by The U.S. National Archives

Tyrannies begin by promulgating policies of good intentions. Such intentions fool the public into allowing government to fund such programs. Feminism was accepted by most as simply fostering equal opportunity for women. So, government-funded programs began.

And so began the tyranny against fathers, family and freedom both here and throughout the western world. This article is a first of a series exposing the nature of this tyranny and how we must take back government’s tyrannical control of society to secure freedom for all.

…But the funding grew more programs which supported lobbying for more and for perverse changes in the laws – changes that denied men and fathers their fundamental rights. Feminist-instigated government policies and laws viewed their intentions as a ‘greater good’ than the rights that keep us all free – a view which is the hallmark of tyranny.

With ‘feminist jurisprudence’ established, especially within domestic-related jurisdictions, ‘greater good’ intentions like ‘best interest of the child’ or ‘safety of women’ are now used to deny the constitutional rights and protections of all – but most especially of men and fathers.

Based on both denials of rights and constitutional protections, fit fathers under divorce or paternity actions and men accused of specious domestic violence become the excuse and fodder for government control over their lives and their earnings. This tyranny has fostered the growth of a 0+ billion government-affiliated industry feeding off constitutionally deprived fit fathers and the public for its ever-increasing control and demands.

In a nutshell, this government’s feminist tyranny employs the noble-sounding greater good intentions as ‘best interest of the child’ and ‘safety of women’ for reason to justify denying men their rights and protections. The ‘best interest of the child’ principle is used in divorce and paternity actions to deny a fit father his parental rights to legal and physical custody of his child – at least equal to the mother’s.

This allows the court- and thereby the state- to virtually kidnap his child and, then demand extortion payments euphemistically called ‘child support’ for up to 20 years or more. The government-affiliated industry feeds off these payments, the continual litigation for more, and a host of other government-assisted programs to control and manipulate the father’s life, earnings, property and his pursuit of happiness for himself and his child.

If the father won’t – or most often can’t – comply with the extortion payments (perhaps 30% or more of his gross income), he’s jailed without constitutional due process under feminist-perverted contempt judgments. He can have his state license to practice his profession revoked, his driver’s license revoked by any administrator of his state’s revenue department and his passport taken to extort payments from him. If he leaves his country to secure freedom, he becomes a felon subject to 10 years in jail. The system reduces him to the status of a slave. And remember, he’s never done anything wrong – but he has been seriously ‘wronged’.

The ‘safety of women’ principle is used both in divorce and paternity suits and in any domestic circumstance to throw a man out of his house and restrict where he can go. It only takes an ‘accusation of abuse’ – no trial, i.e. no rules of evidence to punish him. By law, ‘abuse’ can be a subjective – and not even physical – state of the ‘woman’s (read victim’s) mind. He can be thrown in jail until a hearing – perhaps for 3 months; but if he admits he abused, he’ll be let out so he can keep his job. That’s a good way to get those phony ‘abuse numbers’ up to justify more abuse programs; extortion works wonders.

No constitutional due process to protect against false accusations means that innocent men are thrown out of their houses, lose their possessions, denied seeing their kids, and go to jail – all the time. And, of course, it means a malicious woman can count on the feminist’s government tyranny to help her steal a man’s rights, property, income and children.

Is what I’ve quickly summarized about the circumstance that men and fathers face true?

Yes. But why should you believe it to be true? You should because the constitutional protections – i.e. our fundamental rights and the high standard of due process protecting them is wholly ignored for men and fathers put into divorce, paternity actions and domestic violence actions.

The aptly named government-affiliated child support and domestic violence industry’s enormous funding allows it to propagandize the inherent ‘badness of men’. That fathers run away from marriage or don’t want to support their children. That they don’t have the best interest of their child at heart nor the safety of women.

That’s phony propaganda. But it’s important to vilify those who you’ll deny rights to. That’s the way tyrannies always work.