Home » Posts tagged "Religion" (Page 2)

Q&A: Is freedom of religion a civil right in the united states? Is this covered under the constitution?

Question by hateevilstalkers: Is freedom of religion a civil right in the united states? Is this covered under the constitution?
Is it allowed by anyone – citizen or otherwise, to practice any religion in the U.S.A? What does the constitution say ? If we do see anyone’s objections, what action can one take ?

Best answer:

Answer by Glen B
First amendment protects freedom of religion. It’s granted to all citizens natural and unnatural. Objections can be voiced but no steps can prevent anyone from practicing any religion.

Know better? Leave your own answer in the comments!

Freedom of Religion and Speech, do you think there should be any limitations on it?

Question by jazzyboo: Freedom of Religion and Speech, do you think there should be any limitations on it?
I am doing a paper on the 4th amendment about freedom of religion and speech ,and want some peoples opinions on it. Do you think there should be any limitations put on your right of freedom of speech and your religion?

Best answer:

Answer by MarIboro Man
I think there are far too many restrictions on speech the way it is. As far as freedom of religion, as long as no one else is hurt, religious practices should be legal.

Add your own answer in the comments!

Nice Freedom Of Religion photos

Check out these Freedom of Religion images:

American Thoreau
Freedom of Religion
Image by Think-N-Evolve
"I am as desirous of being a good neighbor as I am of being a bad subject."

"Disobedience is the true foundation of liberty. The obedient must be slaves."

"Nothing is so much to be feared as fear. Atheism may comparatively be popular with God himself."

"Nature is full of genius, full of the divinity; so that not a snowflake escapes its fashioning hand."

"It is in vain to dream of a wildness distant from ourselves."

"The savage in man is never quite eradicated."

"Any fool can make a rule
And any fool will mind it."

"I heartily accept the motto, "That government is best which governs least"; and I should like to see it acted up to more rapidly and systematically."

"If a thousand [citizens] were not to pay their tax-bills this year, that would not be a violent and bloody measure, as it would be to pay them, and enable the State to commit violence and shed innocent blood. This is, in fact, the definition of a peaceable revolution, if any such is possible."

"To speak practically and as a citizen, unlike those who call themselves no-government men, I ask for, not at once no government, but at once a better government. Let every man make known what kind of government would command his respect, and that will be one step toward obtaining it. After all, the practical reason why, when the power is once in the hands of the people, a majority are permitted, and for a long period continue, to rule, is not because they are most likely to be in the right, nor because this seems fairest to the minority, but because they are physically the strongest. But a government in which the majority rule in all cases cannot be based on justice, even as far as men understand it. Can there not be a government in which majorities do not virtually decide right and wrong, but conscience? — in which majorities decide only those questions to which the rule of expediency is applicable? Must the citizen ever for a moment, or in the least degree, resign his conscience to the legislator? Why has every man a conscience, then? I think that we should be men first, and subjects afterward. It is not desirable to cultivate a respect for the law, so much as for the right. The only obligation which I have a right to assume is to do at any time what I think right. It is truly enough said that a corporation has no conscience; but a corporation of conscientious men is a corporation with a conscience. Law never made men a whit more just; and, by means of their respect for it, even the well-disposed are daily made the agents of injustice."

"All voting is a sort of gaming, like checkers or backgammon, with a slight moral tinge to it, a playing with right and wrong, with moral questions; and betting naturally accompanies it. The character of the voters is not staked. I cast my vote, perchance, as I think right; but I am not vitally concerned that that right should prevail. I am willing to leave it to the majority. Its obligation, therefore, never exceeds that of expediency. Even voting for the right is doing nothing for it. It is only expressing to men feebly your desire that it should prevail. A wise man will not leave the right to the mercy of chance, nor wish it to prevail through the power of the majority. There is but little virtue in the action of masses of men. When the majority shall at length vote for the abolition of slavery, it will be because they are indifferent to slavery, or because there is but little slavery left to be abolished by their vote. They will then be the only slaves. Only his vote can hasten the abolition of slavery who asserts his own freedom by his vote."

"He who gives himself entirely to his fellow-men appears to them useless and selfish; but he who gives himself partially to them is pronounced a benefactor and philanthropist."

"Unjust laws exist: shall we be content to obey them, or shall we endeavor to amend them, and obey them until we have succeeded, or shall we transgress them at once?"

I came into this world, not chiefly to make this a good place to live in, but to live in it, be it good or bad."

"Any man more right than his neighbors constitutes a majority of one."

"Under a government which imprisons any unjustly, the true place for a just man is also a prison… the only house in a slave State in which a free man can abide with honor."

"Is a democracy, such as we know it, the last improvement possible in government? Is it not possible to take a step further towards recognizing and organizing the rights of man? There will never be a really free and enlightened State until the State comes to recognize the individual as a higher and independent power, from which all its own power and authority are derived, and treats him accordingly. I please myself with imagining a State at least which can afford to be just to all men, and to treat the individual with respect as a neighbor; which even would not think it inconsistent with its own repose if a few were to live aloof from it, not meddling with it, nor embraced by it, who fulfilled all the duties of neighbors and fellow-men. A State which bore this kind of fruit, and suffered it to drop off as fast as it ripened, would prepare the way for a still more perfect and glorious State, which also I have imagined, but not yet anywhere seen."

"My life has been the poem I would have writ,
But I could not both live and utter it."

"I hear many condemn these men because they were so few. When were the good and the brave ever in a majority? Would you have had him wait till that time came? — till you and I came over to him? The very fact that he had no rabble or troop of hirelings about him would alone distinguish him from ordinary heroes. His company was small indeed, because few could be found worthy to pass muster. Each one who there laid down his life for the poor and oppressed was a picked man, culled out of many thousands, if not millions; apparently a man of principle, of rare courage, and devoted humanity; ready to sacrifice his life at any moment for the benefit of his fellow-man."

"I do not wish to kill nor to be killed, but I can foresee circumstances in which both these things would be by me unavoidable. We preserve the so-called peace of our community by deeds of petty violence every day. Look at the policeman’s billy and handcuffs! Look at the jail! Look at the gallows! Look at the chaplain of the regiment! We are hoping only to live safely on the outskirts of this provisional army. So we defend ourselves and our hen-roosts, and maintain slavery. I know that the mass of my countrymen think that the only righteous use that can be made of Sharp’s rifles and revolvers is to fight duels with them, when we are insulted by other nations, or to hunt Indians, or shoot fugitive slaves with them, or the like. I think that for once the Sharp’s rifles and the revolvers were employed in a righteous cause. The tools were in the hands of one who could use them."

Quote Source -> secure.wikimedia.org/wikiquote/en/wiki/Henry_David_Thoreau

Nice Freedom Of Religion photos

Some cool Freedom of Religion images:

04022008
Freedom of Religion
Image by citizen higgs
…..the devil and a friend of his were walking down the street, when they saw ahead of them a man stoop down and pick up something from the ground, look at it, and put it away in his pocket.

The friend said to the devil, "What did that man pick up?"

"He picked up a piece of the truth," said the devil.

"That is a very bad business for you, then," said his friend.

"Oh, not at all," the devil replied, "I am going to help him organize it."

I maintain that truth is a pathless land, and you cannot approach it by any path whatsoever, by any religion, by any sect. That is my point of view, and I adhere to that absolutely and unconditionally. Truth, being limitless, unconditioned, unapproachable by any path whatsoever, cannot be organized; nor should any organization be formed to lead or coerce people along a particular path.

………… said Krishnamurti (1895 – 1986)

REM – Losing My Religion

Oh, life is bigger It’s bigger than you And you are not me The lengths that I will go to The distance in your eyes Oh no, I’ve said too much I set it up (chorus) That’s me in the corner That’s me in the spotlight, I’m Losing my religion Trying to keep up with you And I don’t know if I can do it Oh no, I’ve said too much I haven’t said enough I thought that I heard you laughing I thought that I heard you sing I think I thought I saw you try Every whisper Of every waking hour I’m Choosing my confessions Trying to keep an eye on you Like a hurt lost and blinded fool, fool Oh no, I’ve said too much I set it up Consider this Consider this The hint of the century Consider this The slip that brought me To my knees failed What if all these fantasies Come flailing around Now I’ve said too much I thought that I heard you laughing I thought that I heard you sing I think I thought I saw you try But that was just a dream That was just a dream (repeat chorus) But that was just a dream Try, cry, why try? That was just a dream Just a dream, just a dream Dream

Did Leon Trotsky support Freedom of Religion are there any quotes where he supports this ?

Question by : Did Leon Trotsky support Freedom of Religion are there any quotes where he supports this ?
Did Leon Trotsky support Freedom of Religion are there any quotes where he supports this ?

Best answer:

Answer by Will
No, he didn’t support freedom of religion. He believed religion had no place in the Soviet Union.

Know better? Leave your own answer in the comments!

Has Freedom Of Religion in this country contributed to The destruction of The Family?

Question by rabidkitty: Has Freedom Of Religion in this country contributed to The destruction of The Family?
Has Freedom of religion been translated into freedom NOT to believe contributed to

-Rise in Premarital sex
– availability of Abortion
-No fault divorce

Have these contributed to the Destruction of the family unit?

Best answer:

Answer by Bride of Squidward
Yes.

Add your own answer in the comments!

Why do liberals think that American freedom of religion applies to religions other than Christianity?

Question by : Why do liberals think that American freedom of religion applies to religions other than Christianity?
When the first Amendment said congress could not establish a religion it meant it couldn’t establish a specific kind of Christianity.

Why are “educated” liberals too stupid to realize that this is one time we ignore both the actual words of the Constitution and the “original intent” since niether actually agree with what typical conservatives agree with?

Best answer:

Answer by bi-polar-itical
and they think the GOD mentioned is the christian GOD. it is a generic term.

What do you think? Answer below!

Q&A: Don’t Liberals understand the meaning of Freedom of Religion and ILLEGAL in the State of Texas?

Question by plezurgui: Don’t Liberals understand the meaning of Freedom of Religion and ILLEGAL in the State of Texas?
Their actions have been adjudicated as ILLEGAL all the way up to the Texas Supreme Court. Now, they want to force these people to give up their Freedom of Religion anyway!
Someone should go to jail over this, do you agree? If not, please explain.
Duh, the court said seizure of the children was illegal, so why haven’t they returned the children?
Liberals in Texas have proven they have no business wielding the power over free people.

Best answer:

Answer by Dave87gn
we dont know what you’re talking about

What do you think? Answer below!

What places don’t give their people freedom of religion?

Question by littltre09: What places don’t give their people freedom of religion?
I’m writing a paper about lack of freedom of religion. If you know of any punishment that comes with practicing a religion that is outlawed it would be much appreciated!

Best answer:

Answer by Randi
arab countries

Know better? Leave your own answer in the comments!