Home » Posts tagged "Father"

Bono & Gavin Friday – In the Name of the Father

from 1994’s “In the Name of the Father” ST Come to me Come lie beside me Oh don’t deny me Your love Make sense of me Walk through my doorway Don’t hide in the hallway Oh love…step over I’ll follow you down I’ll follow you down In the name of whiskey In the name of song You didn’t look back You didn’t belong In the name of reason In the name of hope In the name of religion In the name of dope In the name of freedom You drifted away To see the sun shining On someone else’s day In the name of United and the BBC In the name of Georgie Best and LSD In the name of a father And his wife the spirit You said you did not They said you did it In the name of justice In the name of fun In the name of the father In the name of the son Call to me No one is listening I’m waiting to hear from you love Stay with me It’s cold in the ground But there’s peace in the sound Of the white and the black Spilling over I’ll follow you down I’ll follow you down I’ll follow you down It’s Wiki, but it’s starters: en.wikipedia.org
Video Rating: 4 / 5

Review from Part1 with added information, clarity. Fundamentals of Freedom. Court tactics
Video Rating: 4 / 5

John Locke — Father of the Enlightenment — Inspires U S Constitution

The social contract theory of John Locke provided the philosophy and source of governing authority for both U.S. Constitution and the Declaration of Independence. Jefferson borrowed freely from Locke’s phraseology.

John Locke laid out the social contract in the 5th paragraph of the chapter entitled “Of the Beginning of Political Societies” in his “Second Treatise on Government”.  There he states that the will of the majority is the only source of authority for civil government.  God and His law are ignored.

“And thus that which begins and actually constitutes any political society is nothing but the consent of any number of freemen capable of a majority to unite…this is that, AND THAT ONLY, which did or could give beginning to any lawful government…”  [John Locke, Second Treatise of Government (New York, NY: The Liberal Arts Press, 1952), p. 56].  This is the heart of democratic social theory — note the conspicuous exclusion of God and the ruling authority of His Word.

Under the Lockean model the people contract with one another to ordain a civil government.  God and His law are not Party to the Contract.  The Preamble of the U.S. Constitution clearly adopts this model:  “We the people of the United States . . . do ordain this constitution for ourselves and our posterity.” God is snubbed, and Article VI, Section 3 forbids requiring an officeholder to swear allegiance to God.

The Bible contradicts Locke’s ascription of power to the majority.  Romans 13:4 states that “…there is no power but of God.  The powers that be are ordained of God.”

Locke’s factionalized, pluralistic society is doomed to rip itself apart.  God judges the society that fails to acknowledge the supremacy of Christ.  Anarchy ensues.

Without the living and true God and His law there can be no justice.  But contrary to popular Christian opinion, the founding fathers never appealed to the Bible.  There is only one substantive reference to Scripture in the four-volume set of notes compiled from the Constitutional Convention.

The Federalist Papers, written in defense of the Constitution, make no reference to the Bible.  Having spurned God’s law, the founders were forced to employ Locke’s Social Contract and so-called natural law.

When Adam fell, he was expelled into a darkened world that fell with him.  Man’s fallen mind cannot correctly interpret the fallen creation. “For the creature [creation] was made subject to vanity, not willingly, but by reason of him who hath subjected the same in hope” (Rom. 8:20).  Looking for justice in the “law of nature” or “natural law” is an exercise in futility in a fallen world.

The Founding Fathers opened the door for their posterity to arbitrarily reinterpret the vague social contract articulated by John Locke.  As our current desperate plight indicates, the Constitution cannot shield us from social, economic, and political devolution.

<b>For More Information</b>

For more information about the anti-Christian features of the U.S. Constitution visit http://www.america-betrayed-1787.com/us-constitution.html Dennis Woods is webmaster and also a political pollster and fundraiser in Oregon. Copyright: you may freely republish this article, provided the text, author credit, the active links and this copyright notice remain intact.

Article from articlesbase.com

Find More The Constitution Articles

Jailed Father on Hunger Strike to Protest Denial of His Parental and Other Constitutional Rights

Dr. Amir Sanjari, was divorce after a 17 year marriage. He’s a UK Citizen who was originally invited to the United States to Stony Brook University, New York for a research position.

Now he’s destitute and on a hungar strike in jail to protest the unconstitutional denial of father’ rights and more.

Initially, Sanjari and his ex-wife shared equal custody of their children and had similar incomes. Nevertheless he was ordered to pay ,000 a month in child support. Such a payment is the first sign that something is seriously amiss.

But when he lost his job and applied for a reduction in ‘child support’, it was denied. This denial is also not unusual – wrong, but not unusual. His ability in the recession to get a job to cover the outrageous child support payment faded. It brought on hardships for him. Eventually his ex-wife won sole custody of the children, he says, by lying about him while he was out of the country on vacation.

Sanjari, a competent man, was not idle though. He learned the law to fight for his children and his rights to see them and care for them on his own. He fought in the Indiana family court, its district court, and eventually in federal courts. He had to go on the run to stay out of jail for not paying what he couldn’t pay – a common circumstance for fathers under such ‘child extortion’ orders. He spent time helping other parents with their family court cases while he was on the run.

Unfortunately, though well-versed in constitutional and federal legal processes, it became apparent that he’d get no due process to protect rights clearly denied to him. For the child support he couldn’t pay, he’s been sent to jail.

Amir is now on a hunger strike to try to expose his plight and that of other fathers under this tyrannical anti-father system that separates fathers from their children and turn them into criminals.

Sanjari hasn’t had any solid food since March 26, the day he was arrested. Once trim at 150 lbs, he’s now down to 115. He drinks some nutritional supplements with potassium and sodium to keep his brain functioning normally.

I stress that the constitutional denials Sanjari has had to face that set him up for his tribulations are not unusual for fit fathers under family court actions. Yet Amir’s personal sacrifice to garner some public notice is honorable.

The denials he faces are unjustified. He knows it, and many other decent fathers know it. And his efforts will in large part be suppressed by both the courts and all those who profit by the present day denial of fathers rights.

Fathers Rights means basic constitutional rights for a fit father to maintain physical and legal custody of his children to the same extent of a ‘fit’ mother – and then, of course, all other fundamental rights due a free person.

The denial of a fit father’s rights begin in a state’s county family court where his children are essentially kidnapped from him without the required constitutional due process to prove unfitness nor assigning him equal physical and legal custody of his children. The family court simply usurps all his rights by declaring that it will assign custody to one parent and make the other parent pay whatever it assigns as ‘child support’.

And why? Because the court claims it can deny fundamental rights based on it ‘alleged’ right to determine what’s in the ‘best interests of children’ who have fit parents. It’s an absurd claim when both parents are fit and willing to parent fully or at least equally to the other. It’s absurd because it’s unconstitutional.

But since, collectively, a multibillion dollar industry has grown up around the denial of a father’s rights because of the enormous benefits that can then accrue to them. Benefits include child support, collection fees, lawyers’ fees, GAL fees, course fees, extracted directly from fathers.

And then there are additional benefits from enormous government money transfer to family courts systems, state revenue agencies, domestic violence agencies and organizations, and federal revenue collections too.

Who supports this extortion industry?

Just follow the money. And with all that money comes plenty of propaganda to justify what happens based on extraneous reasons and vilifying men or fathers – but always steering clear of the clear constitutional rights violations that this system depends upon.

Unfortunately even the federal courts are afraid to over-rule the unconstitutional family court procedures and orders as is their duty when states’ procedures violate the U.S. Constitution. There’s just too much money and political push to make waves against the ‘divorce and domestic violence industry’.

That’s what Amir Sanjari found out – as other have too. What will you do when it’s your turn to go to court?

Shane Flait gives you the capability you need to fight for your rights.
Get his FREE Ecourse at http://FathersRightsLegalAid.com
Read his ebook: ‘Wise Way to Financial Independence’ =>
http://www.SovereignU.com

Article from articlesbase.com

Find More The Constitution Articles