Ron Paul’s speech tells a strong story! He is for all American’s and he believes in the Constitution of the United States of America! Ron Paul is the leading person in the debates and should receive the nomination as the Republican Presidential Candidate. Unlike Rick Perry, Ron Paul won’t sell us out. Rick “The Traitor” Perry didn’t have the guts to show up at the Iowa Straw Poll, nor the debate earlier this week. One thing Texans haven’t forgot is that he sold them out with the bill that was supposed to remove the TSA out of the State of Texas. Most Texans have said the will not vote for him because he is a sell out and is controlled by the Bilderberg Group who also approved it for him to run this election round, back in 2007… He attended the same secret meeting that Obama and Clinton did and became a significant player in the organization. Perry is a traitor to his state and therefore is a traitor to the USA!!
Video Rating: 5 / 5
oathkeepers.org Oath Keepers founder Stewart Rhodes explains Oath Keepers mission during the first annual Oath Keepers Conference in October 2009. www.youtube.com Meet David Berry: www.youtube.com Meet Eddie & Ada Gilbert: www.youtube.com stewart-rhodes.blogspot.com “This is my old, private blog that is now sadly neglected since I have launched Oath Keepers, which has truly taken off like a rocket, leaving me no time for personal blogging – not that I’m complaining. the Oath Keepers mission is very important, and worth the time and effort. Go here: www.oathkeepers.org However, if you want to see what prompted me to finally launch Oath Keepers, there are several posts on this blog that show my thinking. Back in 2006 I wrote several scathing criticisms of the Bush Administration’s absurd and dangerous claims of nearly unlimited executive “war” powers. Those articles built on my research at Yale Law School (where I won the Miller Prize for best paper on the Bill of Rights). One of the most common refrains I get from Obama supporters is “where were you when Bush was violating the Constitution.” Well, I was right here. Read this:” stewart-rhodes.blogspot.com OATH KEEPERS is a non-partisan association of Military, Veterans, and peace officers who will honor their oaths to defend the Constitution, will NOT just follow orders, will stand for liberty, and will save the Republic, so help us God. Our motto is: “Not on Our Watch!” SUMMARY LIST OF ORDERS WE WILL NOT OBEY: 1. We will …
isofaster
September 1, 2011 at 11:00 pm
“the real secret to getting 4,828 votes for the win was that the candidate bought 6,000 $30 ballots for $180,000 and passed them out to supporters.
“Bachmann got a commanding 80 percent of the votes she paid for,” Steven Colbert observed. ”
Bachmann didn’t win anything , she bought and paid for her votes , and still barely managed a fraction of a percent ahead of Ron Paul .
ryanshaunkelly
September 1, 2011 at 11:51 pm
America where are you now?
Don’t you care about your sons and daughters?
Don’t you know we need you now
We can’t fight alone against the monster
/watch?v=Vfkpi8Q_pVc
Monster Suicide America
MrSokitumi0007
September 2, 2011 at 12:04 am
You know where america fk up with me at? when the schools said that i cant stop someone well rather a group of jocks beating up the nerd with the tape on his glasses and checkerd pants. So i whipped all 5 of them and i get thrown out of school but when i try to get a teacher to stop it. It only lasted minutes. Yrs later that same kid gettin beat up was goin to cop school so what do you think he`ll be like as an officer after being spit on and beat up all the time…
waypasthadenough
September 2, 2011 at 12:10 am
@stoptheshearing
Probably because they are. The military has its share of commies. Many of them will have no problem killing real Americans to enforce the NWO commie police state…
cmfluteguy
September 2, 2011 at 1:00 am
@Rachella38
Well that disqualifies them from recognizing facts.
You morons have Dunning-Kruger syndrome.
Seek help.
shorty052477
September 2, 2011 at 1:54 am
FINALLY! Someone says we are a Republic, and not a Democracy. I will stand behind this order forever!
cleanmrbroadway
September 2, 2011 at 2:12 am
@seeker2012 Your question is, who else is he talking too. If I understand you corerectly.
bmcgrew2
September 2, 2011 at 2:46 am
@seeker2012 yes what is going on here? I saw this in another one of his videos . Why is this flying?
Pangea2012Earth
September 2, 2011 at 3:28 am
@Rachella38 Please do not divide us on faith – I am an agnostic/Atheist and have to live with people hating me everyday because I do not like religion. I love the Constitution and, like many, think our country is going down the wrong road. Atheists/Agnostics make up about 10-15% of our population – and believe me, you want us on your side. I try to live my life by Mathew 5 and 6 – I live my life by his teachings not by professed faith.
seeker2012
September 2, 2011 at 4:15 am
@OathKeepersOK I do support Oathkeepers but I have a problem with Stewart speaking next to our nations flag with the Gold Flange–why????—
pureaggression
September 2, 2011 at 4:20 am
STEWART RHODES FOR OFFICE!!!
hazeywolf
September 2, 2011 at 4:36 am
@7F0X7 The four boxes of liberty: “There are four boxes to be used in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury and ammo. Please use in that order”.
waypasthadenough
September 2, 2011 at 4:58 am
@UtherPendragan
The problem is you were watching a mainstream news source as anything but an exercise in seeing what lies your enemies are telling now.
Don’t understand? Follow my links. Read the quotes page first.
7F0X7
September 2, 2011 at 5:39 am
@hazeywolf I already answered your question. Anyone with a 5th grade reading level or so can interpret it. It’s clear as day on the bill of rights at least. And NO we DON’T need a new constitution. The one we have is just fine. History has shown that protests are meaningless! Even Dr. King’s protests only made it so that they could have the same lack of rights that whites had. Just look at where blacks are today (in general). Talk IS cheap, only armed revolution will accomplish anything.
hazeywolf
September 2, 2011 at 6:15 am
@7F0X7 OK then, who is to interpret the constitution then…?
I’m with you brother – we need amendments, or a new constitution if we are to re-assert the founder’s vision. SCOTUS is corrupt. Talk is cheap; why don’t you politically protest by walking San Francisco with a loaded, 30rn automatic AR if you feel so strongly, and fight for our natural rights.
Don’t get me wrong – I’m on your (our) side – I’m just stating the facts. The constitution mostly dead. Lets work to revive it.
7F0X7
September 2, 2011 at 6:48 am
@hazeywolf Easy, “SCOTUS” must be a bunch purposely trying to subvert the constitution. If you actually buy into a possibility of interpreting the 2nd amendment any other way than DON’T INFRINGE THE RIGHT TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS, then you disgust me. It’s not hate, it’s something more that the word “hate” can capture. If you actually believe in what these tyrants are doing to our constitution then Hell really will be where you should be. You would single handedly solve the problem of a just hell.
hazeywolf
September 2, 2011 at 7:21 am
@7F0X7 SCOTUS ruled 5-4 on the McDonald v Chicago 2nd amendment case, with a wide range of opinions and interpretations presented. If SCOTUS can’t uniformly agree on a clear interpretation of “the right of the people shall not be infringed,” then how you or Oathkeepers claim that every individual’s personal interpretation if the Constitution is correct and justified? Philosophically, they may be right, but until SCOTUS rules, such opinions remain legal supposition.
hazeywolf
September 2, 2011 at 8:12 am
@7F0X7 lol, well there r a lot of stupid libtards, statists, globalists, socialists, etc – and they interpret (twist) the Constitution differently than folks like you and me and often pass laws which we are all required to obey or challenge their constitutionality in court… I don’t like it any more than you do, but that’s the way it is. Not everyone agrees, so its left to the supreme court to decide… In the meantime, you can break the law and go to jail, and/or file a lawsuit.
7F0X7
September 2, 2011 at 8:47 am
2 sheeple thumbed down this video so far.
7F0X7
September 2, 2011 at 9:45 am
@hazeywolf I’ll tell your liberal friend who’s to interpret the Constitution. ANY AMERICAN WITH A 5TH GRADE READING LEVEL COMPREHENSION. IT’S WRITTEN IN PLAIN ENGLISH. Is your friend really that stupid? and NO, the “fed and state authorities” do NOT have the AUTHORITY TO SUSPEND RIGHTS! Executive orders are unconstitutional to begin with! The president can’t just open his mouth and declare his will. The constitution gives him no authority, except to sign a bill! The president works for US!
fckudup
September 2, 2011 at 10:40 am
FLAG WITH YELLOW BORDER!!! IN BCK GROUND. idn about you but my flag is red white and blue. thats it
newgirl2u2
September 2, 2011 at 11:31 am
@UtherPendragan That is scary, because they (Feds, police) will call those of us who are wanting to keep our country free from tyranny. We will be the hunted if they are calling this group of Freedom fighters, Americans with purpose, HATE, it is not that at all. Today I watched the Philadelphia police brutality of 1978, under Frank Rizzo.
.
hazeywolf
September 2, 2011 at 12:24 pm
@UtherPendragan Marbury v. Madison 1803: In one sweeping move, the Supreme Court declared that it had the power to review any law to determine if it violated the Constitution. The SCOTUS determined that it has the power to interpret the Constitution, just as it inherently has the power to interpret all laws. Current SCOTUS often rules 5-4, exemplifying meaningful difference of legal opinions. CA Prop 8 is an example of the “tyranny” of the majority doesn’t always win.
UtherPendragan
September 2, 2011 at 12:50 pm
@hazeywolf who’s to interpret the Constitution? The person who takes the oath. It is written in plain english. The SCOTUS only comes into the mix when issues that are not clearly covered come up. The president takes the same oath as soldiers. The Fed and States do not have the authority to suspend rights. They did not give them to you and they can not take them away. The only authority rests with We The People.
hazeywolf
September 2, 2011 at 1:30 pm
The Disaster Recovery Personal Protection Act of 2006 (incorporated into the Department of Homeland Security Appropriations bill H.R.5013, S.2599 – signed by Bush on September 30, 2006 and made Public Law 109-295) prohibits the confiscation of legal firearms from citizens during states of emergency by any agent of the Federal Government or anyone receiving Federal funds (effectively, any Federal, state, or local governmental entity). Many States have enacted similar legislation. Get a copy.
hazeywolf
September 2, 2011 at 2:12 pm
@UtherPendragan A liberal progressive friend explained his negative view of the oathkeepers this way; who’s to interpret the Constitution? The military, Congress, police, oathkeepers? They are all sworn to obey the Constitution, which is legally interpreted by the President during emergencies via executive emergency powers and its up to the Federal judiciary and SCOTUS to interpret the Constitution daily. The Fed and State authorities have authority to regulate & suspend “rights.”
chopper63100
September 2, 2011 at 2:23 pm
i need help this is no joke please help will you please get a hold me so i can tell you my story been wrongly charged please help lynn