Home » Posts tagged "considered"

how environmental problems can be considered a problem for national security?

Question by SYCT: how environmental problems can be considered a problem for national security?
The Earth’s resources are without a doubt dwindling. While the direct cause of this phenomenon may be debatable, there is cause for concern that competition over resources will lead to conflict within the international system. If you can write a memo to President Obama and explain how environmental problems can be considered a problem for national security, what will you write? Discuss this with reference to three problems within the global commons. Are these short-term or long-term problems? What efforts have been made to solve these problems? What needs to happen in order for the Earth’s environment to thrive in the future?

Best answer:

Answer by Think Outside the Ballot Box
Business dealings with the fascist country of Saudi Arabia might be a good place to start that memo.

Know better? Leave your own answer in the comments!

Posted on October 24, 2011 by , 1 comment

Q&A: Where can I get a Homeland Security list of groups/people who considered a national threat?

Question by Bonapartess: Where can I get a Homeland Security list of groups/people who considered a national threat?
Where can I find a list of groups and people that the Department of Homeland Security believe to be a risk to national security?

Best answer:

Answer by curious
Somehow I doubt this list is available…..good luck with that!

What do you think? Answer below!

Posted on February 17, 2011 by , 3 comments

At what point could a sitting President be considered a threat to national security?

Question by Robert S: At what point could a sitting President be considered a threat to national security?
Clearly, the individual would have been voted into office by the people. At least that is how it is supposed to work, no matter the levels of media bias and blind support the candidate may have had at the time. But, who would be held responsible for making a claim that the elected Presidents policies, perspectives, connections, lack of experience, lack of broad focus on national issues, or just plain direction could be considered a threat to our national security?

What a broad spectrum of damaging ramifications would result. Yet, who holds that responsibility to say, things are just plain wrong?

Best answer:

Answer by Caribou “QUIT” Barbie™
You can.

March on Washington D.C. and do it yourself and see what happens.

Know better? Leave your own answer in the comments!

Posted on January 1, 2011 by , 6 comments