation- www.reproduction-online.org Specific Binding of 17D3 Anti-pZP mAb to Porcine and Human Zona Pellucida but not to Other Tissue Antigens- www.randc.cn Mammalian zona pellucida is an attractive target for developing a contraceptive vaccine- www.reproduction-online.org CONTRACEPTIVE VACCINES by WHO – www.gfmer.ch The WHO Task Force on Vaccines for Fertility Regulation- db.jhuccp.org CDC inoculations of Death: VACCINE INFO- www.scribd.com Innoculations the True Weapons of Mass Destruction- www.scribd.com Can the Flu Vaccine Cause Cancer or Fertility Problems, Harm Your Unborn Child, or Show Up In Your Milk?- www.vaclib.org Are New Vaccines Laced With Birth-Control Drugs?- www.whale.to PATENT Sperm antigen corresponding to a sperm zona binding protein autoantigenic epitope- www.freepatentsonline.com IMPROVED AEROSOL METHODOLOGY FOR APPLYING CPT TO CONTROL ROOSTING

Virtualisation Security – The How To Guide – Part 1

OVERVIEW

A number of security research projects have been undertaken into gaining an insight into the security vulnerabilities associated with platform specific virtualisation technologies and / or the hosting of one operating system environment on another. There has arguably been less focused research into resource specific virtualisation issues, and the allocation of specific system resources (e.g. storage and memory areas, name spaces etc.). The race for the discovery of undisclosed security vulnerabilities and software bugs with popular platform virtualisation environments (most notably those produced by VMWare Inc.) has led to a situation whereby physical virtualised resources have been largely stricken from the collective consideration of the security research community.

 

In this series of six independent technical articles from Orthus we will present an overview of much of the platform focused research that has already been undertaken, what differentiates this from resource specific issues and considerations.  As increased numbers of enterprises move towards adoption of virtualised resource technologies, and infrastructure associated with critical national security and industrial control systems also adopt these technologies, the risk exposures increase, and it is of vital significance that security research efforts are focused upon these technologies.

 

VIRTUAL REALITY

Many modern computing environments are sufficiently powerful to support the use of platform virtualisation technologies to facilitate the deployment of virtual machine instances which utilise a separate Operating System. Depending upon deployment requirements (and indeed the hardware and software vendors selected to facilitate such deployments) a platform specific virtualised environment may consist of some (or all) of the following components: virtual machine instances, guest and host Operating Systems, virtual machine monitors (VMMs), the virtual machine environment (VME) itself, in addition to hardware.

 

A variety of protection mechanisms may also be employed which range from hypervisors to appliances.  As discussed in the abstract, a considerable amount of focused security research has been undertaken concerning platform virtualisation technologies however as of the time of writing, little attention has been directed towards virtualised resource platforms. This is not to imply that these technologies are not receiving the attentions of researcher owing to the rarity of their deployment.

 

The use of virtualised resources is a growing trend, and they can be found operating in many computing environments, including the financial, governmental, health care, and military sectors.  Additionally, popular vendors of SCADA based systems and software, PROCSYS and Wonderware allow for their technologies to be scaled and deployed within virtual resources.

 

 

A number of specific business drivers may be utilised when making the decision to deploy virtualised resources, however there is a common misconception that the deployment of such assets will lead to increased productivity and reduced costs. Regardless of deployment drivers, the use of virtualised resources and a move away from the notion of network based computing models (e.g. the computer is the network, and the network is at its best, when distributed) is a growing trend that has arguably received little attention from security researchers to date.  

 

Most technical and business staff in enterprise environments understand the difficulties inherent in securing distributed environments, however the ugly kernel remains that in relation to virtualised resources the scope and impacts of security threats are rarely fully understand and addressed.

 

SECURITY IN VIRTUALISED ENVIRONMENTS

Prior to discussing the security threats and vulnerabilities that face virtualised technologies (be they platform or resource specific) the elements that constitute a secure environment should first be considered. Virtualised technologies arguably have a number of distinct elements that need to exist for them to be classified as secure. A number of researchers have focused their attentions towards defining these, most notably, Reiner Sailer et al of IBM, in the paper ‘sHype: Secure Hypervisor Approach to Trusted Virtualized Systems’[i].

 

A number of constituent security goals are defined by Sailer at al, as forming secure virtualised environments, namely:

 

Strong isolation guarantees between multiple partitions Controlled sharing (communication and co-operation) among partitions Platform and partition integrity guarantees Platform and partition content attestation Resource accounting and control Secure services (e.g. auditing)

 

These elements are an excellent starting point however they disregard a number of key requirements from a security perspective. Although Sailer et al recognise the need for isolation and separation between virtual machine partitions this should arguably also be applied to processes and users.  From a security perspective it is also imperative to ensure that not only is controlled sharing enforced for partitions but also those resources they may access (such as memory).

 

Additionally, although the necessity of auditing is recognised, the value of virtualisation lies in its inherent flexibility and, and this too should be considered especially with regards secure and scaleable deployments. Regardless of the theory of what constitutes a secure virtual machine environment, the reality remains that at present many environments are anything but.

 

A number of security research groups and individuals are conducting research into bypassing the security restrictions in place within virtual machine environments, and as highlighted in the abstract for this paper this has proved a fertile area. A number of security vulnerabilities have been highlighted in products issued by VMware Inc over recent years, and this is a trend that doubtless will continue. The VMware product suite (i.e. VMware Server, VMware Player, VMware Workstation etc.) or elements thereof, is widely deployed in many environments, and importantly comparatively inexpensive to obtain. Regardless of the individual vendor however, virtualised platform specific vulnerabilities can loosely be classed into three major groupings, namely:

 

Virtual machine / environment detection Virtual machine / environment protection bypasses Virtual machine /environment destruction

 

NEXT TIME…

In our next and second article of six we will explore how the first of these j

Notes

[i] sHype: Secure Hypervisor Approach to Trusted Virtualized Systems; Reiner Sailer, Enriquillo Valdez, Trent Jaeger, Roland Perez, Leendert van Doorn, John Linwood Griffin, Stefan Berger. IBM Research Division. February 2005.

 http://domino.watson.ibm.com/library/cyberdig.nsf/papers/265C8E3A6F95CA8D85256FA1005CBF0F/$ File/rc23511.pdf 

Sean Bennett is Commercial Director at Orthus, a leading professional services firm focused on helping organisations globally to manage risk and secure technical environments. If you need any advice or assistance with securing your virtualised platform visit www.orthus.com

Article from articlesbase.com

What part of the Constitution allows the president to get away with NOT enforcing laws?

Question by Dem Stranded on Broken Escalator: What part of the Constitution allows the president to get away with NOT enforcing laws?
It seems like presidents pick and choose which laws they will enforce — such as illegal immigration, pot laws in CA, etc.

I’m not saying that these are good or bad laws. I’m just curious whether, if you become president, you have the right to ignore laws you don’t like and do you get that right from the Constitution.

Example. Assume 0bamacare specifically says that illegal immigrants can’t get 0bamacare. But, 0bama decides he won’t enforce that law. Is that his right since he in supposedly President?

Best answer:

Answer by ndnqt1966
Seriously…..do you really think 0bama or anyone in his administration gives a second thought to the Constitution? Even Pelosi believes that as long as the Constitution doesn’t say you can’t do something….that it is still constitutional to do….

Give your answer to this question below!

RON PAUL Interview on economics – part 1

www.freeme.tv The new world order dismantling of the US Constitution is financed by the central banks of the world, and the world’s largest corporations, multinational giants that have no particularly loyalty to any country, and are loyal only to the practise of accumulating profit. These corporations give their chosen and placed senators and congressmen in both the Democratic and Republican parties millions of dollars for their election campaigns. These senators and congressmen are the most radical and dangerous this country has ever had. They do everything they can to pass laws and regulations prohibited by our constitution, laws designed to destroy the independence and freedoms of the United States, to eliminate the rights of the citizens, and to convert the United States into a ruthless, persecuting tyranny. They lie constantly to deceive the people so they will go along with the laws and regulations they want to pass. Everyone in high positions in the government takes a solemn oath to uphold and obey the Constitution, but nearly all of them totally ignore the Constitution. The president issues executive orders that are totally unconstitutional, and Congress passes laws that the Constitution specifically forbids. Our God-given Constitution is the reason the United States has become the greatest country in the world, but it is being thoroughly undermined today by the Jesuits and neocons in government as they work to destroy the United States. The laws and regulations
Video Rating: 4 / 5

bonesawpk.blogspot.com Version 1.4 of my guide is OUT for New Wild – Money making, pking tips, and much more (how i made 2b on three accounts) Watch the video in High Definition. *Note: This is not my Foe account, I use Bonesaw-Pk (Single space) for pk trips which is maxed out pure with 21 defence.* Stats when i made this video: Bonesaw–PK (Two Spaces) Low level Turmoil Madness: 90/90 Combat 60/60 Attack 90/90 Strength 30/30 Defence 90/90 Constitution (HP) 99/99 Range 78/94 Magic How i Trained My Stats on this account: Money: Most of my money hunting Grenwalls (Back when it was 3M an hr), Chins, Picking Fungi, etc. I did NOT make any my money merchanting. [Range] 1-60 at Crabs, 60-76 at experiments, 76-86 at Soul Wars, 86-99 Chinned at Monkey Madness Dungeon [Strength] 59-65 at Spirit Warriors, 65-70 at Armoured Zombies, 70-90 At Mighty Banshees [Prayer] 44-95 Dragon Bones at my own guilded alter — My New Turmoil Pure thats still in training. I thought id get a tasy preview vid out with some decent clips to be a filler before i make full pking video with hybridding. Ill be doing that once this account has 94 magic. Most of the people with turmoil turned maxed pures into turmoil pures, but i had to do it from scratch. Need to post a pk video? Foe-rs.com has the MOST active pking forum in any forum. www.foe-rs.comRunescape bs bh pking bounty hunter pking bountyhunter bs bh rs runescape jagex ltd upload videos p hat purple hat clan purple hats bh clans runescape di rs

Country Crock: Spreading the Margarine of Freedom When Some Prefer Real Butter (part 1)

Iraq is not the only country that the U.S. has set upon itself to “liberate”. We have a long history of lending a helping hand to our fellow man. In the past when information traveled more slowly and was less available, U.S. “freedom” efforts around the world where able to maintain a benevolent facade. However thanks to technology and Clinton’s Freedom of Information Act, we can take glimpses beyond the headlines.

The United States has had an ongoing struggle to “help” Cuba, although it is already a democracy. Yes, that’s right Cuba is a democracy, the 70 year old Castro, has been in power since 1959, much of this time as the elected President. Of course the typical American’s response to Castro is that he is an oppressive tyrant and the Cuban people wish to be set free, and the headlines we see would suggest just that. But if you look beyond the headlines you might be surprised.

Many Cubans don’t understand what Americans have against Castro after all he can’t be all bad if you really take a look. Just take education and healthcare for example. Despite the U.S. imposed global economic isolation of Cuba the Cuban educational system has been ranked higher than the United States. In 2001 Cuba was even put forth as a model for our own educational system during a Harvard Graduate School of Education Conference. Also more Cubans have access to medical care than Americans. So ask yourself, how can this be? Why would a tyrannical dictator put so much effort into the care and education his oppressed people?

Yes, yes it is agreed that things could be better in Cuba, but then again things could be better in Detroit Michigan as well. Parts of the 313 are in no better shape with all the resources that the U.S. government has. Castro cannot take all the blame for Cuba’s economic situation; the United States has had more than a small part to play. The U.S. has sanctioned and blocked foreign trade to Cuba since 1950’s. In 2004 while we were all distracted by the war, Bush Jr. tightened the squeeze on Cuba with harsher sanctions. In Bush’s own words, “the happy day when Castro’s regime is no more”. (by now you should be able to translate his babble)

First of all what has the 70 year old Castro done against the U.S. recently? Isn’t this all because Cuba will not play nice and let the U.S. use it as a strategic military base? Maybe Cuba does not agree to our World policies and does not want to give into the big bully. If we really wanted to “free” the Cuban people, why have we spent the last decade keeping them impoverished? Sanctions do not hurt the dictator, it is the Cuban people that suffer.

You begin to wonder if our intentions are so noble! The U.S. seems to have a track record in collapsing democracies in the name of democracy. And the people of these countries always seem the worse off for it.

To Be Continued…

Article from articlesbase.com

The United States Constitution – Part 2 ? Article 1, Section 1 & 2

The Constitution
by Ewan-M

 

Article. I.

Section. 1.

All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives.

This section of article 1 spells out WHERE the laws are to be made and both parts of this branch of government are named.

 

It also states very clearly that ‘all legislative power granted’. In other words “The Power that WE the People give to you to make laws”

Section. 2.

The House of Representatives shall be composed of Members chosen every second Year by the People of the several States, and the Electors in each State shall have the Qualifications requisite for Electors of the most numerous Branch of the State Legislature.

Representatives of the states will stand for election every 2 years. They will be elected by the people that legally live in the state that the representative will represent. The framers of the Constitution understood that this body will have the largest number of elected officials in it.


No Person shall be a Representative who shall not have attained to the Age of twenty five Years, and been seven Years a Citizen of the United States, and who shall not, when elected, be an Inhabitant of that State in which he shall be chosen.

In order to be a representative, a candidate must be (at least) 25 years old.

That candidate must be a citizen of the Unites States for (at least) Seven years.

Finally, a person standing for election to this body must legally live in the state they wish to represent.


Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three fifths of all other Persons.

 

Representatives (congressman) shall be allocated from the states in accordance with the number of people that are in each state. Large States: more reps, Small states: less reps. The tax burden will be allocated the same way. The count will consist of Free People, those hired for work and it will not include (native-Americans) Indians. All others, for purposes of representation and taxes will be counted as 3/5 people. This last was done so that the slave trade could be abolished in due time.

 

The actual Enumeration shall be made within three Years after the first Meeting of the Congress of the United States, and within every subsequent Term of ten Years, in such Manner as they shall by Law direct.

 

This enumeration,or ‘count’ shall occur the first time 3 years after the first meeting of congress (to allow it to begin in an even numbered year) and will be conducted each ten years after that. This has been called ‘the Census’

 

The Number of Representatives shall not exceed one for every thirty Thousand, but each State shall have at Least one Representative;

 

This is fairly self-explanatory: for every 30,000 (or portion thereof) people counted there will be 1 representative for the state in the National Congress. This itself would allow for more representatives for larger states.

 

and until such enumeration shall be made, the State of New Hampshire shall be entitled to chuse three, Massachusetts eight, Rhode-Island and Providence Plantations one, Connecticut five, New-York six, New Jersey four, Pennsylvania eight, Delaware one, Maryland six, Virginia ten, North Carolina five, South Carolina five, and Georgia three.

This portion established the representatives to the first congress to be elected to get everything going.


When vacancies happen in the Representation from any State, the Executive Authority thereof shall issue Writs of Election to fill such Vacancies.

 

As vacancies occur (Deaths, Resignations, Imprisonment, Election to higher office, etc.) The Governor of the state having the vacancy will establish the procedures for filling that seat. (The representatives work for the State, not the Federal Government!)

The House of Representatives shall chuse their Speaker and other Officers; and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment.

The House of Representatives (Congress) will elect a Leader, Chairman, (etc.) called in this document the Speaker Of The House AND they will decide if and when impeachment of the President is in order.

That is an interesting combinations of responsibilities neither of which should be taken lightly.

 

 I have been an America Lover for the past 55 years!  I believe that the elected officials that do not have a grasp of what our fore fathers said and did to create this very remarkable experiment in Representative Government should be put out to pasture!

 

Please go to http://www.squidoo.com/usa-constitution/ for a very interesting examination of this document.

 

Article from articlesbase.com

Find More The Constitution Articles

3rd Part : The pagan moon cult called Islam. Islam is not a religion

The moon cult was thus well known to Mohammed and had been in existence for 3000 years before his birth. Al-Kindi, one of the early Christian apologists against Islam, pointed out that Islam and its god Allah did not come from the Bible but from the paganism of the Sabeans who inhabited northern Arabia. They did not worship the God of the Bible but the Moon-god and his daughters al-Uzza, al-Lat and Manat. Dr. Newman concludes his study of the early Christian-Muslim debates by stating, “Islam proved itself to be…a separate and antagonistic religion which had sprung up from idolatry.” Islamic scholar Caesar Farah concluded “There is no reason, therefore, to accept the idea that Allah passed to the Muslims from the Christians and Jews.”

 

Why would moon cult worship pass from the Judeo-Christian world to the Arabic? Moon cult worship has existed for millenia in the Middle East, and polytheistic moon worshipping societies, such as pre-Mohammed Arabia, were the norm, not the exception. Islam is fundamentally a moon cult, polytheistic, primitive and contradictory. Equating ‘Allah’ which is never defined nor illustrated by Mohammed with Christian or Jewish ideas of God is simply madness.

 

Islam is not a religion in the Western Judeo-Christian sense of that word. Probably the best definition of ‘religion’ is this one by Michael York of Bath Spa University College, Bath, UK who defines it as:

 

“A shared positing of the identity of and relationship between the world, humanity and the supernatural in terms of meaning assignment, value allocation and validation enactment. A religion need not accept or believe in the supernatural, but it takes a position on. Likewise, some religions deny the reality or at least value of the world, but they still take a position.”

 

Religion is largely monotheistic and an enterprise of spirituality, designed to provide a road map for living, a set of laws and ethics, and to regulate behavior through such ethics and perhaps ritual. At its core any religion must be based on some pagan practice. Religious ideas have to have antecedents. But here is the crucial difference between a real religion and a cult. In the cult, the individual has no free will, no independent power, no responsibility, no self-made destiny. He exists to please the cult and its symbol. Submission, follow, repent, and accept. Period. This is Islam. This is Nazism. This is commmunism.

 

Christianity is wholly different. There are pagan aspects to Christianity of course. Christianity was a Jewish offshoot and the Jews lived and developed their ideology in a turbulent and multi-ethnic and dimensional world. But Christianity exults the individual. There is free will. Freedom of choice. A division between the church and state. A protection of women and the weak. And there is the golden rule – ‘do unto others as you would have done unto you’. None of these concepts can be found in pagan cults. The pagan cult demands the communal and the unthinking loyalty of the mass. Christianity preaches the opposite.

 

Islam is not a religon in our Western sense of what constitutes a religion. It is a cult of obedience and submission. Hence Islam meaning submission, is a very good word choice indeed for the millenia old Arab moon cult.

Islam is not a religion in the Western Judeo-Christian sense of that word. The Koran is supremacist.  To read more, go http://www.western-civilisation.com

Article from articlesbase.com

More Freedom Of Religion Articles

Breaking The Chains of Religion: An Atheist In College! (Part 6)

Continuing my series on “Breaking the Chains of Religion”. This week I am discussing some of the challenges I faced as an atheist atv Aiken Technical College in Aiken, SC.
Video Rating: 5 / 5

This is my Final Invitation Guides, it’s a good strategy to use and the one I and other less-than-newb players used using Elder level armor, weapons, and items. For any armor or weapon questions: skiesofcrimson.com Bombardier Jewel is made with: Akito Jewel: 1 Flame Sac: 1 FlynMealPassReg: 1(eat in the Kitchen and talk to your Felyne) Guide Break Down: 1. Hit it until it falls asleep. 2. Lay barrel bomb+ 3. Repeat 1 4. Repeat 2 and use whetstone 5. Repeat 1 6. Lay barrel bomb+ but before setting them off, lay a trap to catch him. 7. Use Tranq Bombs 8. Use Farcaster to return to camp and prepare for the second Rajang. For the second Rajang you use the exact same strategy except you have the option of using your Flashbombs, and using Pitfall traps when he is enraged. Music— Rage Against The Machine – Freedom Bad Religion – Come Join Us Goldfinger – The City With Two Faces
Video Rating: 4 / 5