Home » 2010 » December (Page 10)

Prevent Serious Debt Problems by Taking Action Now

Prevent Serious Debt Problems by Taking Action Now












Bills.com logo


San Mateo, Calif. (Vocus) July 15, 2009

With the U.S. economy reeling from recession, more people are struggling with severe debt, but according to Ethan Ewing, president of free online consumer portal Bills.com, individuals and families can take steps to prevent severe financial hardship.

The economic recession has left 8 million Americans unemployed and 79 million people struggling to pay medical debt. Over time, the top three causes of serious debt hardship are unexpected medical expenses, divorce and job loss.

    A 2005 Harvard study found that medical bills account for half of all personal bankruptcies.
    Among couples with children, 19 percent of mothers fall into poverty in the year after a divorce.
    As U.S. unemployment rates approach 10 percent, millions of Americans face the financial pressures of joblessness.

Other causes of significant debt problems run the gamut and can include everything from education to gambling, Ewing said. “While gaining a college education is a valuable investment, it is a painful reality that average graduates start adult life with education debt of more than $ 22,000,” he said. “In the betting arena, the New York Times reported that the average problem gambler had debt of $ 17,000 in 2004 — on an average income of $ 35,000.”

While individuals cannot always eliminate unexpected occurrences, Ewing suggested individuals take certain steps to minimize the risk of severe debt:

1.    Plan ahead with insurance. Before a medical situation arises, if possible, secure the best health insurance available. Seek out a high lifetime maximum and high-coverage percentage after deductible. One costly illness can quickly run through a $ 1 million maximum.

2.    Think of alternatives. A college education is a worthy investment, but how a student obtains it can vary significantly. Many students can cut costs by living at home while attending school, or attending an affordable community college for two years, then transferring to a more prestigious four-year institution.

3.    Rescale lifestyle. Even those who anticipate that they will soon recover from a financial blow such as a medical incident, divorce or job loss should immediately rescale their lifestyle to live within their current means. “Do not run up unnecessary debt by planning on tomorrow’s income to repay it,” Ewing cautioned.

4.    Face the facts. People who face mounting debts, such as from a serious illness or injury that runs up hospital bills or leaves them without income, should collect all their bills to learn exactly how much they owe. Then ask each creditor about options for repayment.

5.    Pay critical bills first. The most important payment to make is a mortgage. “If you fall behind on this bill, you could lose your home,” Ewing said. “After the mortgage payment, prioritize other secured debt, such as an auto loan, and then credit card bills and other unsecured debt.”

6.    Eliminate dangerous habits. “Individuals who sense they have a problem with gambling or other addictions must take a hard look in the mirror and realize their ‘entertainment’ could ruin them,” Ewing warned. Ask a doctor or call the state for resources to help resolve what could be a serious personal problem. And if you have a good friend or family member who has gambling debts spiraling out of control, be a true friend, and step up and talk to them about it.

7.    Choose debt help carefully. For those who are unable to resolve their situation directly with creditors, and who need professional help to negotiate on their behalf, Ewing advised: “Be sure you are working with a reputable debt settlement service that works as an advocate for consumers – vs. a company that may receive its funding from creditors,” Ewing said. Obligations of each party should be clearly spelled out from the beginning, with no hidden terms or fees.

“Struggling with tens of thousands of dollars of debt can be a frightening experience,” Ewing said. “If you cannot manage debt or other problems on your own, consider seeking out help. Whatever means you choose to move out of debt and forward in life, know that you are not alone, and with time and effort, the future can be brighter.”

About Bills.com

Based in San Mateo, Calif., Bills.com is a free one-stop portal where consumers can educate themselves about complex personal finance issues and comparison shop for products and services including credit cards, debt consolidation, insurance, mortgages and other loans. Bills.com holds the No. 257 spot on the Inc. 500 list for 2008, and the No. 3 spot on Entrepreneur Magazine’s Hot 100 list of the fastest-growing U.S. companies.

Bills.com and its sister companies, Freedom Debt Relief and Freedom Tax Relief, are wholly owned subsidiaries of Freedom Financial Network, LLC. The company has served more than 50,000 customers nationwide since 2002 while managing more than $ 1 billion in consumer debt. Its RSS feed is available here.

###






















Vocus©Copyright 1997-2010, Vocus PRW Holdings, LLC.
Vocus, PRWeb and Publicity Wire are trademarks or registered trademarks of Vocus, Inc. or Vocus PRW Holdings, LLC.







Related Income Tax Vs Freedom Press Releases

Christopher Hitchens at Freedom From Religion Foundation 5/7

Christopher Hitchens gives a speech at the Freedom From Religion Foundation after receiving an award. This is from October 12, 2007.
Video Rating: 4 / 5

Canada, US weigh ‘perimeter’ security: reports

Canada, US weigh ‘perimeter’ security: reports
Canada and the United States are in talks to create a security “perimeter” around North America linking security to improved access to US markets for Canadians, local media said Thursday.
Read more on AFP via Yahoo! News

Harkat security certificate upheld
Mohamed Harkat will appeal a Federal Court ruling Thursday that there are reasonable grounds to believe he remains a threat to national security, the Ottawa resident’s lawyers say.
Read more on CBC.ca

The US Constitution, 18th Amendment, Differing Views of Intent

In 1966, Lyndon B. Johnson lauded that “it is the genius of our Constitution that under its shelter of enduring institutions and rooted principles there is ample room for the rich fertility of American political invention.” This leeway for “political invention” is what makes the US Constitution a living document, since not only do its contents change with the years, but also its interpretation.

Of the over 8,000 words in the Constitution today, only about 4,500 of them are from the original 1787 document. The first ten amendments, known as the Bill of Rights, weren’t added to the Constitution until 1791 and an additional seventeen have since been added. That being said, the fact that the US Constitution is not only the supreme law of the land, but also an extremely powerful symbol of America makes it extremely difficult to know when, why, and how to amend the dang thing.

In 1856, Abraham Lincoln – the go-to president for great quotes and warm, fatherly feelings – warned: “Don’t interfere with anything in the Constitution. That must be maintained, for it is the only safeguard of our liberties.” Which is more than a little ironic coming from a guy who not only suspended the writ of habeas corpus (which protects citizens against illegal imprisonment) just five years later, but also added the 13th Amendment to the Constitution during his short presidency. Lincoln clearly didn’t believe that maintaining the integrity of the Constitution meant serenading it to the tune of “Don’t Go Changin’.”

This opens up the nasty can of worms that is the letter of the law vs. the spirit of the law. Those who interpret the Constitution strictly argue that it was written by some of the brightest and best minds in American history, who thought long and hard about their exact word choice so that future generations wouldn’t have to. Those in favor of a more elastic interpretation, however, cite the document’s various instances of “historical flavor” to argue that the Constitution must be interpreted in accordance with the times; for instance, up until it was stricken from the document after the Civil War, part of Article I Section 2 of the Constitution referred to a slave as 3/5 of a person for census-taking purposes.

Of all the amendments added to the Constitution, only one was ever considered a bad enough idea to merit annulment. Passed in 1917 after years of hard campaigning by the temperance movement, the 18th Amendment legalized prohibition nationwide. Not only was the ban on alcohol completely ineffective, but it actually fueled a powerful underworld of crime and bootlegging (à la Great Gatsby) that give rise to mafia criminals such as Al Capone. Nevertheless, it took over 14 years before the 18th Amendment was repealed via the 21st Amendment.

In general, the more contentious parts of the Constitution are altered not through sweeping written changes, but through differences in interpretation. In 1907, New York mayor and future Supreme Court Justice Charles Evans Hughes famously said that “the Constitution is what the judges say it is.” Pretty hard to argue with, considering the historical context; since the 1880’s, the Supreme Court had been interpreting the word “people” in the Equal Protection clause of the 14th Amendment to include corporations, thereby severely restricting the government’s ability to regulate the abuses of big business.

The Supreme Court’s huge influence over constitutional law is the reason why all Supreme Court nominations undergo such harsh and prolonged scrutiny before being accepted to the bench. Perhaps Supreme Court Justice Hugo Black best expressed our ongoing concern over judges when he insisted in 1970 that the “Constitution was not written in the sands to be washed away by each wave of new judges.”

Shmoop is an online study guide for English Literature, Civics and US history. Its content is written by Ph.D. and Masters students from top universities, like Stanford, Berkeley, Harvard, and Yale who have also taught at the high school and college levels. Teachers and students should feel confident to cite Shmoop.

Article from articlesbase.com

More The Constitution Articles

Canada Immigration Newsletter

(PRWEB) November 13, 2004

1. CITIZENSHIP WEEK: Celebrating Freedom, Respect, and Belonging

The Honourable Judy Sgro, Minister of Citizenship and Immigration, today announced the launch of Canada’s Citizenship Week from October 18–24, 2004.

“Citizenship Week is a time to reflect on the values that speak to the heart of being a Canadian,” said Minister Sgro. “Citizenship Week is intended to help remind all Canadians — young and old, born in Canada or abroad — that we all have a right to belong and be proud of our country.”

To launch Canada’s Citizenship Week, Citizenship Judge Suzanne Pinel presided over a reaffirmation ceremony with Grade 5 and 6 students at Elgin Public School. Minister Sgro also attended the ceremony along with Jason Dunkerley, Paralympics medalist and recent Canadian citizen.

In schools, community and cultural centers and offices, many new Canadians will take the oath of citizenship in ceremonies from coast to coast and others will reaffirm their citizenship at these events by publicly reciting the oath of citizenship.

“Immigrants bring valuable contributions to Canada’s social, cultural and economic fabric. I encourage all Canadians to help newcomers to Canada feel that they are part of the Canadian family by extending a warm hand of welcome whenever they can,” said Minister Sgro.

For further information on Canada’s Citizenship Week, including citizenship ceremonies open to the public, and how you can get involved in promoting citizenship in your community, please visit the “What’s New” section of Citizenship and Immigration Canada’s Web site at http://www.cic.gc.ca. You man also visit http://canadavisa.com for further info on immigration to Canada.

2. Temporary Work Permits – Mexico, France and the Philippines Send More Foreign Workers to Canada

In the first quarter, the flow of foreign workers changed little compared to the same period of 2003, dropping 1% to 18,034 people. While some changes in rank occurred, the top ten source countries for foreign workers were the same as in the first quarter of 2003. The United States continued to rank as the leading source country, with 3,140 entrants in the first quarter. This represented a decline of 15% compared to the same quarter of 2003, and 17% of all foreign worker entrants. Mexico ranked second with 2,562 workers, a 4% increase.

Australia was the third largest source of foreign workers for the quarter. Canada took in 1,590 workers from Australia, a figure virtually unchanged from the same period in 2003. France ranked fourth overall, sending 1,450 workers, which represented a 23% increase over 2003. The Philippines continued a trend toward increasing prominence in foreign worker numbers, rising from seventh source country last year to fifth in the current quarter.

Quebec was the only province to increase its intake of foreign workers. The province took in 10% more workers, for a total of 2,978 in the first quarter. The city of Montréal was the destination of the greatest number of these entrants (2,120 people, or 71% of the provincial flow).

3. Criminal Record: Check criminal record before checking out Canada

A traveler was surprised recently when he was denied entry from the United States into Canada. The reason: Four years ago, he was convicted in the United States of driving under the influence of alcohol.

“I was put on the next plane back home. Sad, humiliating, and I think ridiculous,” says the man, who asked that his name not be used.

Actually, most countries bar foreign visitors with criminal records for some period of time. But each country has widely differing rules on what qualifies as a serious enough infraction to bar the door.

Canada’s rules generally apply to any indictable criminal offense, including drunken driving and shoplifting – offenses they can find on various criminal databases. Last year, Canadian officials refused admittance to 17,841 foreign visitors because of their criminal records, said immigration spokesman Jean-Pierre Morin.

But he adds that his country allows for rehabilitation. A foreign national with a single offense is deemed rehabilitated after 10 years. If at least five years have passed since your crime, you might be able to apply for rehabilitation by filling out a form; decisions are made on a case-by-case basis at the Canadian consulate. Details: www.cic.gc.ca.

The Law Firm of Campbell, Cohen

http://canadavisa.com



Find More Citizenship And Freedom Press Releases

Latest Church And State auctions

Church and State eBay auctions you should keep an eye on:

[wprebay kw=”church+and+state” num=”10″ ebcat=”-1″]
[wprebay kw=”church+and+state” num=”11″ ebcat=”-1″]

Free Capitalist Radio – Free Capitalist Radio


Free Capitalist Radio – Free Capitalist Radio
from Free Capitalist Radio
Price: USD 0
View Details about Free Capitalist Radio

Freedom Church – Lebanon, Indiana – Freedom Church


Freedom Church – Lebanon, Indiana – Freedom Church
from Freedom Church
Price: USD 0
View Details about Freedom Church – Lebanon, Indiana

Freedom is my religion

A response to politically correct atheists. BOOK OF VIDEO TRANSCRIPTS NOW AVAILABLE www.lulu.com You can download an audio version of this video at patcondell.libsyn.com Subscribe via iTunes at itunes.apple.com Website www.patcondell.net PETITION AGAINST SHARIA LAW IN BRITAIN ‪http
Video Rating: 4 / 5

Christopher Hitchens gives a speech at the Freedom From Religion Foundation after receiving an award. This is from October 12, 2007.

Tax Freedom Day in Canada

On Saturday, June 6 Canadians will celebrate Tax Freedom Day. This light-hearted music video points out the many types of taxes Canadians pay and how long they work to pay their total tax bill.
Video Rating: 4 / 5

This video is for educational purposes only. Attorney, Tom Cryer, won a unanimous NOT GUILTY verdict in federal district court defeating the IRS’s claim that Tom “willfully” failed to file federal income tax returns. Tom refused to file tax returns because the IRS could not show him any law making him liable for ‘filing’ a tax return.
Video Rating: 4 / 5