The Second Amendment – America’s most vital amendment but one which is under constant threat and attack. Watch this (do be sure to watch parts 2 and 3 also.) and pass it on as widely as possible and wake up more people. Also, visit jpfo.org for other download options.
WINNIE MONSOD- IMPOSSIBLENG MANGYARI!! EARNING ONLY P720,0000 SALARY PER YEAR, GLORIA ARROYO’S NET WORTH ZOOMED TO P144.5 MILLION. HOW DID SHE DO THAT? WHAT DO YOU THINK? blogs.gmanews.tv Weeks after the PCIJ report on the President’s Statement of Assets, Liabilities, and Net Worth came out, the President still has not explained, as she must, why her net worth has more than doubled between 2000 and 2008 from P61.9 million to P144.5 million. Certainly her salary as President, which is P60,000 a month or P720,000 a year, cannot justify such an increase. One should also eliminate from the equation possible gains from stock market trading because unless she or her stockbroker are trading geniuses, making the kind of killing she would have to make to justify her net worth increases would be very improbable because of the stock market decline in 2008. Thus, she would have to show very large increases in her other income which would be most naturally attributed to the income of her spouse. This, she still has not done. Actually the Philippines has very strict laws that if implemented properly, would show unexplained wealth and possible graft and corrupt practices by government officials right away. Our 1987 Constitution mandates it. And previous to that, there is RA 1379, passed way back in 1955, which provides that… Whenever any public officer or employee has acquired during his incumbency an amount of property which is manifestly out of proportion to his salary as such …
Video Rating: 4 / 5
itsobamasfault
November 3, 2011 at 10:46 pm
@gimmefivebucks ur a dumbass!
lewis121701
November 3, 2011 at 11:13 pm
Bull Shit!! The framers saw sheeople like you cominga mile away, Why is this living, breathing Bull Shit coming from a deranged sheeople? Is O’Bama a NATURAL BORN CITIZAN? YES OR NO
Malbrojia
November 3, 2011 at 11:43 pm
@gimmefivebucks Its not laughable. They intended the citizenry to be armed like any foreign or domestic military would be. It is necessary in order to act on the right to revolution as stated in the Declaration of Independence. The right to bear arms acts as liberty’s teeth. Toothless bleeting is laughable. Quit looking to the government for your safety. Gov. exist to secure freedoms not to remove perceived dangers. Safety and freedom are inversley porportionate, gain some of 1 lose the other.
Raycing
November 4, 2011 at 12:03 am
@rahpiklz Well I was a permanent American resident for a while and now I’m a dual Citizen, but even as a permanent resident I served in the US Air Force and as my oath stated “I pledge to defend the constition of the United States of America” not whatever the constitution might be interpreted as or what it might evolve into over time. I’ve read it quite a few times and it’s very specific and meant to be set in stone.
PingOnThis
November 4, 2011 at 12:22 am
To anyone claiming that the US Constitution is a ‘living, breathing document’, you’re straight up wrong. The Constitution is a LEGAL DOCUMENT. We are not free to reinterpret contracts at our convenience, or any other law. Why should the Constitution, which was designed the way it was in order to protect the people from the government, be interpreted at the government’s whim?
What keeps the government in check if we decide that it can choose weather or not it is really bound by the constitution?
PingOnThis
November 4, 2011 at 1:07 am
@rahpiklz Then why include the Phrasing ‘The right of the people’? Basic reading comprehension here, please.
If they intended for only a well regulated militia, as you claim, the phrasing would have been: ‘A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, shall not be infringed’
rahpiklz
November 4, 2011 at 1:25 am
@Raycing how as a british citizen do you believe you have a right to own and bear arms? your calling other people out of touch?
rahpiklz
November 4, 2011 at 2:17 am
this is some pretty silly revisionist history, the second amendment was created to allow states to organize their own militias that could not be disbanded by the federal government and therefore leave the state defenseless. even if one was to take an originalist interpretation of the constitution it would be disingenuous to argue that those who ratified meant for it mean that citizens can guns on their person at any and all times. most vital amendment? that’s categorically false.
Raycing
November 4, 2011 at 2:54 am
@gimmefivebucks Okay! right after you show me the amendment that states that the Constitution is a living document….etc….blah…blah….blah….I’ll take you off of my “This guy is completely out of touch list” I say this as a British Citizen who knows what it’s like to loose my rights to own and bear arms!!!!!
jpfo1776
November 4, 2011 at 3:27 am
“Safe from idiots” – so you think some ”gun control” would affect the bad guys!? Sorry – they are the least likely to be gun free. Disarming or limiting the law abiding folks only gives the bad guys the advantage – they are one group that will always be armed – with whatever weapons they choose.
gimmefivebucks
November 4, 2011 at 4:13 am
The US constitution is a living document that must be adapted and interpreted with the times. The framers had no idea of the weapons that would be produced and available in the future. To pretend that people should be able to walk around with whatever weapon they choose is laughable.
I do agree that people should have the right to bear arms. But people also have the right to be safe from some of the idiots who do bear arms. And there are a lot of idiots who bear guns…
NYredwhiteandblue
November 4, 2011 at 5:06 am
Thank god the framers added 2a…. its the reset button…
RDLONG30
November 4, 2011 at 5:54 am
HEY sololove7777 JUST TAKE A LOOK AT HIS HANDLE @OsamaFanClub666
THAT SHOULD TELL YOU NOT TO EVEN WAIST SPIT ON THAT IDIOT.
freatork1
November 4, 2011 at 6:50 am
Narrative – “There is no mention of limitations or restrictions on the type of arms citizens can carry.”
—————————–
There’s a good reason for that: It makes no reference to “citizens” “carrying” “arms.”
The Oxford English Dictionary of 1795 defines to bear arms as: – “to serve as a soldier, do military service, fight.”
If you separate “bear” and “Arms,” it could be misinterpreted as all sorts of goofy things, like.. “hold up” your “arms,” or “carry” “guns”
leathertanner
November 4, 2011 at 7:17 am
A crock.
Those deaths were not caused by legal gun owners.
Hogwash!
The epidemic killings come from illegal guns.
DOLT!
Alrock37187
November 4, 2011 at 7:45 am
Hey if guns kill people than I can blame misspelled words on my pencil or keyboard. You little unpatriotic filth.
sololove7777
November 4, 2011 at 7:47 am
@OsamaFanClub666
HEY RETARD …. GUNS DONT KILL PEOPLE PEOPLE KILL PEOPLE … DID YOU BUMP YOU FRIGGING HEAD WHEN YOU WERE 2. AND YOU NEED TO READ THE STATISTICS AGAIN NOT THE BIASED ONES FROM THE FAG LIBERAL COMMUNIST MEDIA IN AMERICA THE STATES THAT ALLOW TRUST WORTHY LAW ABIDING CITIZENS TO CARRY CONCEALED THE STATE HAS LOW CRIME. SWITZERLAND HAS THE LOWEST CRIME AND ALMOST REQUIRES IT LAW ABIDING CITIZENS TO OWN A GUN.YOUR NOTHING BUT A GOVERNMENT CLONED SLAVE GOOD LUCK BEING A GULAG WORKER
Charles61218
November 4, 2011 at 8:36 am
Only an Idiot would place blind trust in their government that it wouldn’t become abusive and they wouldn’t have to take up arms against it! If you give up your arms then you are truly a slave to or should I say subject to it!
OsamaFanClub666
November 4, 2011 at 9:19 am
This is why I want the second ammendment to be imported into Australia because GUNS KILL PEOPLE and Australian are retarded idiots. We already have Americans killing each other in epidemic rates, so why can’t we import the second ammendment disease into Australia, so we have more port arthur massacres to kill more aussies.
Rico8458
November 4, 2011 at 9:53 am
in nazi germany they said if you want to carry a gun you must join the SS. i hope this does not happen here in america.
CrystalHunter1989
November 4, 2011 at 10:44 am
This Christian is still clinging to both his gun and his religion.
Kitswain59
November 4, 2011 at 11:02 am
FREE people own guns! SLAVES don’t!
The genocidal dictators of the world agree, gun control works. In the last century, 100M people were murdered by their own government.
And remember, if you’re for gun control, criminals don’t obey laws. You’re taking away the rights of the good Americans.
beefmageditor
November 4, 2011 at 11:25 am
Umm… yeah. Sounds like somebody needs to take a history lesson or two. Oh, and… until you learn to write a sentence, you really shouldn’t call anybody an “idiot.” 🙂
churchofruss
November 4, 2011 at 12:20 pm
long live our rights as americans & long live those who as citizens are brave enough to defend them against tyrant govt.those who wish to ignore our rights or see to have the govt take them away do not derserve liberty nor freedom,but rather slavery & death.LONG LIVE FREEDOM!!MOLON LABE!!
churchofruss
November 4, 2011 at 12:28 pm
what are you a fucking idiot?no, gangs werent in schools when it was written: however there were always been gangs who have sought to go after the innocent.any small group of people who use violence to intimidate ,that is what a gang is.now groups like that have been around for milenia.the people who could not defend themselves are who fall prey to such thing.if armed a citizen can not only protect themselves from criminals ,but the government as well.you are a idiot “beefmageditor”
memel8s69
November 4, 2011 at 12:41 pm
why do you think people seek government positions? to make money off it is their ulterior motive. they are a failure if they don’t make anything off it. the philippines is rated one of the most corrupted countries, thus the actions of politicians is expected.
thesadako66
November 4, 2011 at 1:16 pm
@greatgrandmamimz nasaan ka na greatgrandmamimz?
ray729man
November 4, 2011 at 1:20 pm
Grabe!! Garapal!! sana roomate sila ni Joseph estrada!!!! teka nakalabas na pala!!! Gloria pasok na sama mo asawa mo at anak mo! lahat na kayong mag kakamag anak!!!!!!!!! Lintek!
roczlice64373
November 4, 2011 at 1:59 pm
matuluyan na sana mga nagsasakit sakitang magasawang magnanakaw. karma na yan sa inyo! mga ganid!
JAKOMANIA1
November 4, 2011 at 2:28 pm
most corrupt president of all time.,, no conscience at all you should rest arroyo
JAKOMANIA1
November 4, 2011 at 2:51 pm
most corrupt president of all time.,, no conscience at all you should rest arroyo
ekajnayr16
November 4, 2011 at 3:07 pm
@jalmario6 SO GANUN NALANG, DI MAN LANG MABIBIGYANG LINAW KUNG NAGING CORRUPT TALAGA SI GLORIA NUNG TERM NIYA? PAG PINABAYAAN NATIN YANG ISSUE NA YAN E PARA NARIN NATING INAMIN OK LANG MAGING KURAKOT DITO SA PILIPINAS!! KASI WLA NAMANG NAPAPARUSAHAN, HANGGAT HINDI MAHULI, AYOS LANG MAGNAKAW AT GAWING TANGA MGA PILIPINO.. KAWAWA NAMAN TONG BANSA NATIN PAG ANG MGA TAO E KAGAYA MO MAG-ISIP.. TSK3!
TheGovgwengarcia
November 4, 2011 at 3:18 pm
hoy mga ulupong.. ipapa triangle ko itlog ko pag na pa kulong ninyo si PGMA.. 5B ang budget namin para ma dismiss lahat ng kaso nya, tingnan natin pag di lumuwa ang mga mata ng korap na judges
jalmario6
November 4, 2011 at 3:28 pm
INGGIT KA LANG, DI DUMISKARTE KA PARA DUMAMI ANG MILYON MO, PURO KAYO DALDAL. ANG PAGTUUNAN NINYO MGA KRITIKO KAY GLORIA, ANG PAGSULONG NG BAYAN. WALA TAYONG PATUTUNAN PAG GANYAN NG GANYAN ANG MANGYAYARI. Gamitin ninyo ang inyong mga talento sa ikabubuti ng bayan, hindi yong nais ninyong mabilanggo si GMA. Sayang ang oras.
exbf22
November 4, 2011 at 3:30 pm
Nani Perez kabit ni arroyo
gabriel38974
November 4, 2011 at 3:48 pm
Please, change our awkward constitution. Put them in jail if they are proven guilty. Don’t let them run for another election. maraming mga kriminal naglakbay-lakbay sa lansangan dahil hindi inaakusahan.
gabriel38974
November 4, 2011 at 4:26 pm
Bakit hindi pa nakulong ang magnanakaw na pamilyang Arroyo?
kailan pa? Ganito ba ka hina ang Konstitusyon ng Pilipinas?
cdo2008
November 4, 2011 at 5:24 pm
grabe!
2011barak
November 4, 2011 at 5:38 pm
we should not blame politicians.we should blame ourselves for putting them into power.and also the people we have elected into power can’t do it all by themselves they need our help too.if we want change in our country it should begin from each in everyone of us.wag nating hanapin sa ibang tao.and when we should start to change?there is no better day to start than NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!
yashiedoodie
November 4, 2011 at 5:41 pm
mukha kang pera gloria,,,,putang ina mo ka mamamatay ka rin,,,,pareho pareho kayu pti mga immigration sa airport mukha kayung pera putang ina nyo,makakarma din kayu
alfer109
November 4, 2011 at 5:48 pm
wala talgang nsosolve n kaso sa pinas may nasolve nga palpak nman tsk tsk
pichiekurt
November 4, 2011 at 6:33 pm
MGA TAONG SALOT SA LIPUNAN ARROYO CLANS….DAPAT SUNUGIN NG BUHAY
despinapjr
November 4, 2011 at 7:02 pm
Free inexhaustible energy is real!But some very powerfull ppl don’t want you and me to be free from energy costs,Get a REAL working magnet motor at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Join the energy revolution!
jethcom
November 4, 2011 at 7:53 pm
arroyo the worst corrupt, worst administration ever!!!!! i have nothing against them…but if you will compare she and her family the most evil!!…i hope P-noy can turn this around!
hannahgb2003
November 4, 2011 at 7:56 pm
I like winnie cause she is educating people when it comes to politics and that s a big help for us for a better future.. so we are not bobo when it comes to politics and choosing goverment officials… thanks winnie…
jurbinsky77
November 4, 2011 at 8:39 pm
Ang kapal ng mukha, parang si marcos.
jakerien
November 4, 2011 at 9:08 pm
I think Filipinos should be vigilant enough to know that the mere reason why politicians are fighting very hard for their political position even leading to the extent of killing people and rivals is because of their sole reason which is to gain wealth and power and not to serve the people.
siIiconbreastgrandma
November 4, 2011 at 9:24 pm
puki ng ina mo comfortwoman gloria macapagal arroyo!!!
CHABOTKID2008
November 4, 2011 at 9:34 pm
Government posts are seen as a way to accumulate wealth and not to serve the people.
alpaknet
November 4, 2011 at 9:46 pm
Noynoy huwag mong kalimutan habulin ang arroganteng magnanakaw na si Mikey Utal Bobo Arroyo!!! “Sabi ko nga Tita (W. Monsod) if they have a problem with me…..SUE ME.” Sue the pants out of this simpleton mekeni motherfker!!!!