Home » Posts tagged "pros"

2009 Health Care Reform Bill, Pros & Cons – What About the Constitution?

There is daily coverage of the 2009 Health Care Reform Bill pros and cons. The coverage is incessant and well it should be. This health care plan will change our lives. However, there is a fundamental question that is ignored, what about the Constitution?

Very recently, Speaker of the House Pelosi was asked by CNS News, “… where does the Constitution grant Congress the authority to enact an individual health insurance mandate?” Her response was, “Are you serious? Are you serious?” CNS News: “Yes, yes I am.”

Later, Pelosi’s press secretary went on record as saying, “That is not a serious question.” My question: “Asking for Constitutional clarification is not a serious question?”

I have another question just how many of our Senators and Representatives do you think have actually read the Health Reform Act? Yes, I think you are right. Not very many.

Regardless, it seems to me that it is not within Congress’ or President Obama’s authority to dictate to any citizen whether an individual must carry health insurance. How about you? How do you feel about it?

It is like automobile seat belt laws. I know that there is evidence to support the use of seat belts. Still, in my naive way of thinking, I cannot accept being fined for not wearing my seatbelt. There is no evidence that my not wearing a seatbelt will hurt any one else.

So then, this law, the seatbelt law, is a law for my own good. A law passed by those that know better for my own good. Whatever happened to my unalienable rights? I realize that those unalienable rights are not part of the Constitution but they are words on which this nation was founded (The Declaration of Independence).

Some would argue that enacting a Public Health Policy requiring health insurance under penalty of prosecution falls under the Congress’ Constitutional prerogative or right and duty “to promote the general welfare”. I agree.Promoting the general welfare is Congress’ obligation. However, it is not their prerogative, duty or right to dictate the general welfare. Promoting and dictating are two distinct words with completely different meanings.

Any law that would require a citizen to insure himself for his own protection under penalty of prosecution is not promoting. That is dictating. It is enforcement, not a suggestion.

Do not confuse the likes of auto liability insurance, which is an enforced law in most of the country, with a required health insurance mandate.

Liability insurance protects you from the consequences of someone else’s actions. If someone causes harm or damage to you or your property, you have recourse. Liability insurance protects you from someone else’s negligence not your own.

Requiring liability insurance is promoting the general welfare. That mandate protects you from others. Health insurance protects you for you. It does not protect you from someone else.

Requiring me or anyone else to have medical insurance under penalty of prosecution is just plain wrong.

Maybe we should also require mandatory life insurance, so that I can pay those exorbitant funeral costs. What do you think?

There are many events and issues that deserve honest non-partisan review. Tony Perez is the editor of just such a review.

You can express your objective non-partisan opinions and comments at http://The-Independent-Voice.com. Go there now and give us your insight.

Article from articlesbase.com

Find More The Constitution Articles

Posted on July 29, 2011 by , Reply

Hidden Security Cameras – the Pros and the Cons

Hidden security cameras are cameras that are concealed and whose main use is to watch over on any suspicious place or person without anybody knowing about it being there. Hidden security cameras can be bought with a vast array of options and features and are available in all shapes and sizes.

Because their primary purpose is to kept from being noticed from the public, they are often created to appear similar to other objects that have various other uses and purposes. Pens, clocks, computer speakers, smoke detectors, and cell phones all might have a hidden security camera.

A Look Back At Hidden Security Cameras

In the beginning, hidden security cameras were utilized by agencies whose primary purpose was to spy throughout the world similar to the character of James Bond scenarios. As tradition would have it these types of cameras were utilized in both commercial as well as industrial applications to monitor employees, keep an eye on surrounding perimeters, and watch over general types of storage areas.

Nowadays numerous owners of homes utilize hidden security cameras to watch over the boundaries of their properties, cars, as well as other valuables on their properties. Numerous worried parents utilize hidden security cameras to watch or spy on their babysitter as well as their children when they leave their homes in addition to spying inside their kids cars.

Advantages of Using a Hidden Security Camera

The greatest advantage of utilizing a camera that is hidden is the individual that is being monitored will have no cause to change their regular activities to hide their intentions. Frequently the only method to get accurate information of activity that is criminal is by way of a hidden camera

Drawback of Utilizing a Hidden Security Camera

You will find that there is an enormous amount of debate surrounding the use of hidden security cameras, particularly in the place of work. Numerous individuals see their utilization as an invasion of their personal privacy. This is a normal reasonable concern since it is very challenging to know when they are being used in an appropriate manner or not.

Convenience stores as well as banks have utilized hidden security cameras for many years now, this way they can prosecute thieves after the incident has occurred because both convenience stores stress the policy of “no resistance” from their employees when an actual robbery occurs.

Use by Law Enforcement

National Security Agencies as well as Law Enforcement agencies utilize secret security cameras to watch over the day to day activities of suspicious people. The application of these cameras helps to improve the national security as well as save lives. As always, there are individuals that do not agree with this policy and view them as a large type of big brother kind of invasion of their personal privacy.

You need to be careful utilizing these types of hidden security cameras since frequently similar to recording a phone conversation, if the person(s) don’t have knowledge then it may very well be illegal.

Listen to Korbin Newlyn as he shares his insights as an expert author and an avid writer in the field of security. If you would like to learn more go to Wireless Security Camera advice and at Home Security Camera Setups tips.

Article from articlesbase.com

bit.ly
Video Rating: 0 / 5

Posted on June 17, 2011 by , Reply

wats are the pros and cons of having the constitutional right of freedom of religion?

Question by Ashlee C: wats are the pros and cons of having the constitutional right of freedom of religion?
Okay, for my debate class my teacher is having us debate the resolution:” that the constitutional right of freedom of religion has wrongly evolved into the freedom from religion”. And I’m having trouble understanding what the statement means by that and I’m having trouble finding pros and con for the statement.

Best answer:

Answer by Matt R
What this topic means since i am debating it is that… All people of the US have a right to practice their own religion which is freedom of religion become wrongly evolved into freedom from religion meaning more and more people are becoming atheist and going away from religion all because of the choice to practice your own religion

Give your answer to this question below!

Posted on June 1, 2011 by , 1 comment