Question by Griggnax: What would it take for Republicans/Conservatives to agree that Obama is good on National Security?
I’ve seen so many posts here that slam Obama as being weak on National Security, as being a pacifist, etc., that I’m wondering, what does he have to do to make you think otherwise?
Finally capturing or killing Bin Laden?
Stopping a high-profile attack on the homeland?
Something else?
And if something like that were to happen, would you give Obama the credit, or Bush?
Best answer:
Answer by Freedom Guy
let’s see:
– not attacking gun rights
– not releasing terrorists
– sealing the border
– maintaining order in iraq
– keeping iran from getting nukes
– responding with vigor to hamas, etc
– keeping bush’s 7 year streak of no attacks at home alive
– not weakening out military by allowing gays to serve openly
BTW, Bin Laden is a figure head and nothing more. I’d like to capture him, try him and kill him…. but that won’t stop the march of radical islam will continue to kill free people. only ignorant liberals believe this to be true. so, security-wise capturing bin laden means nothing.
Know better? Leave your own answer in the comments!
