Home » Posts tagged "Republic"

Peaceful Republic or Police State?

May 20, 2011 – Judge Napolitano on how our freedoms have been systematically wiped out since the Constitution was signed RonPaul2012.com Ron Paul Video Playlist www.youtube.com Rand Paul Video Playlist www.youtube.com Peter Schiff Video Playlist www.youtube.com Jesse Ventura Video Playlist www.youtube.com Freedom Watch Video Playlist www.youtube.com Gerald Celente Friends safetyjoe-infobomb.blogspot.com Max Keiser Video Player safetyjoe-infobomb.blogspot.com Alex Jones Video Player safetyjoe-infobomb.blogspot.com FAIRUSE NOTICE: This video may contain copyrighted material. Such material is made available for educational purposes only. This constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 USC section 107 of the US Copyright Law. judge napolitano, freedom watch,
Video Rating: 4 / 5

Part 2 of Fatal Extraction. B’stard’s plan to become a billionaire threatens the constitution, the monarchy and any ”mediorcre” family. in Britain.

Posted on November 5, 2011 by , 50 comments

‘God, Family, Republic’ Web Page of Constitution Party Presidential Candidate Michael Anthony Peroutka Now Up and Running

‘God, Family, Republic’ Web Page of Constitution Party Presidential Candidate Michael Anthony Peroutka Now Up and Running










Pasadena, Maryland, (PRWEB) January 21, 2004

http://www.Peroutka2004.com is the Web address for Michael Anthony Peroutka who is seeking the Presidential nomination of the Constitution Party. His themes are “God-Family-Republic.” He believes, as George Washington did, that it is the duty of all nations to acknowledge God by obeying Him. He believes that true marriage is God-created, between a man and woman only and requires the approval of no government. And he wants to restore our original representative Constitutional republic — which was never a “democracy.”

One of five children of Anthony and Elizabeth Peroutka, Michael has served as a law partner with his brother, Stephen, for the past eighteen years in the Pasadena, Maryland law firm of Peroutka and Peroutka, P.A.. During that time he has been active in pro- life issues and has assisted and founded many organizations including “The Institute on the Constitution” that seeks to educate Americans about their own history, heritage and form of government. It was his passion for learning about and restoring Constitutional government in his home state that led him to the Constitution Party and its dedication to principle over politics.

A graduate of Loyola College in Maryland and the University of Baltimore School of Law, Michael has been active in the Constitution Party for several years and currently serves as Chairman of the Constitution Party of Maryland and is on the Executive Committee of the National Party.

Early in his professional career Michael found himself unwittingly involved in a vast criminal enterprise – an experience which dramatically altered his life’s work and helped to chart the path to his intended candidacy for public office. While employed at the United States Department of Health and Human Services as a young attorney, Michael realized that none of the programs on which he was working were authorized by the United States Constitution and were therefore unlawful.

Michael lives with his wife, Diane, and their children, Timothy, Patrick and Elizabeth in Millersville, Md. He is a Bible-believing Christian.

###


















Vocus©Copyright 1997-

, Vocus PRW Holdings, LLC.
Vocus, PRWeb, and Publicity Wire are trademarks or registered trademarks of Vocus, Inc. or Vocus PRW Holdings, LLC.







Related The Constitution Press Releases

Posted on August 5, 2011 by , Reply

A Republic, If You Can Keep It – The American Form of Government


There is a reason we refer to “the rule of law and not of men” when discussing the American political system. It is because a republican form of government seeks to restrain the unbridled and quixotic passions of pure democracy, rather than yield to them. It also rejects the desire of the majority in favor of individual rights. Democracy seeks to assert the right of the group, but so does a mob with a hangman’s noose. There’s also a reason why lady justice is blindfolded: She is not to see the individuals, interest groups, race, or any characteristic at all of those that plead before her–her proper concern is not directed towards them; her care is to decide the law. It’s also why the question of justice as presented before judges is not one of mercy (that belongs in the will of the people as expressed through their representatives in law), but one of exacting only what the law requires be exacted. The rule of law is all about the removal of arbitrary will from its application. A judge who seeks to apply his own notions of justice and mercy (as opposed to those notions being defined by the people through law) is a judge who seeks to impose arbitrary will in opposition to the rule of law. And it is arbitrary will that is the very definition of tyranny.

Posted on November 6, 2010 by , 25 comments