Home » Posts tagged "liberal"

Conservative vs Liberal vs Moderate, read carefully which are you really?

Question by Stanley: Conservative vs Liberal vs Moderate, read carefully which are you really?
Who ever here that said “CONSERVATIVE POLICIES THAT MADE THIS COUNTRY GREAT!” is speaking Hog wash! By the definition the conservative would first off never have left his european country for religious freedom, a true conservative would never had broke from the colonial power in which was controlling the colony. A conservative would never had wanted the average citizen the right to bare arms and allow them freedom of speech or a democracy. a True conservative by definition would never have wanted such “progressive changes”.

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/conservatism
Main Entry: con·ser·va·tism
Pronunciation: \kən-ˈsər-və-ˌti-zəm\
Function: noun
Date: 1832
1 capitalized a : the principles and policies of a Conservative party b : the Conservative party
2 a : disposition in politics to preserve what is established b : a political philosophy based on tradition and social stability, stressing established institutions, and preferring gradual development to abrupt change; specifically : such a philosophy calling for lower taxes, limited government regulation of business and investing, a strong national defense, and individual financial responsibility for personal needs (as retirement income or health-care coverage)
3 : the tendency to prefer an existing or traditional situation to change

The Liberal is what made it great.

Religious freedom: Liberal
Right to bare arms: Liberal
Freedom of Speech: Liberal

Main Entry: lib·er·al·ism
Pronunciation: \ˈli-b(ə-)rə-ˌli-zəm\
Function: noun
Date: 1819
1 : the quality or state of being liberal
2 a often capitalized : a movement in modern Protestantism emphasizing intellectual liberty and the spiritual and ethical content of Christianity b : a theory in economics emphasizing individual freedom from restraint and usually based on free competition, the self-regulating market, and the gold standard c : a political philosophy based on belief in progress, the essential goodness of the human race, and the autonomy of the individual and standing for the protection of political and civil liberties; specifically : such a philosophy that considers government as a crucial instrument for amelioration of social inequities (as those involving race, gender, or class) d capitalized : the principles and policies of a Liberal party

The bottom line is that if it was left up to conservatives we would still be a colony that was only allowed to worship one religion and would have to awnser to the king or queen. It was the Liberals that broke us away from that.

The Moderate

A bunch of stooges stuck in the middle who cannot make up their minds.
Main Entry: 1mod·er·ate
Pronunciation: \ˈmä-d(ə-)rət\
Function: adjective
Etymology: Middle English, from Latin moderatus, from past participle of moderare to moderate; akin to Latin modus measure
Date: 15th century
1 a : avoiding extremes of behavior or expression : observing reasonable limits b : calm, temperate
2 a : tending toward the mean or average amount or dimension b : having average or less than average quality : mediocre
3 : professing or characterized by political or social beliefs that are not extreme
4 : limited in scope or effect
5 : not expensive : reasonable or low in price
6 of a color : of medium lightness and medium chroma
oh and demecracy….Liberal
This is interesting indeed. However todays conservative is not yesterdays classic liberal. only in part. Todays conservative is still conservative, and adhears to the definition of conservatism.
However I see that both todays “modern conservative and modern liberal, both came from classic liberalism. Yet the conservatives adopted conservative ideals such as fear of change, and Liberals adopted a more social aspect. Amazing how simular they are, considering the social liberal is considered more cenrtral

Best answer:

Answer by Crow
Liberal

Know better? Leave your own answer in the comments!

Posted on January 2, 2011 by , 4 comments

How was the study of the liberal arts connected to the concept of education, freedom, citizenship, and public?

Citizenship and Freedom
by dbking

Question by Jess: How was the study of the liberal arts connected to the concept of education, freedom, citizenship, and public?
How was the study of the liberal arts connected to the concept of education, freedom, citizenship, and public service? Do you see a purpose in liberal arts education today?

Best answer:

Answer by Bottom Contributor
Liberals like to study things like art and basket weaving – because critical thinking escapes them

What do you think? Answer below!

Posted on December 12, 2010 by , 3 comments

Why are powerful liberal politicians so afraid of grassroots Democrats understanding “KELO VS NEW LONDON” case?

Why are they fearful of allowing grass roots Democrats understanding the significance of powerful politicians colluding with rich businesses and taking property from middle class families?

Will the Democrats suffer a hemorrraging of voters once regular Obama-voters undersand how his Supreme Court Jutice nominees will destroy their freedom?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kelo_v._City_of_New_London#Dissenting_opinions

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
On June 25, 2005, Justice Sandra Day O’Connor wrote the principal dissent, joined by Chief Justice William Rehnquist, Justice Antonin Scalia and Justice Clarence Thomas. The dissenting opinion suggested that the use of this taking power in a reverse Robin Hood fashion— take from the poor, give to the rich— would become the norm, not the exception:

“ Any property may now be taken for the benefit of another private party, but the fallout from this decision will not be random. The beneficiaries are likely to be those citizens with disproportionate influence and power in the political process, including large corporations and development firms. ”

She argued that the decision eliminates “any distinction between private and public use of property — and thereby effectively delete[s] the words ‘for public use’ from the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment.” 125 S.Ct. 2655, 2671

Clarence Thomas also penned a separate originalist dissent, in which he argued that the precedents the court’s decision relied upon were flawed and that “something has gone seriously awry with this Court’s interpretation of the Constitution.” He accuses the majority of replacing the Fifth Amendment’s “Public Use” clause with a very different “public purpose” test:

“ This deferential shift in phraseology enables the Court to hold, against all common sense, that a costly urban-renewal project whose stated purpose is a vague promise of new jobs and increased tax revenue, but which is also suspiciously agreeable to the Pfizer Corporation, is for a ‘public use.’ ”

Thomas also made use of the argument presented in the NAACP/AARP/SCLC/SJLS amicus brief on behalf of three low-income residents’ groups fighting redevelopment in New Jersey, noting:

“ Allowing the government to take property solely for public purposes is bad enough, but extending the concept of public purpose to encompass any economically beneficial goal guarantees that these losses will fall disproportionately on poor communities. Those communities are not only systematically less likely to put their lands to the highest and best social use, but are also the least politically powerful.[11]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Posted on July 5, 2010 by , 2 comments