Home » Freedom of Religion » Bono & Gavin Friday – In the Name of the Father

Bono & Gavin Friday – In the Name of the Father

from 1994’s “In the Name of the Father” ST Come to me Come lie beside me Oh don’t deny me Your love Make sense of me Walk through my doorway Don’t hide in the hallway Oh love…step over I’ll follow you down I’ll follow you down In the name of whiskey In the name of song You didn’t look back You didn’t belong In the name of reason In the name of hope In the name of religion In the name of dope In the name of freedom You drifted away To see the sun shining On someone else’s day In the name of United and the BBC In the name of Georgie Best and LSD In the name of a father And his wife the spirit You said you did not They said you did it In the name of justice In the name of fun In the name of the father In the name of the son Call to me No one is listening I’m waiting to hear from you love Stay with me It’s cold in the ground But there’s peace in the sound Of the white and the black Spilling over I’ll follow you down I’ll follow you down I’ll follow you down It’s Wiki, but it’s starters: en.wikipedia.org
Video Rating: 4 / 5

Review from Part1 with added information, clarity. Fundamentals of Freedom. Court tactics
Video Rating: 4 / 5

Posted in Freedom of Religion and tagged as , , , ,

50 comments on “Bono & Gavin Friday – In the Name of the Father

  • Mezmorizing Muzik

  • TheTechController

    January 18, 2012 at 6:40 am

    @Crazycupmuffin so how do you explain your God ‘concept’ to an atheist… I personlly have my logic but thats based on experience. The only thing that deters bad people from commiting crimes against humanity is fear of been caught, judged and punished. Now, without a believe of an afterlife.. your logic becomes a joke and bad people go about their business without a care in the world, particuarly if they are positioned above the law. So do you still feel safe???

  • TheTechController

    January 18, 2012 at 7:24 am

    @Crazycupmuffin sorry to break it to you… but you are now entering the mindset of solitude. Yes those people who drink by themselves for themselves.. where bad thoughts come to mind. You’ve obviously never struggled with depression or thought ill of other people just because they are happy. well I have, luckily I have supportive and loving family who helped pull me through, but for some people they dont.. and those thoughts become reality. You my dear are ignorant.

  • TheTechController

    January 18, 2012 at 8:09 am

    @Crazycupmuffin no tissue for my issue.. call me freak again and I’ll report your username to the Youtube Administration, might teach you to pull the head out of your backside and smell the real God dam roses. I wish the world were the teddy bears picnic you think it is but it’s not. It is vicious, cruel and to large degree without remorse. Good day.

  • @TheTechController ‘People should really think twice before killing’? are you serious listen to what your sayin you freak. Who thinks like that? People with sense dont ever think about killing anyone. You either have issues or your just ignorant.

  • TheTechController

    January 18, 2012 at 8:51 am

    @Crazycupmuffin lol… if you’ve taken anything from our tit for tat you might agree that I was saying the vitimised should have the right to decide whether a judgement killing is good for them or not. I personally may be more foregiving based on the nature. meaning that if it were a heatet outburst as compared to an organised killing without remose. then I may have a bit more anger and wish to make an example of the psycho. People should really think twice before killing

  • @TheTechController dont you have better things to do than tell people killing is good?

  • TheTechController

    January 18, 2012 at 10:22 am

    @Crazycupmuffin yeah your right.. pretty immature response, maybe we should meet up and cry into each others arms

  • @TheTechController thats your big response? Your obviously a 15 year old boy who has no idea what he is talking about if thats how you interact with people.

  • TheTechController

    January 18, 2012 at 12:07 pm

    @Crazycupmuffin sit on it and twirl

  • @TheTechController thats bull. Noone has the right to take a life, noone but god. And we are only humans. If someone murders someone they wll have to answer to god in life and in death, because this isnt all their is in life. Their is the afterlife, the thing that happens when we die. God will judge those not you and I.

  • TheTechController

    January 18, 2012 at 1:28 pm

    @Crazycupmuffin I used to believe such a thing but in nature it is fair for say that a victims family or loved one should decide the faith of the captive murderer. if they so please that they wish to execute the person well so be it but if they wish to let the person free well that too should be. however if this murderer were to kill again well then the orginal jury would be just as guilty because they are accountable. This is balance and the ruling of human nature.

  • TheTechController

    January 18, 2012 at 1:30 pm

    @duckdown1993 wise outlook… under such a circumstance 99 percent of people would bow down especially in the absense of organised leadership.

    so use your judgment of people sparingly. there is only strenght in numbers. its easy to foresse yourself as a brave, heroic leader sitting at a computer but if the actual circumstance were to arrise.. things may pan out a little different especially if no one were willing to back you up. catch my drift??

  • i am ADDICTED to this song.
    do you understand what ADDICTED means????

  • I am a human being

  • @Crazycupmuffin
    Oh shut up. You know perfectly well I’m not advocating that kind of behavior. Should reasonable steps be taken to ensure soldiers don’t get out of hand during wartime? Absolutely, but attrocities are committed in any war. The My Lai massacre doesn’t detract from the importance of fighting Communism. Personally, if I had a choice between living under Soviet rule or fighting a war were 1,000 My Lai massacres occured I’d choose fighting the war everytime.

  • @duckdown1993 i would never kill an innocent kid in a car bomb or rape women just for fun then shoot them in the back of the head in vietnam or gut out innocent people and pull their organs out in an order to insure they die slowly and show them their insides like the shankill butchers did. If you think there are causes worthy of doing these things then I truly feel sorry for you.

  • @Crazycupmuffin
    I hate to lean on the Nazi defense but sometimes extremes are the only examples people are capable of understanding. If the Waffen SS rolled into your town would you be willing to sacrifice your health, freedom, and life itself in favor of non-violence? If you were starving Frech peasant in the 18th Century would you take violence off the table? Maybe you would, but thats because you value submissiveness which I don’t think is a particularly noble trait to hav

  • @duckdown1993 self defense does not REQUIRE to kill if it comes to that it should be last resort. But to honestly say there is something WORTH killing for? is insane. there is no justification in this life for murdering innocent men women or children. You should be ashamed to even think such dark thoughts. The human race is one and the same.

  • @Crazycupmuffin
    Shut up. In many instances in life mere self-defense woudl REQUIRE killing other people. But besides that there’s also times when an idea or a cause may be worth killing for.

  • @duckdown1993 nothing is ‘worth’ killing for. To kill is the worst of all sins that can be realized in this existence. No person/s have the right to take any innocent lives or guilty ones.

  • Tiocfaidh Ar La

  • @niloh96 Actually I *DO* believe he’s the greatest actor living today! Look at both Gangs of NY & There Will Be Blood: there’s not a shred of his own personality in those characters, he actually becomes a different person entirely. DeNiro used to do that, hasn’t for a long time. Brando used to also. Postlethwaite got nom’d for an Oscar, probably should’ve won, matched DDL in every scene they shared.

  • One of the best soundtracks I’ve ever heard 🙂

  • MegaRichardharris

    January 18, 2012 at 7:14 pm

    I’m proud to be half Irish

  • @linkmaster667 anyone with any sense will get a second opinion, do their due diligence, formulate an opinion based on as much information as possible. Just sayin, disclaimers?? That is part of what ‘I’ want to be free from. I can take care of myself, “Please don’t deliver me from your fears”, thanks

  • @Goonabasec7 Yes, well, I take your point. If he did include a disclaimer, then I’m sure that would remove the necessary expectation that the viewer would rely on the information. I must have missed that though, if he did include it.

  • @linkmaster667 not if he says its for entertainment only and not to be considered legal advice. If you say that you can say whatever you want without legal reprecussions of course if you harm someones character you can be held liable.

  • Isn’t this guy liable to be slammed by a negligent misstatement suit if any one of the poor suckers buys into what he’s saying and gets jailed for thinking he’s not bound by the law? Seems kind of risky to go off spouting nonsense like this.

  • The word person gets it’s legal definition from the french word persona which is an actors mask so when saying you’re a person you’re really calling yourself an actor. A human being derrives from a person so also means actor explaining how you can perform so many roles. Blacks Law Dictionary thanks to the invasion of William the Conquerer 1066

  • @freemanitoba Hello, thanks for all the information. The question has been asked a few times “how does this apply to the US?”
    How does this apply to the us? It’s the same?

  • phonykingofengland1

    January 18, 2012 at 9:12 pm

    v. helpful, many thanks

  • sharlenemusiclover

    January 18, 2012 at 9:29 pm

    This is really good; I like it. Hey, check out my vids, Are You in Jail by Your Own Consent?; also, Barack Obama Admits All Govt. is by Consent….also, U.S. Citizens and the New World Order. I like your 21 day thang. My buddy Burt uses that, too. Good job. Check out Musicians 4Freedom. peace, VEn

  • @SoDrigh watch tarik bey videos , he tells a story of how one of his students stopped paying taxes by clearing up the assuptions he was preforming said function of gov. also never write and say my income is so and so , because income in blacks law dictionary is not what you think it is ,

  • @FreedomForYouAndMe because your gov. is a listed buisness on the stock exchange , so have you got a binding contract and did you have full disclosure to the contract -ie SIN , DRIVER LIECENCE , AS YOU DIDNT HAVE FULL DISCLOSURE CONTRACT NULL AND VOID , hope this clears this up for you

  • how to i get rid of my sin, do i just burn it or where do i go to deregister?
    and how would i get a job without a sin?

  • It applies in the US because our system is set up the same way. Commerce is universal. It’s the same here as in India and China and the UK.

  • @FreedomForYouAndMe As far as I know, noone. However, I will be using this exact approach in court real soon. I got a possession ticket, and the cop stole my pot. I want it back, so I will be covering the entire thing and putting it up on the channel. I have audio from when I went to the clerk, but do not know how to make vids yet. Learning that now. Subscribe, and you will get to see someone really putting all of this into practice. I am in Vegass, btw.

  • @mochooha Check my page. Over a hundred there for you. Or Google “Bursting Bubbles of Government Deception”

  • FreedomForYouAndMe

    January 18, 2012 at 11:24 pm

    @realskinnynews
    Thanks! Who is doing this in the US though? Have not really seen any videos about this here…just curious (I’m learning)

  • @FreedomForYouAndMe It applies the exact same way. There is no difference.

  • Dean, you might want to let people know about notices of non presentment and declaratory judgement of permanent estoppel. Cannot get those notices noticed without doing those afterwords. Notary public is a very powerful tool.

  • Cops are dumb. And now in Las Vegass, there is a new statute that says that they can tow your car if not registered. If its not registered, then its a red flag. No plates. Tow your car. THEN what do you do, when they steal your car?

  • @mrmitee where’s your video?

  • @mrmitee Hi Rob, Man I tried to write the truth that I feel in my heart over owner/holder and what you and Dean are saying, twice!?!? I can’t write right now*!**!
    Hey man would you care to do a show with Dean on freethinkradio with Cari-Lee, Please do consider; I personally would love to hear you two converse about the law. Contact her on Facebook
    Peace and Love
    How’s the Mosquito bite on your Hemi doing? LOL

  • He is wrong at the 7:58 mark where he states the BC is evidence of you being a share-HOLDER. It evidences that you are a SHARE OWNER, and that some other party is actually holding it. Thus the one holding it, actually has more power, for they are the ones who vote on company policy and collect dividends. Having been deceived once to wear a mask, will you remove it, or now try it on inside out or upside down, even though that benefits the deceiver, and they still hold your stock?

  • In USA they do come and kick in your door and do take you out.
    It has happened many times.
    REPUBLIC RISING ~ SLAVERY DEMOCRACY DEMISING

  • How do you get rid of your Social Insurance contract?? Do I have to get my long version of my Birth Certificate??

  • how would this apply to Canadians living abroad? e.g. in France or Germany.

  • very new to all this. But does that mean that because i have a licence and my car is insured, if i recieve a fine i will have to pay it because i played by their rules and was an employee if the government. in australia btw

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *