May God show us all the straight path, Ameen! The Miracle of the Holy Quran – Dr. Husain Sattar (graduate from University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, MashaAllah, Alhamdulillah) www.sacredlearning.org Science Islam www.scienceislam.com One of the Miracles of the Quran…
Video Rating: 0 / 5
Sponsor: FreeKeene.com – Is public defender putting on a dog and pony show to make Ed Brown’s trial look fair or is a real defense underway? That I don’t know, but I do know he made a listenable opening statement, that he won’t talk to me and that Ed Brown is a jailed tax protester on trial for trying to defend his home during a nine month standoff with Federal authorities. BTW I do not believe they wanted him dead, but I bet Brown thought so. Images and information from http How you can have a Ridley Report ad like the one in this vid: nhunderground.com ed elaine brown plainfield ridleyreport new hampshire tax deniers protesters resisters standoff waco ruby ridge bombs branch davidian feds federal authorities us marshals irs internal revenue service ron paul america: freedom to fascism guns weapons firearms free state project public defender trial court jail prisiondave ridley report reserve michael iacopino
RetSquid
February 13, 2011 at 2:31 am
@ClaasStoertebeker
“‘ll tell you that the law and tax professors know this shit . They can not teach it , by government dictate.”
That makes no sense at all.
ClaasStoertebeker
February 13, 2011 at 2:42 am
I’ll tell you that the law and tax professors know this shit . They can not teach it , by government dictate. Lawyers are only taught what the establishment wants taught. The legal profession has so much moral turpitude oozing from their pores That compared to a chicken house, that has not been for month’s, on a 100 degree day, makes it smell like a bed of roses..:)
As Shakespeare said very eloquently, “The first thing we do is hang all the lawyers…..;)))”
Tubeusercomm
February 13, 2011 at 3:39 am
The court ordered that the names, addresses, telephone #’s, e-mail addresses and Social Security numbers of every person who received materials on how to stop paying taxes be turned over to the government. The District Court issued an order holding We the People Foundation in contempt of court, imposing fines of $2,000 per day.
On May 5, 2008, Schulz filed a document with the court asserting that he had turned the material over to the United States attorney’s office earlier that day.
Tubeusercomm
February 13, 2011 at 3:58 am
Richard M Simkanin was found guilty of ten counts of willful failure to collect, account for and pay over taxes due; 15 counts of making false claims against the United States; and four counts of failure to file individual income tax returns.
The We the People Congress-Foundation including Joseph Banister showed up in force to battle the IRS.
Simkanin was sentenced to 7 years.
Richard Simkanin died in prison in late 2010, at the age of sixty-seven.
The WTP turkeys were a joke in court.
RetSquid
February 13, 2011 at 4:38 am
@xKenseixX
How about you show me which of their claims have a factual basis?
MrSupernova111
February 13, 2011 at 5:12 am
I turns out Joe Banister is a hoax. He willfully misled his client Thompson to not withdraw or report his employees taxes which landed Thompson in jail. However Joe Banister himself admits to pay his taxes which is why he is not in jail. Banister has written books and sells materials on tax evasion shelter information from which he reaps a large profit at the expense of the suckers that buy his materials and risk going to jail.
He is also rumored to be a mold for the IRS.
RetSquid
February 13, 2011 at 5:39 am
@xKenseixX
“[P]etitioner argues that the income tax is an excise tax and that petitioner did not engage in any taxable excise activities during 1996, 1997, and 1998. The contentions made by petitioner in his petition and on brief are appropriately termed ‘tax protester rhetoric and legalistic gibberish’, and we shall not dignify such arguments with any further discussion.”
Heisey v. Commissioner
RetSquid
February 13, 2011 at 6:22 am
@xKenseixX
From your site: “When a court refers to an income tax as being in the nature of an excise, it is merely stating that the tax is not on the property itself.”
Anything else?
RetSquid
February 13, 2011 at 6:50 am
“It is true that taxes of the kind referred to are excise taxes but it is also true, as was held in [Steward], that the excises which Congress has power to impose are not limited to vocations or activities which may be prohibited altogether or to those which are the outcome of a franchise, but extend to vocations or activities pursued as of common right. The term ‘excise’ is and was before and at the time of the adoption of the Constitution a term of very wide meaning.”
Abney v. Campbell
RetSquid
February 13, 2011 at 7:22 am
@xKenseixX
If you wish to think that excise taxes are only on privilege or on “doing some act” then you can also think that the income tax is is an excise on the receipt of your income. You act of receiving income is taxed. But th edefinition of ‘excise’ is broad enough to include taxes on income. Every court agrees on this issue.
RetSquid
February 13, 2011 at 7:34 am
“The Sixteenth Amendment declares that Congress shall have power to levy and collect taxes on income, ‘from whatever source derived’ without apportionment among the several states, and without regard to any census or enumeration. It was not the purpose or the effect of that amendment to bring any new subject within the taxing power. Congress already had the power to tax all incomes.
Bowers, Collector v. Kerbaugh-Empire Co., 271 U.S. 170, 173-174 (1926).
Tubeusercomm
February 13, 2011 at 8:15 am
@xKenseixX
Why do you pay your income taxes if you believe they are illegal?
Tubeusercomm
February 13, 2011 at 8:51 am
xKenseixX:
Let’s pretend that your legal fallacies are law.
Let’s say we believe you.
Now we need you to give us some legal advice on how to evade the federal income tax laws.
Tubeusercomm
February 13, 2011 at 9:45 am
xKenseixX:
Your rants are not the law.
You cannot cite ruling case law.
You have never won a failure to file case.
You pay your federal income taxes.
Your silly claims have been addressed by so many federal courts that they are no longer afforded the dignity of repeating the explanations as to why the claims are meritless.
Tubeusercomm
February 13, 2011 at 10:09 am
@xKenseixX
No one has to prove the negative.
You make the claims you prove them.
Cite your personal “failure to file” wins.
Tubeusercomm
February 13, 2011 at 11:08 am
@xKenseixX
Yawn! ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
Tubeusercomm
February 13, 2011 at 11:26 am
@xKenseixX
Cite your person “failure to file” wins or shut the fuk up
xKenseixX
February 13, 2011 at 12:19 pm
@Tubeusercomm You can also refer to thepriceofliberty (dot) org/04/04/16/greenslade (dot) htm
Please, I dare you to even attempt to disprove the information there. Please, by all means…since you’re so educated on this subject. Put me in my place. I’ll be waiting.
xKenseixX
February 13, 2011 at 12:20 pm
@Tubeusercomm There is nothing to “blow”. Simply don’t be an idiot and review the taxing clauses of the Constitution and the events that led to the adoption of the Sixteenth Amendment. The Constitution divides all taxes into two classes: direct and indirect. Article I, Section 8, Clause 1 grants the federal government its power to impose taxes.
Of course you’d agree with the government fascism of locking people away. Because Gov. is always right. Enjoy your fallacy moron. Learn to discuss.
xKenseixX
February 13, 2011 at 12:36 pm
@RetSquid thepriceofliberty (dot) org/04/04/16/greenslade (dot) htm
^
Disprove the factual evidence listed here. My points are taken from this. Do not bother me unless you can accurately disprove the evidence above. The 16th amendment didn’t add any new taxing powers, educate yourself.
xKenseixX
February 13, 2011 at 12:57 pm
@RetSquid As shown, this position is contrary to the Sixteenth Amendment that limited, not expanded, the taxing power of the federal government. If Congress is imposing federal income taxes on the erroneous assumption that the Sixteenth Amendment granted it the power to tax income directly without apportionment among the several States, then the tax is being unconstitutionally applied because it violates the restriction placed on the taxing powers of the federal government by the Amendment.
xKenseixX
February 13, 2011 at 1:45 pm
@RetSquid The nature of this “privilege” has been one of the most closely guarded secrets in American history. Neither the IRS nor members of Congress will identify the privilege. Instead, in letters and publications they have asserted that the 16th amen. granted the federal government a new power to impose a non-apportioned direct income tax on the people of the several States.
xKenseixX
February 13, 2011 at 2:31 pm
@RetSquid According to the CRS, the federal income tax is not a tax on income. It is a privilege tax measured by income. In other words, Congress is taxing some government-defined privilege and income is merely the measuring stick to determine the value of the privilege. Nowhere in this report does CRS identify the so-called privilege that is the basis for the tax. If the income tax is an excise or privilege tax, then what’s the privilege?
xKenseixX
February 13, 2011 at 3:05 pm
@RetSquid What does the court mean when it states that the income tax is in the nature of an excise tax?
An excise tax is a tax levied on the manufacture, sale, or consumption of a commodity or any various taxes on privileges often assessed in the form of a license or fee. It is a tax on doing something to property or on the privilege of holding some property or doing some act, not a tax on the property itself.
xKenseixX
February 13, 2011 at 3:42 pm
@RetSquid Direct taxes must be imposed on the several States according to the rule of apportionment. The 1980 CRS report also made the following statement concerning the nature of the income tax:
Therefore, it can be clearly determined from the decisions of the United States Supreme Court that the income tax is an indirect tax, generally in the nature of an excise tax.
In 1989, the Congressional Research Service revised and updated its report and discussed the nature of an excise tax;
TheJcp1234
February 13, 2011 at 4:40 pm
Yes Dave. We know what you look like.
indn178
February 13, 2011 at 5:26 pm
I would rather owe money to the Mob than to the IRS!
LeeKwangEng
February 13, 2011 at 5:28 pm
Please donate to peter schiff’s campaign w w w(dot)schiffforsenate(dot)com
Support him and spread the word out!
By the Way, This is a great Video!
Thanks for posting it!
playerhateroftheyear
February 13, 2011 at 5:34 pm
very good report. just makes me mad
littlebigefan
February 13, 2011 at 5:52 pm
sounds like alot of hearsay.if you’re going to report dave,report right ok?otherwise,find a hobby.you are a joke.
700eyesonly007
February 13, 2011 at 6:38 pm
Interesting.
Thank you for the fair and impartial update.
Jury nullification-learn your rights people…
anothervanmeter
February 13, 2011 at 7:22 pm
Thank you Dave, its apparent to us that are following this that they were out for the browns blood. What gets me is that they had snipers on the scene but claim to fire non leathal rounds at Danny Riley, like why would they tamper with the video footage from that day if they have nothing to hide.