Home » 2011 » May (Page 8)

MEDIA ADVISORY: Secure Elements’ Discusses IT Security’s Evolution to Enterprise Vulnerability Management at GFIRST National Conference

MEDIA ADVISORY: Secure Elements’ Discusses IT Security’s Evolution to Enterprise Vulnerability Management at GFIRST National Conference










(PRWEB) April 1, 2005

HERNDON, VA (PRWEB) April 1, 2005 – Secure Elements, Inc. invites conference attendees and media to a presentation by the Secure Elements chief technology officer at the GFIRST National Conference in Orlando, Fla., on April 7th, 2005.

Dan Bezilla will explore how enterprise vulnerability management supports the mission of the federal cyber security incident response functions.

WHO:    

Daniel Bezilla, Chief Technology Officer, Secure Elements, http://www.secure-elements.com

WHEN:

Thursday, April 7, 2005, 1:30 p.m. to 3 p.m., EST

WHERE:

2005 GFIRST National Conference, Rosen Centre Hotel, 9840 International Drive, Orlando, Fla.

WHAT:

Enterprise Vulnerability Management: Beyond Patch Management.

Patch management has never been a completely effective – or efficient – solution for IT security personnel. Each time a new patch is announced, managers must race to install and test the patch, usually in a race against hackers hoping to exploit the vulnerability. In addition, patch deployment usually disrupts network and application activity for hours and sometimes days.

Daniel B. Bezilla, co-founder and CTO of Secure Elements, is an information warfare expert and his past experience includes testing sensitive federal government computer systems. In this engaging address, he will discuss alternatives to traditional patch management and how CLASS 5 Enterprise Vulnerability Management software improves overall network security and eases the burden of manually updating patches through integration and automation.

HOW:

Members of the media may contact Elizabeth Maybach at 703-287-7821 or emaybach@sheahedges.com to obtain more information or schedule interviews with expert sources from Secure Elements.

About Secure Elements:

Secure Elements is an enterprise vulnerability management leader, automating security remediation strategies and tactics across the entire enterprise, reducing business risk and IT management costs while improving systems performance and maintaining business continuity. Protecting mission critical and network infrastructure assets from both known and unknown attacks without limiting operational performance, the company rapidly identifies and intelligently responds to complex and diverse security incidents. Using real-time threat intelligence data and analysis, Secure Elements provides administrators with optimal security control across the enterprise. For more information, please visit http://www.secure-elements.com

Contact:

Elizabeth Maybach

SheaHedges Group

703-287-7821

# # #







Attachments


















Vocus©Copyright 1997-

, Vocus PRW Holdings, LLC.
Vocus, PRWeb, and Publicity Wire are trademarks or registered trademarks of Vocus, Inc. or Vocus PRW Holdings, LLC.







More National Security Press Releases

Test of Valid Classification under Constitution of India

Art 14 Declares “the State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the equal protection of the laws within the territory of India.

Thus Art 14 used the two expression “equality before the Law” and “equal protection of the law”

As such this right  was considered generally a negative right of an individual not to be discriminate in access to public offices or places or in public matter generally. It did not take account of existing inequalities arising even from the public policies with that kind of undertaking of the right to equality.

This first expression equality before the law, is a somewhat negative concept which is said to be have taken from English common law, is a declaration of equality of all person within the territory of India, implying there by the absence of any special privilege in favor of any individual. Ever person whatever be his rank or position is subject to the jurisdiction of the ordinary court. Prof. Dicey, explain the concept of equality as it operated in England said ” with us every official from the PM down to a constable or collector of taxes is under the same responsibility for every act done without any legal justification as any other citizen.

The second expression the equal protection of the law which is rather a corollary of the first and is to be taken from US, it is a more positive concept implying equality or treatment in equal circumstances.

These two expression under this article to make the concept of equal treatment a binding principle of State action .  The word Law in the former expression is used in a generic sense a philosophical sense, whereas the word Laws in the latter expression denotes specific laws. It has not explained this statement any further, but it means that equality for all is the law or standard norm of the land.

Equal protection of the laws is now being read as a positive obligation on the State to ensure equal protection of the Laws  by bringing in necessary social and economic  changes so that every one may enjoy equal protection of the laws and nobody is denied such protections.

Underlying Principle

As no human being are equal in all respect the same treatment to them in every respect would result in unequal treatment. For example the same treatment to a child as to an adult or to a physically challenge or healthy person, will result in unequal treatment.

Therefore the underlying principle of equality is: not the uniformity of treatment to all in all respect, but rather equal must be treated equally  while unequal must be treated differently.

But this does not mean the unequal treatment for all, while the later Article of this part ( Part III) especially Art 15 and 16,  equality not only prohibited unequal treatment but it also demands equal treatment. Therefore state must not only treat people unequally but it must also take positive steps to remove existing inequalities, especially those inequalities which treat human being less then human being.

Test of Valid Classification

This article forbids the legislature classification, but it does not forbid reasonable classification of person, objects and transactions by the legislature for the purpose of achieving specific ends. And differentia must have a rational relation to the object sought to be achieved by the Act.

There must be an nexus between the basis of classification and the object of the Act which makes the classification.

In Kedar Nath Bajoria V/s State of WB

It said

The equal protection of the Laws guaranteed by the Article 14 of the Constitution does not mean that all the Laws must be general in character and universal in application and that the  State is no longer  to have the power of distinguishing and classifying persons or things for the purpose of legislation.

In E.P Yoyappa v/s State of TN

Propounded a new approach to Article 14 in the following words:

Equality is a dynamic concept with many aspects and dimensions and it is cannot be cribbed, cabined and confined within traditional and doctrinaire limits. For a positive point of view equality is antithetic to arbitrariness.

In Maneka Gandhi v/s Union of India

Article 14 strikes at arbitrariness in state action and ensure fairness and equality of treatment, the principle of reasonableness, which logically as well as philosophically is an essential element of equality or non arbitrariness pervades Article 14 like a brooding omnipresence.

 

 

Hi, my name is Naveen Kumar Shelar. I reside in New Delhi, India currently employed full time as a Facility & Administration Professional .

I started out as a Executive Administration late in 2005 evolved into a Facility & Administration with time and now I’m into New office development and Planning . I am mostly involved in new office infrastructure planning, procurement development, execution, and operations, not only this but I love to policies and procedure drafting for office operations.

When I’m not working I am mostly into sports like Cricket or Chess. I’m also into movies and music big time. I love spending time at home on holidays with my mom, dad, wife Anu, daughter Shrishty, Siya  and my pet Ronny, chutki (Labrador) who is simply on his moves all the time to keep you busy at home 🙂

My father and my mother has been a great source of inspiration for my life.

Specialties: New office set up and it’s whole life cycle, in technology driven organizations. Competitive analysis, process compliance & improvements, policy and procedure drafting, legal Agreement drafting.

Article from articlesbase.com

Breaking The Chains of Religion: An Atheist In College! (Part 6)

Continuing my series on “Breaking the Chains of Religion”. This week I am discussing some of the challenges I faced as an atheist atv Aiken Technical College in Aiken, SC.
Video Rating: 5 / 5

This is my Final Invitation Guides, it’s a good strategy to use and the one I and other less-than-newb players used using Elder level armor, weapons, and items. For any armor or weapon questions: skiesofcrimson.com Bombardier Jewel is made with: Akito Jewel: 1 Flame Sac: 1 FlynMealPassReg: 1(eat in the Kitchen and talk to your Felyne) Guide Break Down: 1. Hit it until it falls asleep. 2. Lay barrel bomb+ 3. Repeat 1 4. Repeat 2 and use whetstone 5. Repeat 1 6. Lay barrel bomb+ but before setting them off, lay a trap to catch him. 7. Use Tranq Bombs 8. Use Farcaster to return to camp and prepare for the second Rajang. For the second Rajang you use the exact same strategy except you have the option of using your Flashbombs, and using Pitfall traps when he is enraged. Music— Rage Against The Machine – Freedom Bad Religion – Come Join Us Goldfinger – The City With Two Faces
Video Rating: 4 / 5

How was the government under the Articles of Confederation ineffective in dealing with national security?

Question by Tootsie: How was the government under the Articles of Confederation ineffective in dealing with national security?
How was the government under the Articles of Confederation ineffective in dealing with national security? How did the United States Constitution attempted to address the issue?

Best answer:

Answer by Monika K
It couldn’t tax or enforce laws. Therefore, it didn’t have much power over the states. The states could make up their own laws, but didn’t have to include important things like hospitals, fire department, or rodes. The Constitution was made so the national government could have more power, and to give the states less power. The Constitution enforced laws so security-like things had to be present. This way, the US could act more like a country.

Give your answer to this question below!

California San Diego County Driving Constitutional Rights Writ Mandamus Lawyers Attorneys

JAMES V. PEPIN, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES, Defendant and Respondent
Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division One
July 22, 1969

The Department of Motor Vehicles ordered Plaintiff (James V. Pepin’s) driver’s license suspended for his refusal to submit to any of the blood alcohol tests required by Vehicle Code, section 13353, after he was arrested by an officer who had reasonable cause to believe he was driving while drunk.  Plaintiff brought mandamus in the superior court to compel the DMV to reinstate his driving privileges.  The Superior Court of San Diego County denied the driver’s application for a writ of mandamus to compel defendant Department of Motor Vehicles to reinstate a driving license.  Plaintiff driver sought review the above judgment.

Issues:

Whether the trial Court erred in denying the Plaintiff Writ of Mandamus?
Whether § 13353 violate the driver’s right to equal protection?

Conclusion:

Pepin un-meritoriously asserts that because section 13353 does not permit an exception for “employment-livelihood” cases, similar to that of Vehicle Code, section 13210, he is denied the equal protection of the laws.  The issue is whether section 13353 arbitrarily discriminates against certain classes of persons who refuse to take the chemical test, as opposed to other classes who also refuse the test.  No discrimination exists.  No particular class of person is selected for suspension for refusing a chemical test.

The suspension is mandatory, not discretionary.  Pepin did not have a constitutional right to refuse to take the chemical test.

Hence the Court affirmed the trial Court’s Judgment.

Disclaimer:

These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group.  They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions.  The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content

The SRIS Law Group is a law firm with offices in Virginia, Maryland & Massachusetts.  The law firm assists clients with criminal/traffic defense, family law, immigration, civil litigation, bankruptcy & military law.  The law firm has Virginia offices in Fairfax County, Richmond, Virginia Beach, Loudoun County, Prince William County & Fredericksburg, Virginia.  The Maryland offices are in Montgomery County & Baltimore.  The Massachusetts offices are in Boston & Cambridge.  The New York office is in New York City.  The North Carolina Office is in Charlotte, NC which is in Mecklenburg County.  The California office is in Orange County, CA.

The law firm has more than 11 offices in Virginia, Maryland, Massachusetts, New York,California, North Carolina & India to serve the clients of the SRIS Law Group.

 

Article from articlesbase.com

FREEDOMS FOUNDATION RECEIVES TEACHER SCHOLARSHIP GRANT FROM STEWART HUSTON TRUST

FREEDOMS FOUNDATION RECEIVES TEACHER SCHOLARSHIP GRANT FROM STEWART HUSTON TRUST










VALLEY FORGE, Penn. (PRWEB) June 30, 2000

Educators from Pennsylvania and Georgia will be among those who benefit from an $ 11,000 grant to Freedoms Foundation at Valley Forge, courtesy of the Stewart Huston Charitable Trust, Coastesville, Penn.

The grant will provide scholarships to teachers from elementary through university level interested in earning graduate credit for summer workshops and seminars hosted by Freedoms Foundation.

Each year the foundation holds up to three summer workshops on historical topics. This year the topics include:

 The Heritage of Our Past Presidents (workshop)

 The Civil War: Eastern Campaigns (workshop)

 The Revolution in the Middle States (workshop)

The weeklong workshops provide participants with an in-depth perspective of the events and people that shaped our nation’s early history. Participating teachers develop full teaching units based on what they have learned for use in their classrooms.

“Our programs continue to make a significant impact on the lives of young people, directly and indirectly. By continuing our work with The Stewart Huston Charitable Trust, we hope to increase our outreach even more,” said Lt. Gen. Robert E. Kelley, USAF (Ret) president of Freedoms Foundation at Valley Forge.

A portion of the grant will be used to bring the summer programs to the foundation’s web site through the use of video promotions and other Internet tools. Teaching techniques and curriculum developed as a result of the programs also may be posted.

Freedoms Foundation at Valley Forge, with 29 chapters in 17 states, is among the nation’s premier organizations devoted to citizenship-based education and the promotion of responsible citizenship. Founded in 1949 by prominent American business leaders, Freedoms Foundation continues to conduct national awards programs that recognize excellence in education and civic involvement. The Foundation’s National Awards, Leavey Awards for Excellence in Private Enterprise Education, and Distinguished Awards programs have recognized more than 55,000 individuals and organizations since the Foundation’s inception.

Today, Freedoms Foundation hosts programs for more than 4,700 students from all 50 states. They participate in educational programs that include U.S. history, constitutional rights and citizens’ responsibilities, core values, and the private enterprise system. Freedoms Foundation also conducts graduate seminars and workshops for educators that study issues relating history to today’s problems, responsible citizenship, and the benefits of the free enterprise system.

For more information on Freedoms Foundation at Valley Forge, visit the web site at

http://www.FreedomsFoundation.com or contact the Foundation at 1-800-896-5488.

# # #


















Vocus©Copyright 1997-

, Vocus PRW Holdings, LLC.
Vocus, PRWeb, and Publicity Wire are trademarks or registered trademarks of Vocus, Inc. or Vocus PRW Holdings, LLC.







Church of Scientology Opens New Church in the Heart of Moscow

Church of Scientology Opens New Church in the Heart of Moscow











Russian government, religious and human rights dignitaries joined more than 2,000 Scientologists to mark the grand opening of the Russian Federation’s premier Church of Scientology of Moscow.

Moscow, Russia (Vocus/PRWEB) March 08, 2011

Commemorating this new Scientology Church, Mr. David Miscavige, Chairman of the Board Religious Technology Center and ecclesiastical leader of the religion, declared: “It has been said that Russia cannot be understood with the intellect, that it cannot be measured by any common standard and that it can only be believed in. Well, let Russia now believe this: The Church that now stands in Moscow possesses a technology that is all but synonymous with the human spirit. It is a technology to bring forth the goodness in people and the greatness they are destined to achieve. It is a technology that is both kind and strong. It is a technology for freedom and wisdom.”

Scientology established its first Church in the Russian Federation in 1993 after the fall of communism and has seen phenomenal growth in the years since. It has been recognized as a leading voice in the fight for universal human rights.

The new Moscow Church not only meets the needs of its growing congregation of Scientologists, but also serves as the center for all faiths to unite for community betterment and social improvement in the name of religious freedom.

The Church of Scientology of Moscow further coordinates the Church’s many humanitarian initiatives. The 65,000-square-foot building houses a Public Information Display presenting an introduction to all Church-sponsored programs, including those dedicated to drug education, literacy and human rights. The new Church also provides public conference rooms and an auditorium for religious community functions.

The Moscow Church already stands at the forefront of Russia’s greater human rights movement. It works in coordination with the internationally renowned Moscow Helsinki Group, founded by Ms. Lyudmila Alexeyeva. Ms. Alexeyeva is one of the original Soviet era dissidents to decry communist oppression. She is also the recipient of the European Parliament’s prestigious Sakharov Prize for Freedom of Thought. On the occasion of the Moscow Church opening, Ms. Alexeyeva stated: “For me, as a human rights advocate, all religions are equal in their rights. Your Church is particularly devoted to defending the freedom of belief not only for its own parishioners but for all religious people of any denomination.”

The Church’s religious freedom victories are now legend. Scientology’s landmark decisions before the European Court of Human Rights set the standard for religious rights in all 47 member states. In recognition of what this new Church of Scientology represents to religious freedom, Mr. Boris Nikolayevich Panteleyev from the Russian Federation’s Public Chamber stated: “The precedents you have set in the European Court of Human Rights regarding your Church are very important for all those who stand for religious freedom. Today all lawyers, religious scholars, human rights advocates and representatives of other faiths carefully study these texts, seeing in them hope for justice and protection from discrimination in our own land.”

Mr. Panteleyev, who presented the Church with a recognition commemorating its grand opening, continued, saying: “Scientologists work to see that all have the right to thought, to practice religion and to rejoice. You work to see that all people have the right to assemble, the right to establish and support their own churches and organizations; that they have the freedom to think for themselves and to the expression of their thoughts and ideas. These freedoms are the very manifestation of the individual spirit. So it is important that we rejoice today, for this is a glorious day in the name of freedom for all of Russia.”

Scientology’s Drug Free World initiative is but one of the Church programs now adopted by citizens of the Russian Federation. Among its foremost advocates is Dr. Victor Ivanovich Cherepkov, two-term State Duma Deputy, who said: “The drug industry has taken its toll on Russians for years. Until recently we had no solution that could prevent the problem. Your drug education is well recognized in Russia. We are already using your literature and your methods in the fight against drugs. In fact, these are widely disseminated throughout Russia. And it’s spreading for one reason only: it simply is working everywhere and anywhere.”

Dr. Cherepkov went on to say, “In the effectiveness of your anti-drug campaign, I see the wisdom of L. Ron Hubbard—the great teacher and philosopher. For he unlocked the human mind and human problems with knowledge, to free us from the wickedness of existence in the name of creation, perfection and kindness.”

With the new Church of Scientology of Moscow, so begins the next historic chapter for Scientology. It is a chapter that not only signifies a renaissance for the religion itself, but a new era for religious and human rights in Russia.

Under the guidance of Mr. David Miscavige, the ecclesiastical leader of the Scientology religion, the Church is undergoing an era of explosive growth. The opening of the Moscow Church is the second since the beginning of 2011, and the 20th to be christened in cultural centers world over, in just the last 5 years, including:


     the Church of Scientology of Melbourne, occupying a landmark estate in the cultural capital of Australia;
     the National Scientology Organization of Mexico, at the historic center of the nation’s capital, Mexico City;
     the Church of Scientology of Los Angeles, serving the largest congregation of Scientologists on Earth;
     the Church of Scientology of Las Vegas, in the fastest growing city in America;
     the Church of Scientology of Québec, in the cultural heart of French Canada;
     the Churches of Scientology of Europe, Brussels Branch, at the administrative center of the European continent;
     the Founding Church of Scientology of Washington, DC, which stands on “Church Row,” just blocks from the White House;
     the Church of Scientology of Italy, at the historic crossroads of Western civilization in Rome;
     the Church of Scientology of Nashville, in the songwriting capital of the world and Music City, USA;
     the Church of Scientology of Malmö, a landmark Church for Sweden and Scandinavia;
     the Church of Scientology of Berlin, a beacon of spiritual freedom near the Brandenburg Gate;
     the Church of Scientology of London, at the epicenter of the English-speaking world;
     the Church of Scientology of New York, on the pulse of the city, just off Times Square;
     and the National Church of Scientology of Spain, located in Madrid’s historic Neighborhood of Letters.

There are currently another 60 major Scientology Churches in design, planning or construction around the world. (For the complete list of new Scientology Churches, see David Miscavige: At the Helm in the Era of Expansion)

This same period of unparalleled expansion also saw:

     The restoration of the Church’s landmark religious retreat at its spiritual headquarters in Florida; (See The Landmark Fort Harrison Fully Restored)
     The establishment of the largest all-digital, print-on-demand publishing houses in the world to facilitate the broad dissemination of Scientology Scripture; (See Bringing Scientology to the World: World’s Largest All-Digital Publishers)
     And to forward its humanitarian programs, the opening of the Church’s new International Dissemination and Distribution Center. (See Church of Scientology Flips the Switch on 185,000-Square-Foot Dissemination and Distribution Center)

The Scientology religion was founded by author and philosopher L. Ron Hubbard. The first Church of Scientology was formed in the United States in 1954 and the religion has expanded to more than 9,000 Churches, Missions and affiliated groups, with millions of members in 165 countries.

###





















Vocus©Copyright 1997-

, Vocus PRW Holdings, LLC.
Vocus, PRWeb, and Publicity Wire are trademarks or registered trademarks of Vocus, Inc. or Vocus PRW Holdings, LLC.







More Freedom Of Religion Press Releases

Q&A: When will Obama inact his plan for a civilian national security force?

Question by Meet Reality: When will Obama inact his plan for a civilian national security force?
“We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we’ve set. We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.”

Also, What is the purpose of this? Can we afford to add $ 664 billion dollars to the budget for this purpose?

Best answer:

Answer by JimSock
We’ll have to wait for all the political bruises from Health Care to heal and the Gulf Gusher to stop.

For now, look for CAP & TAX to make a run.

Give your answer to this question below!

New York Suppress Motion Driving Under Influence Constitutional Rights Denied Lawyers Attorneys

The People of the State of New York, Plaintiff, v. George P. Kelty, Defendant

District Court of New York, First District, Nassau County

June 30, 1978

 

Facts:

Defendant was charged with driving under the influence. Defendant made an omnibus motion to suppress a statement allegedly made by the defendant and the results of a breathalyzer test given to the defendant, on the grounds that it was illegally performed.

Issue:

Whether defendant’s Motion to suppress a statement should be allowed?

Discussion:

The court found that the police had probable cause for the arrest and there was enough evidence for the jury to find that the breathalyzer test was performed within two hours after arrest.  It is clear that there is no constitutional prohibition against giving such a test without defendant’s consent.  Thus, the right of refusal is not a personal privilege but an accommodation to avoid a distasteful struggle to forcibly take blood, breath or saliva.  It is a qualified statutory right whereby the defendant and police may avoid the unpleasantness connected with administering a test to an unwilling subject.  The People have shown the legality of the police action by satisfying the court that they had probable cause for the arrest and performed the test within two hours of arrest.  Since the defendant’s consent is deemed, the People need only show that the test was given, that it was performed after an arrest based upon probable cause and within two hours of that arrest.  In order to sustain his motion to suppress, defendant had the burden of going forward to show that the test was given, even though the defendant refused to take it.  This defendant has failed to do and has not met the burden necessary to suppress a chemical test which he claims he had refused.

Accordingly, the motion to suppress the chemical test is denied.

The court ruled that defendant had the ultimate burden of proving that the evidence should be suppressed. Further, the court held that the state showed the legality of the police action by satisfying the court that they had probable cause for the arrest and performed the test within two hours of arrest. Also, the court found that in order to sustain his motion to suppress defendant had the burden of going forward to show that the test was given, even though defendant refused to take it. The court denied the motion to suppress, concluding that defendant failed to meet the burden necessary to suppress a chemical test which he claimed he had refused.

Disclaimer:

These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group.  They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions.  The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.

The SRIS Law Group is a law firm with offices in Virginia, Maryland & Massachusetts.  The law firm assists clients with criminal/traffic defense, family law, immigration, civil litigation, bankruptcy & military law.  The law firm has Virginia offices in Fairfax County, Richmond, Virginia Beach, Loudoun County, Lynchburg County, Prince William County & Fredericksburg, Virginia.  The Maryland offices are in Montgomery County & Baltimore.  The Massachusetts offices are in Boston & Cambridge.  The New York office is in New York City.  The North Carolina Office is in Charlotte, NC which is in Mecklenburg County.  The California office is in Orange County, CA.

The law firm has more than 11 offices in Virginia, Maryland, Massachusetts, New York, California, North Carolina & India to serve the clients of the SRIS Law Group.

Article from articlesbase.com

Latest Freedom Of Religion News

Overcomers rely on Jesus to heal their addictions
NEW BEDFORD — The gentleman was a family man and prosperous New Bedford business owner, who lost everything to an addiction to alcohol. With nothing left to lose, he joined Overcomers, a Bible-based recovery and support group at Haven Baptist…
Read more on The Standard-Times

Bishop Salim Ghazal, champion of coexistence, dies age 80
Father Salim, the Catholic bishop of Sidon and a tireless advocate for peaceful coexistence and national unity, died Friday at the age of 80.
Read more on The Daily Star Lebanon