Home » Posts tagged "protecting"

What’s more important to Democrats, protecting our national security or passing Obamacare?

Question by : What’s more important to Democrats, protecting our national security or passing Obamacare?
Considering the fact that Obama has stated that our homeland security system is broken and needs to be fixed, how much time and energy have Democrats spent on this issue?

How much time have they focused on healthcare?

Which is more important??
a) Obamacare
b) National Security

Best answer:

Answer by 2010 year of tax increases
A – Obamacare

What do you think? Answer below!

Michael Klim – Online Privacy Guide: Protecting your privacy is to protect your freedom. » Podcast


Michael Klim – Online Privacy Guide: Protecting your privacy is to protect your freedom. » Podcast
from Online Privacy Guide: Protecting your privacy is to protect your freedom. » Podcast
Price: USD 0
View Details about Michael Klim

When did leftists develop such a keen interest in protecting freedom of religion?

Question by Uncle Benito: When did leftists develop such a keen interest in protecting freedom of religion?
This seems to be a new development. Most of the people who are now preaching to us about freedom of religion as it relates to the mosque controversy are the same ones who are usually yapping about a mythical freedom FROM religion.

What are the chances this newfound respect for the First Amendment will still be their guiding principle the next time Christians or Jews are the ones whose religious freedoms are the ones being threatened?

Best answer:

Answer by Reparations for 40 yrs so far
only when they find a religion that hates whites or america

What do you think? Answer below!

Which is more important—national security against terrorism or protecting the rights granted to us in the Cons

Question by kendra r: Which is more important—national security against terrorism or protecting the rights granted to us in the Cons
Which is more important—national security against terrorism or protecting the rights granted to us in the Constitution?

Best answer:

Answer by jess
I would examine this quote from Benjamin Franklin

‘Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.”

he was a pretty smart guy : )

I think you have to decide if you want your country to be Run on the basis of fear of supposed evil ? Also if civil liberties are eroded what differences will there be left between the west and the areas we are meant to be be bringing the ‘light’ of democracy to ?

What do you think? Answer below!

Which is more important—national security against terrorism or protecting the rights?

Question by Lesley G: Which is more important—national security against terrorism or protecting the rights?
Which is more important—national security against terrorism or protecting the rights granted to us in the Constitution?

Best answer:

Answer by DAR
Rights.

He who would give up liberty for temporary safety deserves neither and loses both.

Add your own answer in the comments!

Q&A: Which do you feel is more important – national security against terrorism or protecting Constitutional rights?

Question by C.Diva: Which do you feel is more important – national security against terrorism or protecting Constitutional rights?
Which is more important to you (in your own poinion) – national security against terrorism or protecting Constitutional rights? Why?

Best answer:

Answer by Warren S
National security. With it you have some rights. Without it you can lose the biggest right that you have and that is your life itself.

Add your own answer in the comments!

Church of Scientology Decision Protecting Religious Freedom in European Court of Human Rights



Church of Scientology International


Los Angeles, Ca (PRWEB) October 1, 2009

Today, the European Court of Human Rights ruled unanimously in favor of two Scientology religious groups in Russia (European Court of Human Rights: Case # 7683601 and 32782/03), finding that they have the right to be registered as religious organizations under Russian law. This decision determines that members of the Church of Scientology of Surgut and the Church of Scientology of Nizhnekamsk have the right to religious freedom and freedom of association pursuant to Articles 9 and 11 of the European Human Rights Convention.

The Church’s human rights counsel, Bill Walsh, stated: “The judgment of the European Court of Human Rights today is a great victory for religious freedom in Russia and in all 47 member countries of the Council of Europe. The case is given the highest rating of importance by the Court itself as it effectively kills the repressive 15 Year Rule, denying religious organizations rights until they have existed in the country for 15 years. Moreover, the ruling will have great impact on countries throughout the European Community that have passed similar restrictions to repress religious freedom. So it is not only a victory for religious freedom in Russia, but for religious freedom everywhere in the Council of Europe.”

In 1997, the Russian government passed laws preventing religious organizations from forming legally unless they could prove they had been in existence in their respective state(s) for 15 years. Such a law obviously discriminates against religions not established in a state for 15 years and has now been ruled as unlawful by the European Court of Human Rights.

In reaching this decision, the Court “established that the applicants were unable to obtain recognition and effective enjoyment of their rights to freedom of religion and association in any organizational form. The first applicant could not obtain registration of the Scientology group as a non-religious legal entity because it was considered to be a religious community by the Russian authorities. The applications for registration as a religious organization submitted by the first and second applicants as founders of their respective groups… were denied by reference to the insufficient period of the groups’ existence. Finally, the restricted status of a religious group for which they qualified… conveyed no practical or effective benefits to them as such a group was deprived of legal personality, property rights and the legal capacity to protect the interests of its members and was also severely hampered in the fundamental aspects of its religious functions. Accordingly, the Court finds that there has been an interference with the applicants’ rights under Article 9 interpreted in the light of Article 11.”

Along with the recent decision of the Court in favor of the right of the Moscow Church of Scientology to be registered as a religious organization under the Religion law, these cases represent precedent-setting rulings that guarantee the freedom of religion and right of association for Scientologists and people of all faiths throughout the 47 nations that comprise the Council of Europe.

The Court concluded that “In the light of the foregoing considerations, the Court finds that the interference with the applicants’ rights to freedom of religion and association cannot be said to have been ‘necessary in a democratic society.’ There has therefore been a violation of Article 9 of the Convention, interpreted in the light of Article 11.”

The Scientology religion was founded by L. Ron Hubbard. The first church was established in the United States in 1954. It has grown to more than 8,000 churches, missions and groups and millions of members in 165 nations. The Russian Federation has more than 70 Scientology Churches and missions from St. Petersburg to Vladivostok.

For more information about Scientology, see www.scientology-moscow.ru, www.scientology.org.

###





Find More Freedom Of Religion Press Releases

Which is more important national security against terrorism or protecting the rights granted to us?

Question by ImmoralAmbulance: Which is more important national security against terrorism or protecting the rights granted to us?
Which is more important—national security against terrorism or protecting the rights granted to us in the Constitution?

Best answer:

Answer by oracleofohio
Protecting our freedoms, hands down.

“Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.”

– Benjamin Franklin

Know better? Leave your own answer in the comments!