Home » Posts tagged "Party"

Why do blacks usually support the democrat party?

Question by paul: Why do blacks usually support the democrat party?
Anyone who looks at history can plainly see it has been the dems who have apposed equality.

After the civil war blacks were freed and given 40 acres and a mule as reparations for slavery but after Lincoln was assassinated President Andrew Johnson a democrat reversed the order and returned the lands to their white owners.

It was the republicans who passed the civil rights acts of 1866 and 1875 granting blacks protection from the Black Codes and prohibiting racial discrimination in public accommodations and amended the constitution 13th 14th and 15th amendments giving blacks freedom citizenship and the right to vote. It was the democrats who started the KKK then repealed the civil rights acts and replaced them with segregation and Jim Crow laws.

Black History Month was originally “Negro History Week” began in 1926 under Republican President Calvin Coolidge

The republican party was the Party of most blacks prior to the 1960’s, including Frederick Douglass, Harriet Tubman, Sojourner Truth, Booker T. Washington, and Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.

President Dwight Eisenhower(Republican) sent U.S. troops to Arkansas to desegregate schools, established the Civil Rights Commission in 1958, and appointed Chief Justice Earl Warren to the U.S. Supreme Court which resulted in the 1954 Brown v. Board of Education decision ending school segregation.

Republican Party, by the greatest percentage, passed the1957 Civil Rights Act and the Civil Rights Acts of the 1960’s.

President Richard Nixon who instituted the first Affirmative Action program in 1969 with the Philadelphia Plan that established goals and timetables.

The campaign for a federal holiday in King’s honor began soon after his assassination. President Ronald Reagan signed the holiday into law in 1983, and it was first observed in 1986.

President George W. Bush who supported the U.S. Supreme Court’s University of Michigan Affirmative Action decision, and spent over $ 200 billion to fight AIDS in Africa and on programs to help black Americans prosper. $ 200 billion is triple what Clinton administration offered and Bush has promised to double that amount again by 2010.

Democratic Party fought to keep blacks in slavery and was the Party that established the Ku Klux Klan.

Democratic Party from 1870 to 1930 used fraud, whippings, lynching, murder, intimidation, and mutilation to get the black vote, and passed the Black Codes and Jim Crow laws which legalized racial discrimination and denied blacks their rights as citizens

Democratic President Franklin D. Roosevelt and Democratic President Harry Truman who rejected anti-lynching laws and efforts to establish a permanent Civil Rights Commission.

Democratic President John F. Kennedy who voted against the 1957 Civil Rights law as a Senator, then opposed the 1963 March on Washington by Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. after becoming president, and later had the FBI (supervised by his brother, Attorney General Robert Kennedy) investigate Dr. King on suspicion of being a communist.

Democratic Senator Al Gore Sr. voted against the Civil Rights Acts of the 1960’s.

Democrat is the party of Senator Robert Byrd who was a member of the Ku Klux Klan, Senator Fritz Hollings who hoisted the Confederate flag over the state capitol in South Carolina when he was the governor, and Senator Ted Kennedy who insulted black judicial nominees by calling them “Neanderthals” while blocking their appointments.

Democratic President Bill Clinton refused to comply with a court order to have shipping companies develop an Affirmative Action Plan.

So why do most blacks vote democrat?
“You cannot go into a Dunkin’ Donuts or a 7-Eleven unless you have a slight Indian accent. I’m not joking”
Sen. Joseph Biden Jr.
“My state was a slave state. My state is a border state. My state has the eighth largest black population in the country. My state is anything [but] a Northeastern liberal state.”
Sen. Joseph Biden Jr
“I mean, you got the first mainstream African American [Barack Obama] who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice looking guy.”
Sen. Joseph Biden Jr
“There’s less than 1% of the population of Iowa that is African American. There is probably less than 4% or 5% that is, are minorities. What is it in Washington? So look, it goes back to what you start off with, what you’re dealing with.”
Sen. Joseph Biden Jr.
“Mr Obama could win since he was a “light-skinned” African-American “with no Negro dialect”, unless he wanted one.”
Harry Reid (D Nevada)
“I’m blacker than Barack Obama. I shine shoes. I grew up in a five-room apartment. My father had a little laundromat in the black community not far from where we lived.”
Rod Blagojevish (D Chicago, Illinois)
“Everybody likes to go to Geneva. I used to do it for the Law of the Sea conferences and you’d find these potentates from down in Africa, you know, rather than eating each other, they’d just come up and get a good square meal in Geneva.”
–Sen. Ernest F. Hollings (D., S.C.)
“I did not lie awake at night worrying about the problems of Negroes.”
–Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy
“Because when you look at the way the House of Representatives has been run, it has been run like a plantation. And you know what I’m talking about.”
Sen. Hillary Clinton (D-NY)
Mahatma Gandhi “ran a gas station down in Saint Louis.”
-Senator Hillary Clinton
(On Clare




http://www.black-and-right.com/
http://www.nbra.info/

Best answer:

Answer by scott
The passing of welfare legislation by LBJ.

Know better? Leave your own answer in the comments!

The Tea Party Started In 2007 And Ron Paul Is The Godfather

News footage from 2007 mixed with other video that documents the origin of the modern day Tea Party movement and those responsible for it. It was started in 2007 from the grassroots by Ron Paul supporters for his 2008 Presidential Campaign. After gaining momentum it was co-opted by certain Republicans with help from Fox News and other corporate entities. It’s no longer the spontaneous decentralized movement that it once was though Ron Paul’s message of limited government and a return to the Constitution is still at it’s core.
Video Rating: 4 / 5

Constitution Party Launches New Website

Constitution Party Launches New Website










Lancaster, PA (PRWEB) February 21, 2004

The Constitution Party’s new, upgraded website, http://www.constitutionparty.com, is being launched today.

The Constitution Party is the only political party that stands on the principles of the American founding. It is 100% pro-life, against same-sex “marriage”, so-called free trade, pro-gun, pro-10th amendment, pro-American sovereignty, anti-globalist, and against illegal immigration.

The Constitution Party was founded in 1992 under the name U.S. Taxpayers Party and is now the 3rd largest party in the country in terms of voter registration. It has run candidates for the presidency and various lesser offices every year since its founding. It achieved ballot access for its presidential candidate in 21 states in 1992, 39 states in 1996, and 41 states in 2000.

National Party Chairman James N. Clymer said “The Constitution Party is a haven and a fortress for conservatives who have discerned how the Republican establishment has betrayed conservative principles over and over again and will continue to do so. It is also a beacon of hope for old-style Democrats and independents who are pro-national defense, anti-abortion, and strongly opposed to the de-industrialization of America.

In this election year the Constitution Party will be running candidates for the presidency, the U.S. Congress, and state and local offices.

The Constitution Party believes that this is the year many Americans will be persuaded that their vote is the currency of their conscience and that they must vote for what they truly believe, rather than wasting their vote on the “lesser of two evils”.

The time for “business-as-usual” is over. The two major parties are irreparably compromised, morally, and philosophically, and Americans must reject their policies and any other course that ensures our country’s continuing decline and eventual ruin.

Contact Information:

Alison Potter

717-390-1993

Constitution Party

http://www.constitutionparty.com


email: apotter@constitutionparty.com

###



















Vocus©Copyright 1997-

, Vocus PRW Holdings, LLC.
Vocus, PRWeb, and Publicity Wire are trademarks or registered trademarks of Vocus, Inc. or Vocus PRW Holdings, LLC.







‘God, Family, Republic’ Web Page of Constitution Party Presidential Candidate Michael Anthony Peroutka Now Up and Running

‘God, Family, Republic’ Web Page of Constitution Party Presidential Candidate Michael Anthony Peroutka Now Up and Running










Pasadena, Maryland, (PRWEB) January 21, 2004

http://www.Peroutka2004.com is the Web address for Michael Anthony Peroutka who is seeking the Presidential nomination of the Constitution Party. His themes are “God-Family-Republic.” He believes, as George Washington did, that it is the duty of all nations to acknowledge God by obeying Him. He believes that true marriage is God-created, between a man and woman only and requires the approval of no government. And he wants to restore our original representative Constitutional republic — which was never a “democracy.”

One of five children of Anthony and Elizabeth Peroutka, Michael has served as a law partner with his brother, Stephen, for the past eighteen years in the Pasadena, Maryland law firm of Peroutka and Peroutka, P.A.. During that time he has been active in pro- life issues and has assisted and founded many organizations including “The Institute on the Constitution” that seeks to educate Americans about their own history, heritage and form of government. It was his passion for learning about and restoring Constitutional government in his home state that led him to the Constitution Party and its dedication to principle over politics.

A graduate of Loyola College in Maryland and the University of Baltimore School of Law, Michael has been active in the Constitution Party for several years and currently serves as Chairman of the Constitution Party of Maryland and is on the Executive Committee of the National Party.

Early in his professional career Michael found himself unwittingly involved in a vast criminal enterprise – an experience which dramatically altered his life’s work and helped to chart the path to his intended candidacy for public office. While employed at the United States Department of Health and Human Services as a young attorney, Michael realized that none of the programs on which he was working were authorized by the United States Constitution and were therefore unlawful.

Michael lives with his wife, Diane, and their children, Timothy, Patrick and Elizabeth in Millersville, Md. He is a Bible-believing Christian.

###


















Vocus©Copyright 1997-

, Vocus PRW Holdings, LLC.
Vocus, PRWeb, and Publicity Wire are trademarks or registered trademarks of Vocus, Inc. or Vocus PRW Holdings, LLC.







Related The Constitution Press Releases

Q&A: How can I find out who called the cops on a party using the Freedom Of Information Act in Michigan?

Question by Kim<3: How can I find out who called the cops on a party using the Freedom Of Information Act in Michigan?
Is it true that someone can use the Freedom of Information Act in Michigan to find out who called the cops on a party?

Best answer:

Answer by ZonieGirl
People can call the cops anonymously (without stating who they are).

Know better? Leave your own answer in the comments!

Judge Andrew Napolitano on The Alex Jones Show 1/2: Geithner’s Bankergate & 3rd Party Rising

Alex talks with former New Jersey Superior Court Judge and a political and legal analyst for Fox News Channel, Andrew Napolitano. Judge Napolitano hosts Freedom Watch and is the author of several books, including Constitutional Chaos: What Happens When the Government Breaks its Own Laws and The Constitution in Exile: How the Federal Government Has Seized Power by Rewriting the Supreme Law of the Land. www.judgenap.com www.infowars.com
Video Rating: 4 / 5

The Charity, Freedom, and Diversity Party — Who are You Trying to Fool?

What they are clamoring for is to lower the age of consensual sex from 16 to 12 immediately and eventually eliminate an age limit altogether. They are also asking the Dutch parliament to make it legal for television stations to broadcast hard core pornography during the day. Furthermore, they want to legalize public nudity and bestiality. In addition, they believe that everyone should get to ride the trains for free. Oh yes, and they oppose cruelty to animals.

According to a recent poll, 82% of the citizens of the Netherlands believe that their government should do something to stop the new party, while 67% agree that promoting pedophilia should be illegal. This suggests that most Hollanders are as shocked and outraged as the rest of us.

Grotesque misnomer
I see no need to become indignant and vitriolic about what is obviously a publicity stunt by an insignificant special-interest group. But when I heard about this incident, I was troubled by their choice of a name. Does pedophilia sound to you like charity and freedom? Is it really diversity?

Definitive examination
The original meaning of “charity” (from the Latin, caritas) was love or affection. The King James Version’s rendering of 1 Corinthians 13:13 comes to mind: “Now abideth faith, hope, and charity, but the greatest of these is charity.” More recently, the word has come to mean, according to Webster, “the provision of help or relief to the poor; something that is given to help the needy.”

Freedom is defined as “the condition of being free of restraints; liberty of the person from slavery, oppression, or incarceration.” Diversity’s definition is “the fact or quality of being diverse; difference; a point or respect in which things differ.”

Self-imposed victimization
By choosing these terms to denote their cause, the pedophiliacs seem to be focusing our attention on them as recipients of our charity, beneficiaries of freedom we allow them, and the objects of our tolerance of their divergence from our norms. Their name is a plea, as if they are crying, “Accept us for who we are and what we do, in the name of charity, freedom, diversity.”

Most political parties seek to focus on what they propose to do to benefit humanity (whether they ever do is another issue). Even the Communist Party uses its name to point to a principle they see as positive, the enforced sharing of capital and labor. But this party does not offer anything positive beyond their “chicken-in-every-pot” promise of free train tickets and happy, healthy animals.

Nothing on sex with minors?
The Bible has nothing specifically to say about pedophilia. It does address it indirectly when it limits the sexual relationship to marriage. Paul says, “Because of sexual immoralities (the Greek words here, tas porneias are plural), let each man have his own wife and each woman her own husband.” (1 Corinthians 7:2, see verses 1-5). Jesus quotes Genesis 2:24: “A man will leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife, and the two will become one flesh” (Mark 4:7-8; Matthew 19:5). These passages do not say, “…and be joined to a child….”

The state’s interest
In both the Netherlands, the United States, and other countries, governments have a clear interest in the welfare of children. Laws against pedophilia are designed to protect children from sexual deviants, and the prohibitions serve as a barrier (though not an insurmountable one) that urges pedophiliacs to restrain themselves from harming the children they prey upon. These laws at the very least communicate to the pedophiliac, we think you have a problem. If you will not restrain yourself, we will restrain you, both for your own sake, for this behavior is psychologically destructive, and for the present and future of our children.

Plausible lying
We live in a culture in which we are bombarded with hundreds of commercial messages every day. As Dorothy Sayers described the advertising industry in her 1933 mystery novel, Murder Must Advertise, advertising consists of constantly telling plausible lies. Should we be surprised that unpopular, even repugnant causes label themselves with titles that mislead us, quell our indignation, and justify what is wrong?

I can only ask, are the children involved receiving charity? Do they have freedom, freedom to be innocent, freedom from manipulation and abuse? Isn’t there a point when diversity morphs into perversity? Or is perversity itself about to be redefined out of existence?

All too common technique
The same kind of plausible lying takes place in other movements attempting societal re-engineering, including those promoting homosexual lifestyles, seeking the abolition of monogamy, defending abortion on demand, doctor-assisted suicide, euthanasia, etc. Plausible lying also frequently takes place in the halls of our governments. They go to war, impose tariffs, destroy ecosystems, defend torture and wrongful imprisonment, prop up shady businesses, and so on, trying to hide a multitude of sins beneath a blizzard of plausible lies. And yes, it occurs in churches as well, justifying bloated budgets, explaining away hasty pastoral departures, defending fizzled programs.

When we examine what a group stands for and stands against, we have to allow for the possibility that this kind of marketing is taking place. Rather that gulping down everything dished out to us, we should nibble tentatively, unsure how much we can believe. Knowing how often this happens, we should be quick to ask, “Who do you think you are fooling?”

True charity, freedom, diversity
Christians, at least, have a polestar by which they can assess everything: Jesus Christ and the inspired Word of God. But we also can be deceived by lies that sound plausible.

What God wants of us is deeper thinking and greater caring. Our heart must ache for the children involved with pedophiliacs. It must also ache for the perpetrators themselves. But compassion cannot condone pedophilia in the name of tolerance. It can’t condone something destructive to everyone involved; that would not be charity.

Christian compassion must run deep enough to envision freedom–a true freedom that escapes old habits and patterns of thinking, that seeks new approaches to control entrenched urges. Compassion, true compassion, must be deep enough and strong enough to say, diversity, as praiseworthy as it usually is when applied to ethnicity, race, class, needs limits for it to retain its value. Otherwise, ‘diversity,’ like ‘charity,’ and ‘freedom,’ becomes just one more plausible lie.

 

* * *

 

 

Copyright ©2006 Steve Singleton

 

Steve Singleton has a bachelor’s degree magna cum laude in biblical studies and a master’s degree in religion. He has written and edited several books and numerous articles. He has been an editor, reporter, and public relations consultant. He has taught college-level Greek, Bible, and religious studies courses and has taught seminars in 11 states and the Caribbean.

Go to his DeeperStudy.com for Bible study resources, no matter what your level of expertise. Explore “The Shallows,” plumb “The Depths,” or use the well-organized “Study Links” for original sources in English translation. Check out the DeeperStudy Bookstore for great e-books, free books, and great discounts. Subscribe to his free “DeeperStudy Newsletter” or “DeeperStudy Blog.”

 

Article from articlesbase.com

Tea Party Movement Happier With the Supreme Court than Other Branches of Government, Survey Finds

Tea Party Movement Happier With the Supreme Court than Other Branches of Government, Survey Finds











Columbia Law School Professor Nathaniel Persily

New York (Vocus) July 19, 2010

Despite a general distrust of government, most Tea Party supporters believe the Supreme Court will correctly decide difficult issues, even if they are unpopular and go against the will of the president or Congress, a new survey finds.

The survey, co-authored by Nathaniel Persily, the Charles Keller Beekman Professor of Law and Political Science at Columbia Law School, also found a majority of Tea Party supporters approve of the Supreme Court’s performance.

The results were taken from an online survey by Knowledge Networks on a wide range of issues that probed attitudes toward constitutional issues, including gun control, abortion rights, and the death penalty.

Some 1,027 people answered questions, including 456 who identified themselves as supporting the Tea Party movement. Harvard University political scientist Stephen Ansolabehere co-wrote the survey with Persily.

Some 80 percent of Tea Party backers either have a great deal or some confidence in the Supreme Court, compared to just 37 percent for Congress and 39 percent for President Obama. Overall, 56 percent approve of the job the Supreme Court is doing, compared to 63 percent of those surveyed who do not support the Tea Party.

On issues before the court, the survey found:


Eighty percent of Tea Party supporters agree the Supreme Court should recognize a right to privacy even if it is not explicitly stated in the Constitution.
Some 48 percent believe the Constitution should be viewed as a general set of principles that can change over time, compared to 74 percent of respondents who do not back the Tea Party.
Asked whether the Supreme Court should focus less on the Constitution’s original intent and more on the effect its decisions will have today, just 38 percent of Tea Party backers support that notion, compared to 69 percent not in the Tea Party.
While 72 percent of those who do not support the Tea Party approve of Elena Kagan’s nomination to the Supreme Court, just 33 percent of movement supporters back her. Persily said that number was likely held down by President Obama’s low numbers from Tea Party supporters. They gave him just a 26 percent approval rating.

The survey is a follow-up to a similar poll done in 2009. Both have a margin of error of 4 percent.

The full Tea Party survey can be read here. The results from all respondents can be read here.

Columbia Law School, founded in 1858, stands at the forefront of legal education and of the law in a global society. Columbia Law School joins its traditional strengths in international and comparative law, constitutional law, administrative law, business law and human rights law with pioneering work in the areas of intellectual property, digital technology, sexuality and gender, criminal, national security, and environmental law.

Visit us at http://law.columbia.edu

Follow us on Twitter http://www.twitter.com/columbialaw

###






















Vocus©Copyright 1997-

, Vocus PRW Holdings, LLC.
Vocus, PRWeb, and Publicity Wire are trademarks or registered trademarks of Vocus, Inc. or Vocus PRW Holdings, LLC.







Constitution Party Calls Hindu God “Demon,” Protests Art Display

Constitution Party Calls Hindu God “Demon,” Protests Art Display
The leader of the Kootenai County Constitution Party says people should be outraged by a statue of a Hindu god that’s now on display on Sherman Avenue in Coeur d’Alene.
Read more on KXLY-TV Spokane

Synthetic drug ban ‘unconstitutional’
A WA ban on the sale of fake cannabis may run foul of the Constitution and will drive the trade into the hands of illegal drug dealers, the makers and distributors say.
Read more on thewest.com.au

French parliament rejects gay marriage bill
French lawmakers on Tuesday rejected a bill presented by the opposition Socialist Party seeking to legalize same-sex marriage, despite growing public support for gay rights.
Read more on AP via Yahoo! News

Ohio Constitution Committee to Research Updates for Governing Document
The Ohio constitution could be getting a facelift in 2012. The last state constitutional convention was held in 1912, but a vote is taken every 20 years to determine if citizens wish to hold such an event. Lawmakers may initiate a “long-term plan” to update the state’s governing document with a non-partisan commission researching the desires and views of Ohioans for the state constitution.
Read more on ContributorNetwork via Yahoo! News

Third Party Presidential Debate (Full Video)

Third Party Presidential Debate with candidates Ralph Nader and The Constitution Party’s Chuck Baldwin
Video Rating: 4 / 5