Home » National Security » SA@TAC – National Security?

SA@TAC – National Security?

How government’s constant excuse of protecting “national security” makes us less secure and harms the nation.

Posted on January 6, 2011 by , 25 comments
Posted in National Security and tagged as , ,

25 comments on “SA@TAC – National Security?”

  • lushfauna

    January 6, 2011 at 11:34 am

    T.S.A – Touch Someones Ass………………………………………………………….. So what do you do for a living- Oh I feel up nuns a little kids and sweaty fat people all because of staged terror attacks from the Neocons and the zionist. It all makes perfect sense.
    WE ALL KNOW- What other 3 letter agencies are a absolute complete waste? Hmmm, I’m sure everyone here could think of a few.

  • delquattro

    January 6, 2011 at 12:12 pm

    An internet kill switch for the president? Liberals haven’t thought far enough ahead to imagine a Republican president with this power that is being pushed through by their Marxist leader. Proving, yet again, liberals are morons. Conservatives, on the other hand, are not happy about a president from either party having this power.

  • ALittleBitPregnant

    January 6, 2011 at 12:16 pm

    National Security, the last refuge of a scoundrel!

  • ALittleBitPregnant

    January 6, 2011 at 12:36 pm

    National Security, the last refuge of a scoundrel!

  • ludwiggy69

    January 6, 2011 at 1:27 pm

    national security is a threat to national security

  • nomadak47

    January 6, 2011 at 2:22 pm

    Friends we are headed to civil unrest, civil war, secession, or something. This Federal push to take away our liberties is a festering sore. Law breakers at every turn, czars, policing the world, lies, spend-spend-spend.

    Come Lord Jesus.

  • JimmerSD

    January 6, 2011 at 2:26 pm

    He already has the kill switch.

  • badtown88

    January 6, 2011 at 2:29 pm

    @ChangeBeginsWithYou

    Rand Paul for President? Really? Ron Paul I’ll give you but we don’t even know anything about Rand Paul’s record yet.

  • BankofSpirit

    January 6, 2011 at 3:15 pm

    very very good, thank you!

  • yeomalt2

    January 6, 2011 at 3:54 pm

    We will soon have a 50 agent US Border Patrol station at Port Angeles, WA.

    The USBP has dictated to our local “news” papers that a media blackout on local USBP arrests must be in place due to national security concerns.

    Elsewhere in Washington State- USBP arrests are not subject to a news blackout.

    I will attach a video here with news links on all of the above- or see it at my channel.

  • saw4fire

    January 6, 2011 at 3:57 pm

    Senator Joe Lieberman has a long history of masquerading as a “moderate”, while actually being one of the strongest advocates of bigger, more intrusive government.

    Senator Lieberman thinks he knows what’s good for us.

  • saw4fire

    January 6, 2011 at 4:13 pm

    Senator Joe Lieberman has a long history of masquerading as a “moderate”, while actually being one of the strongest advocates of bigger, more intrusive government.

    Senator Lieberman thinks he knows what’s good for us.

  • TRX450rYB240

    January 6, 2011 at 4:39 pm

    Ron Paul 2012 wake up sheeple

  • soavifox

    January 6, 2011 at 5:15 pm

    I hate the new bill. we just need a one line rule for the net. “no one company can make winners and losers on the internet” and be done. that would stop the comcast fiasco and we won’t need anything more. If the regulation takes more than one or two lines, its most likely there to fuck us over.

  • MrJeggus

    January 6, 2011 at 5:40 pm

    @ubetcha13 They’ll read it but not one of them will hear it!

  • ChangeBeginsWithYou

    January 6, 2011 at 6:09 pm

    Ron Paul/Judge Napolitano or Rand Paul in 2012. Wake the SHEEPLE up!

  • ubetcha13

    January 6, 2011 at 6:25 pm

    I seriously hope this new congress is actually new. I know they are going to open it with a reading of the constitution but I wonder if the dinosaurs up there can comprehend it anymore?

  • MrRiceowlex

    January 6, 2011 at 6:57 pm

    @Chad9976 There’s always Lieberman, formerly Biden, McCain with amnesty, Feinstein, my senators Hutchison and Cornyn..etc..etc…etc..They’re all pretty shitty with very few exceptions.

  • cowboy1165

    January 6, 2011 at 6:59 pm

    @JebBlack2010 National Security is akin to Fatherland Security. I wonder what massive crimes they will try to cover up in the near future.
    As always…Home run Jack!

  • CelticSouthland

    January 6, 2011 at 7:01 pm

    Obama is a COMMUNIST which is why he wants TOTAL CONTROL over the Citizen/Slaves of his Communist State.

    Why are some folks still afraid to say that Obama is a Communist?

    The Truth will always make itself known.

  • Clausfarre

    January 6, 2011 at 7:40 pm

    Bravo!

  • yostevoak1

    January 6, 2011 at 8:40 pm

    Demint uses national security all the time. He’s no more a man of liberty than Alvin Greene who I would have voted for all day long before that two faced Demint.

  • Chad9976

    January 6, 2011 at 9:34 pm

    Lindsey Graham = WORST. SENATOR. EVER.

  • 337noname

    January 6, 2011 at 9:46 pm

    National Security? No worries. Global warming sinks all boats.

  • Churchx77

    January 6, 2011 at 10:35 pm

    You just broke Godwin’s law. How does that make you feel?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *