Dr. Chuck Baldwin Discusses Freedom Of Religion
Dr. Chuck Baldwin Discusses Freedom Of Religion
25 comments on “Dr. Chuck Baldwin Discusses Freedom Of Religion”
Leave a Reply
 |
Copyright © 2024. Liberty Walk. All rights reserved |
dex1142
June 5, 2010 at 2:17 am
And that is the stuggle. To practice our faith as best as we can without forcing it on others. As a muslim living in America there is no Sharia law, but I still have the freedom to pursue my faith and live within my religious obligations. I believe freedom of religion works but it has to be a collaborative effort and a constant effort as well.
LiquidSmooth
June 5, 2010 at 2:52 am
Protestants believe God is not a rapist, so to put a gun to your head and force you to worship God would go against what most of us believe.
But we do believe we have God given rights to life, liberty, and property, and that these rights, found in the 10 commandments, are rights given by God to all human beings, whether they acknowledge Him or not.
USA was founded, mainly by Protestants. All the basis for constitutional rights come from their bible.
This is why the Vatican has hated us
LiquidSmooth
June 5, 2010 at 2:59 am
That is currently what is promoted in this country. But it is incorrect.
Cause what if someone was a satanist. And wanted to sacrifice animals and people (even willing people).
Under protestant beliefs, you still have freedom to practice faith according to conscience, but there are limitations. While a protestant would never try to force you to believe, like a Catholic would, we still believe that God established rights and liberties, like “thou shall not steal”.
dex1142
June 5, 2010 at 3:51 am
Dont misunderstand me, I am a devout muslim and have a deep faith in God. However, I was always raised that Freedom of religion means to be free to practice your faith AND being free from having another’s faith imposed on another AND freedom from persecution for having a different faith. That is my definition. Would agree?
LiquidSmooth
June 5, 2010 at 4:12 am
@dex1142
Again, read my previous comments. To have absolute rights, one must acknowledge who God is. If you say no one can know for sure who God is, then in essence you say one cannot know their true rights.
ANd if you say “Evolution created all this by accident” then there are no rights, because evolution is a mindless process that had no design in mind, therefore there is no wrong or right way. If it had a design in mind, then you could determine if things worked towards or against it.
dex1142
June 5, 2010 at 4:18 am
Ahh, but as we have expanded on the idea of ” all men were created equal” we can do so with Freedom of Religion. Dont forget that the country founded by Christians but built on the backs of Muslims, Wiccans, and other indigenous believers.
InfidelAntichristian
June 5, 2010 at 4:25 am
Freedom of Religion is a lie.
In the business world If I asked for every sabbath day off from work I would just be replaced with someone willing to be more cooperative to the needs of the business.
There is no laws put in place to protect religious beliefs in the job world otherwise their would be lawsuits on a daily basis.
LiquidSmooth
June 5, 2010 at 5:04 am
Something that is created from the result of an ACCIDENT, as in evolution, no one can say if it is working right or wrong, because the thing which created it in the first place, no no foresight in mind behind its creation.
Evolution believes we came from a mindless universe by random chance (an accident). So therefore you cannot declare a right or wrong, it is all opinion.
LiquidSmooth
June 5, 2010 at 5:46 am
Excuse my sleepiness from my last message.
THeory of the State of Nature and Natural Rights, is based on presumptions and opinion, not facts.
You cannot find an absolute reason for right or wrong, without a faith based perspective.
God is truth. God is also the designer. ANd only the designer can declare its creation’s designed purpose and intent. One the Designer declares that, if it isnt working according to that design, it is working WRONG, and if it is then it is working RIGHT.
vikingskald
June 5, 2010 at 6:12 am
One does not have to believe in God to say we have a Right. Though one would have to believe in God to believe in God Gven rights,
Seneca the Younger, a Roman Stoic Philosopher, pointed out that while a man may be physically a slave in his mind he can imagine in his own mind as much Freedom as he logically could.
The Theory of the State of Nature and Natural Rights is pretty much a non-religious basis for the Doctrine.
I do not prefer faith based arguments when it comes to our rights.
LiquidSmooth
June 5, 2010 at 6:13 am
You may be correct. But it was more than just them that contributed to the Founding of this country.
But they did right, in the Declaration of Independence, that are rights come from God.
But to say we have a right, we must know God first, or else how can you know God gave us any rights or what those rights are?
vikingskald
June 5, 2010 at 7:00 am
Bullshit. Thomas Paine, Franklin and Jefferson, and the Adams were not Christian. They were Diest.
LonesomeArthurJames
June 5, 2010 at 7:27 am
Separation of Church and state means just that. All religions does not just mean all denominations of Christianity. When the Constitution was written less than 10 percent of the population were active members of a church. Freedom of Religion also means Freedom from Religion. When a contemporary church tells it’s members who to vote for, they are a PAC, and they should lose their tax exempt status.
xlanciferionx
June 5, 2010 at 8:02 am
The IRS should be dissolved for the greater good. I haven’t seen one instance where they were worth the money it costs to keep them going.
LiquidSmooth
June 5, 2010 at 8:26 am
If we had freedom of religon in the context of what the ACLU believes, we would lose all our rights, cause this country is founded on the principle that we have God given rights, that we can know who God is and what His will is through studying the Bible. But when you claim you dont know what the true God is, then you allow government and man to TELL you what your rights are and thus stand in jeopardy of losing all rights. Opens the door for Abortion, eugenics, ethinic cleansing, taking property
LiquidSmooth
June 5, 2010 at 9:19 am
Freedom of Religion by the definition of the Founding Fathers, means freedom of denomination, because they believed the only true Religion was the CHristian faith. False religions were not religions at all in their eyes. That is why many state constitutions said a state canidate must believe in Jesus CHrist. And no founding father protested this, so obviously it didnt go against what they thought was freedom of religion
maulhoik
June 5, 2010 at 10:17 am
I’m not an athiest but I’m not a literalist either. ALL diety conceptions are metaphor. So I support these folks. They have more common sence that most Christians. They understand the need to evolve.
BlackLookingGlass
June 5, 2010 at 11:00 am
A Non-theist here.. I support Baldwin and Nader, but Chuck got my vote for two reasons.. 1. He is more of a strict constitutionalist, and 2. statements like this calmed my views of him being overly theocratic.. If he didn’t make his views on religious freedom crystal clear, I wouldn’t have voted for him. Third party candidates don’t have a good chance, but one vote is no less real than any other vote. It’s our duty to take part, and use our minds.. Screw the establishment. Revolt will come..
1n354a
June 5, 2010 at 11:23 am
If those regulations are removed then so should be the tax exempt status that churches enjoy.
jblaz1024
June 5, 2010 at 11:44 am
Chuck is a true constitutional Conservative, i want this man as my pres
2connection
June 5, 2010 at 12:43 pm
He is for Freedom of all religion !
BALDWIN 08
judas486
June 5, 2010 at 12:46 pm
odd he only mentioned christians and jewish not islam hinduism and buddism the other real religions that make up ~41% of persons i wont include chinese church because that is a state church forced on its people
wildabeast11235
June 5, 2010 at 1:44 pm
good government? there is no such thing.
tedezak
June 5, 2010 at 2:24 pm
If you end the IRS and the 501-things then this problem goes away. Freedom of religion is sacrosanct and no government should be allowed to interfere. But if religious organizations go after the tax-free stuff then they open themselves up to abuse and regulation. God helps those who help themselves and religoous organizations should extracate themselves from the government and their restrictions. Cancel the IRS.
Sicklesale
June 5, 2010 at 2:38 pm
Atheists for Chuck!