Home » Posts tagged "Rules"

New Rules – Season 3 (part 2)

Obama decries Internet shut-down in Egypt while his own administration prepares to enact same draconian powers to crush dissent during times of political upheaval in America. Kill Switch: Obama Administration Fears Egypt-Style Revolt In US Paul Joseph Watson www.infowars.com www.prisonplanet.tv January 31, 2011 The Obama administration is busy attempting to pass legislation that would give the President a kill switch for the Internet in the United States while at the same time decrying Egyptian authorities for shutting down the Internet in a bid to deflate the unfolding revolution against Hosni Mubarak. The reason is simple — the government fears an Egypt-style revolt occurring in the US and wants to block access to the world wide web if and when it happens. Chicago radio host and occasional Alex Jones Show guest Mancow Muller called it right during an appearance on Mike Huckabee’s show this weekend. “It’s in all the newspapers, ‘Ohblahblah’, we’ve got to free up Twitter, we’ve got to free up the Internet and Facebook for these poor Egyptians — this is the President that let Wikileaks and all of this stuff happen,” said Mancow. “They create the problems and we react to fear — the the four letter f-word that controls the masses and they offer the solution, “they” being the government. This is the President that wants the kill switch for the Internet….he wants a kill switch.” “They fear….social networking, Twitter, Facebook, all of this stuff, but oh, no, we must have
Video Rating: 4 / 5

Rules of Citizenship

Citizenship and Freedom
by dbking

Introduction

“Know your individual right” (Higher profile campaign of the fortieth anniversary of the adoption of the Common Declaration of Human being appropriate).

“Individual rights and elementary freedoms are the birthright of all individual’s beings; their safety and promotion is the 1st responsibility of Governments” (Vienna Declaration and Program of Motion 1993).

“For our human being livelihood, method to citizenship is the really initial instigation” (Coined by Lay Vicheka, 2005).

“Dwell to the very best of our dignity”, I would say, is my extremely persuasion to this kind of the essay titled; Concepts of Citizenship. Till today, “the very best way to lead humankind is by means of rationalism” is nevertheless valid. Anything shall have its 1 or more purposes, but prior to gaining these kinds of the goal(s), we ought to initiate by realizing ourselves as a lot as feasible. Each day, on everyday countrywide tv, we have been brainwashed by individual rights’ issues from worldwide perspectives, the legal rights of the residents, the romantic relationship involving the rulers and the ruled, inter-condition relations, and even human being proper. The goal of this essay is to define the word “citizenship” from my viewpoint. I will draw the tips from the very basic perspectives to the extremely specific ( Cambodia ). How a individual holds a “citizenship” values.

Lately, I have been accused of “proving to be intelligent (from mainly the uneducated)”, but no matter what will happen, how hard it will be and how mistaken I am, I think that I am positively contribute to Cambodia’s nicely-becoming, and this is one particular of other contributions for Cambodia’ common excellent. Thanks for studying my write-up(s) and constructive criticisms.

Most of us holding Nationwide Identification Card, Passport and other administrative certificates; birth, marriage, and death, but we don’t know for sure what are the essences of people components. The function of this paper is to endeavor to catch the “previously-there opportunities” of every single folks as significantly as achievable.

Its Definition

I am not attempting to coin the new definition of the expression “citizenship”, given that it has been evidently defined by properly-recognized expert specialists. But I like to express my own perspective on these kinds of the abstract tactic. Citizenship, in my viewpoint, is people’s regimen activities that straight or not directly influence the government’s coverage. For instance, if a man or woman decides to go to solid the ballot, he or she is filling 1 of the concepts of citizenship, which will impact the govt. These kinds of the selection to cast the vote does impact the government’s plan, due to the fact people’s political rights is one of the most prominent coverage of the govt.

So what are the basic and central rights and obligation of citizen? It would be too significantly to record all the essential and central legal rights and obligation of the citizen, since I just want to display the route to “citizenship” and you, the visitors, are obliged to steer your personal boats.

The Correct to Living:

“Each and every Khmer citizen shall have the correct to lifestyle, private liberty, and security. There shall be no capital punishment.” Article 32 of the Cambodian constitution (1993, amended in 1999).

Don’t feel this “right” is awfully simple, as I was baffled myself as properly. The right to life has a extremely broad which means and as Smith said in his Global Human Appropriate; “other legal rights just add qualities to this correct.” So what are people legal rights to existence? I feel to make the reader effortless to comprehend, I consider Maslow’s idea on physiological desires; meals, shelter, clothing, enjoy, treatment, dignity…and so forth as the foundations of these “legal rights to living.” Just believe about these physiological requirements and then you will comprehend that your correct to existence is arisen from these requirements. The correct to lifestyle is the birthright of each and every humankind as not directly stipulated in the common declaration of human being appropriate and the charter of the United Countries Group.

We are fortunate to be born individual’s, but our individual high quality or tenet will be withdrawn if our proper to living is inadequate or non-existent. For our essence of humankind, the proper to living is extremely critical and need to be equivalent amongst all other individual people, either in the Cambodian, regional or international context. And as I quoted on the top rated; “the proper to existence the foremost duty of the federal government.” It is the Worldwide Covenant on Economic, Sociable and Cultural Protection under the law for the second generation is – in distinct, involved with the proper to existence: the proper to training, the correct to proper housing, the appropriate to interpersonal protection, and the correct to a secure and healthful doing work atmosphere and satisfactory leisure and rest time (Smith, 2005, p. forty six).

]]>

Cambodian constitution 1993 and amended in 1999 all obviously stipulated these kinds of the proper to existence: private independence and protection, the right to pick employment, get pleasure from the protection of the State, and so on. And we even see that the proper to lifestyle must be meticulously equal amongst all the Cambodian folks and the relaxation of the entire world, as write-up 31 stipulates “The Kingdom of Cambodia shall understand and admire individual legal rights as stipulated in the United Nations Constitution, the Common Declaration of Human being Protection under the law, the covenants and conventions connected to human being legal rights, women’s and children’s legal rights.”

The Right to Political Engagement:

Don’t believe this “right” is awfully not crucial for the folks in the twenties century. But why political engagement from the folks of all walks of life is crucial?

Most individuals (wrongly) assume that politics is just for only some varieties of folks; lawyers, politicians, intellectuals and other curiosity groups. Additionally, politics are not critical to them, because it does not positively or negatively effect their lives. This sort of the ignorant mentality has, of training course, extended until finally these days. When just beginning with political matter, most of the elders would say “it is none of our company, what we really should treatment is to make positive our stomachs are full, politics is nothing at all to us, it is just for the politicians and their counterparts.”

Certainly, as I mentioned above, the appropriate to existence is the most essential correct, preceding all other people, but it is difficult to make most of Cambodian folks be mindful of their protection under the law or even innate legal rights, given that political engagement is largely abstained. As we can see, Cambodian people’s legal rights like other individuals all around the entire world are assured by the point out and other lawful instruments. For instance, Guide 15 of Agreement on a Comprehensive Political Settlement on the Cambodia Conflict ” states that:

All persons in Cambodia and all Cambodian refugees and displaced persons shall get pleasure from the legal rights and freedoms embodied in the Common Declaration of Individual Legal rights and other appropriate international human rights devices.

To this finish,

a) Cambodia undertakes:

to make certain value for and observance of individual protection under the law and essential freedoms in Cambodia ;

to help the appropriate of all Cambodian citizens to undertake actions which would market and safeguard human protection under the law and elementary freedoms;

to consider successful measures to make certain that the policies and practices of the past shall in no way be allowed to return;

to adhere to appropriate world individual protection under the law instruments;

b) the other Signatories to this Agreement undertake to market and encourage value for and observance of human legal rights and basic freedoms in Cambodia as embodied in the related global devices and the related resolutions of the United Countries Common Meeting, in order, in distinct, to avoid the recurrence of human being rights abuses .

Not only the global devices, Cambodian structure also guarantees the proper to appreciate political involvement as they are the steer of their country.

Although several criticisms have been drawn on Prime Minister Hun Sen’s govt, I still claim that his federal government does have the mentality toward free-marketplace economic system and for-the-individuals coverage. What I am making an attempt to do here is just to present you the visitors that all of us currently have energy-in certain, the political energy. But our weakness is that we don’t know or might be frightened to use these kinds of the innately imposed powers.

The correct to political involvement is by now acknowledged in several Cambodian provisions and other lawful behaves, and what we ought to do now is to make people abstract concepts into realities; “the most useful of an thought is apply, individuals can be nicely-revered when they flip their tips into apply.”

Citizen’s Legal rights Vs Human being Legal rights:

It reveals significantly big difference involving Human being Protection under the law and Citizen’s Legal rights, particularly for these kinds of the perplexed entire world. So how the two legal rights show variations?

As stated by historic Greek and French philosophers, humankind is bounded by inborn legal rights; physiological wants, limitless use of pure resources, expression, dignity, movement, and certainly, these protection under the law are assured by the condition, with lawful act and other provisions as the testimonies. Nevertheless, because we are the citizens of a single condition, we are bound by the deal with the express. This commitment is the Constitution. Of training course, my aforementioned legal rights are assured by the Cambodian federal government as effectively as other governments in the planet, but a single assertion has been additional to people inborn or normal legal rights: “as long as it does not impinge with other legal rights.” This kind of the assertion has turned, I imagined, the inborn/normal legal rights into citizen’s legal rights.

Coming back back to people historic philosophers, human rights are limitless, truly the same, but such the theory does not apply anymore to our modern day civilization. To restore the public obtain and other public products, we are divided among the rulers and the ruled. The ruled vote for the rulers to hold the offices. Even though we are the kinds that pick members of parliament, we are previously predicted to comply with the legal guidelines followed by whom we have chosen, and of course, they need to comply also with what we have anticipated just before we vote for them. This stream, I call, is the mutual commitment; we are bounded by the regulations used by those we vote for and they need to also comply with our opinions. By raising this kind of the concrete case in point, I imagine, we can obviously see that human protection under the law have been flip to citizen’s protection under the law because we are the residents of one particular point out. This indicates that our protection under the law are restricted and we are obligated to spend cures for our incorrect-doings: accountabilities.

Finish

It is much too quick to view the concepts of citizenship from just handful of pages of paper; I can presume that it is not in-depth and carry very small scopes. The protection under the law to citizenship are as well broad and I think no a single can cowl them all, but anyone might hold it a lot more properly than yet another. It would consider extended to include this kind of the matter from philosophical, historical and interpersonal backgrounds, and this is beyond my know-how and target. These few papers just seem to be the initiative on “provoking Cambodian people’s already-set protection under the law.”

But how can a single have the citizenship? Education and learning, I think, is the main supply to grant such the aspiration. Educated people look to be much more on tract with existing point out of affairs, so it is the qualified versions who can see greater mild on citizenship.

What about the uneducated/very low-educated 1? Do their aspirations toward citizenship are dim? I actually believe so. I am not underestimating the uneducated/very low-skilled types, but what I am stating is for the far better tomorrow. For, the better gentle to citizenship, ones need to be knowledgeable to be on par with the government’s and worldwide affairs and other certain branches of knowledge and know-how. Let’s just take a extremely easy illustration: to have a chance to go through this write-up, someone requirements to have some functional understanding of English and interpersonal problems. Additionally, we need know-how and perspective to realize government’s authorized works and global lawful instrument which includes: treaties, conventions, protocols, and so on.

This small write-up strives to push the authorities to place far more attention to schooling; top quality education. In the event this kind of the aspiration is accomplished, the authorities will have a great deal of assistants and volunteer advisors.

For the goal for getting far more information on citizenship, you are humbly requested to watch much more global instruments, tabulated hereunder:

“Constitution of the Kingdom of Cambodia, used by the Constitutional Meeting in Phnom Penh on September 21, 1993 at its 2 nd Plenary Session. Amendments passed 4 th March 1999 .”

Deal on a Extensive Political Settlement of the Cambodia Conflict” (Paris, 23 October 1991).

“Worldwide Covenant on Civil and Political Rights”

“Conference versus Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Therapy or Punishment,” Used by the Common Gathering resolution 39/forty six of December 10, 1984 .”

“Convention on The Elimination of All Kinds of Discrimination In opposition to Females (1979)”.

“Convention on the Legal rights of the Little one, Used the Standard Meeting decision 44/25 of November 20, 1989 “.

“Global Covenant on Financial, Societal and Cultural Legal rights, Followed by Basic Gathering resolution 2200A (XXI) of Dec 16, 1966 “.

“The Constitution of the United Nations, Performed at the metropolis of San Francisco the twenty-sixth day of June, 1 thousand nine hundred and forty-five”.

“The Worldwide Invoice of Individual Legal rights, used by Basic Meeting resolution 217 A (III) of Dec 10, 1948 .”

And for our aspirations for “citizenship”, you are obliged to discover about your personal powers.

“Excellent energy comes from wonderful responsibility” (extracted from a film titled SPIDER Guy). More info of Mike Fuljenz

admintrator

Article from articlesbase.com

Find More Citizenship And Freedom Articles

Supreme Court Rules RLUIPA Does Not Violate the Establishment Clause: Church-State Experts React to Unanimous High Court Ruling

(PRWEB) June 1, 2005

The Supreme Court yesterday upheld the constitutionality of the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA), a federal law that aims to protect the religious freedom of inmates and others held in state and local institutions. The unanimous decision in Cutter v. Wilkinson reverses a ruling by the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals, which had held that the 2000 statute unconstitutionally advances religion by giving religious prisoners greater rights than their secular counterparts.

Religious freedom advocates hailed the decision, saying it would have a far-reaching, positive impact. “Cutter is a win for religious exercise in prison, but more importantly, it is a thumping victory for religion-only accommodations nationwide,” said Anthony Picarello, president and general counsel for the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty. Furthermore, Picarello said, the decision confirmed a recent High Court trend toward more religious accommodation. “There’s a strong argument to be made that the anti-accommodation reading of the Establishment Clause has been dead for a long time, but this unanimous decision removes any lingering doubt.”

RLUIPA opponents said that the decision was too open-ended and that it could lead to great disparities in the way the government treats those who are religious and those who are not. “The court fails to provide a theory of when it is impermissible for the state to treat religion better than the secular,” said Richard Schragger, an associate professor at the University of Virginia School of Law. “It has thus invited Congress to adopt legislation in areas far beyond prison administration that will treat religiously motivated persons more favorably than others.”

On March 17, the Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life hosted a discussion on the merits of the RLUIPA case, featuring Professor Schragger; Nathan J. Diament, director of the Institute for Public Affairs at the Union of Orthodox Jewish Congregations of America; and Ira “Chip” Lupu, F. Elwood and Eleanor Davis Professor of Law at The George Washington University Law School. The full transcript of the discussion is available at http://www.pewforum.org/events/index.php?EventID=70 .

In February, the Forum published an in-depth backgrounder on the case, which provides legal and historical analysis of the issues in Cutter. An addendum to the backgrounder, analyzing Justice Ginsburg’s decision and its possible impact on future cases, will soon be available on the Forum’s Web site, http://www.pewforum.org.

RLUIPA allows a state or locality to limit an inmate’s religious freedom only if it can show that the restriction advances a compelling government interest, such as maintaining prison security. The statute imposes the same standard on zoning laws and other land-use regulations that negatively impact churches and other houses of worship, but that section of the law was not at issue in the case.

The case began when a number of Ohio prisoners who are members of the Satanist religion and other unconventional sects sued the state, alleging that prison officials had not adequately accommodated their religious needs and had therefore violated RLUIPA. Ohio argued that because RLUIPA mandates religious accommodation, it is a “law respecting an establishment of religion” and therefore prohibited by the First Amendment.

Writing for the entire court, Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg rejected Ohio’s contention, arguing that the law “confers no privileged status on any particular religious sect .…” She compared RLUIPA with other constitutionally acceptable accommodations for religion, noting, for example, that a prison is constitutionally free to allow prisoners to assemble for worship even if the prison forbids inmates from holding political rallies.

“In the past, the court has said there is a zone between the government’s obligation to guarantee the free exercise of religion and its obligation not to establish religion, and that within that zone, it can legislate religious accommodation,” said David Masci, a senior fellow at the Pew Forum. “In Cutter, Justice Ginsberg has said that RLUIPA fits comfortably into that zone.”

The Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life delivers timely, impartial information to national opinion leaders on issues at the intersection of religion and public affairs; it also serves as a neutral venue for discussions of those matters. The Forum is a project of the Pew Research Center, a nonpartisan “fact tank” that provides information on the issues, attitudes and trends shaping America and the world.





More Freedom Of Religion Press Releases

Nigeria: President Must Sign New Constitution, Court Rules

Nigeria: President Must Sign New Constitution, Court Rules
Does President Goodluck Jonathan need to assent to the amendments of the 1999 Constitution to become law?

Read more on AllAfrica.com