This is Rep. Alan Grayson and Rep. Paul Broun discussing a bill to deny funds to one specific named organization in a Science and Technology markup. Such a bill is known as ‘a bill of attainder’.
Grayson v. Broun on the Constitution
Latest The Constitution Auctions
Hey, check out these auctions:
[eba kw=”The Constitution” num=”2″ ebcat=”all”]
Cool, arent they?
Latest The Constitution Auctions
Hey, check out these auctions:
[eba kw=”The Constitution” num=”2″ ebcat=”all”]
Cool, arent they?
Conservatives: where does it say in the constitution that business enterprise has the same rights as a citizen?
because that’s what every corporation is allowed to do here: if one forms a corporation, than that corporation, for legal purposes, can act as a citizen.
now where is that protected in the constitution? or is this more typical capitalist/conservative vitriol in adding stuff to the constitution that isn’t there?
NO WHERE IN THE CONSTITUTION DOES IT SAY COMPANIES CAN HAVE THE SAME RIGHTS AS CITIZENS!!!
@anthony: but at the same token, the government can’t just grant citizenship to non-living entities.
@mark: it’s a private institution, they can give aid to whoever they feel, if it’s non-profit.
Child Custody: Emancipation Handbook.
What Constitutes Emancipation And Releases A Parent From Child Support? Child Custody Affiliate Site: Http://www.custodylibrary.org/affiliate/index.html .
Child Custody: Emancipation Handbook.
David Souter vs. the Antonin Scalias
David Souter vs. the Antonin Scalias
It should become the philosophical shot heard ’round the country. In a remarkable speech that received far too little attention, former Supreme Court justice David Souter took direct aim at the conservatives’ favorite theory of judging.
Read more on Washington Post
Latest The Constitution Auctions
Hey, check out these auctions:
[eba kw=”The Constitution” num=”2″ ebcat=”all”]
Cool, arent they?
Latest The Constitution Auctions
Hey, check out these auctions:
[eba kw=”The Constitution” num=”2″ ebcat=”all”]
Cool, arent they?
If Rand Paul says the Federal govt should adhere strictly to US Constitution, why’s he against 14th Amendment?
Look at this:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/05/28/AR2010052802231.html
I can understand being against “anchor babies”.
However, how can one claim to be a strict Constitutionalist, and then contradict something explicit in the US Constitution?
