Home » 2010 » July (Page 8)

Shunned by mainstream Muslims, Portland’s Ahmadi community treasures freedom to worship openly

Shunned by mainstream Muslims, Portland’s Ahmadi community treasures freedom to worship openly
Portland’s Ahmadi community, shunned by mainstream Muslims, worships openly, grieving fellow believers who died when terrorists attacked two mosques in Pakistan.

Read more on The Oregonian

National Security Adviser Jones Visits India Before Obama’s November Trip

National Security Adviser Jones Visits India Before Obama’s November Trip
U.S. National Security Adviser General Jim Jones is traveling to India this week to prepare for a visit by President Barack Obama in November.

Read more on Bloomberg

Grayson: “The Constitution Didn’t Contemplate a Standing Army, Much Less an Army Standing in Kabul”


This is Rep. Alan Grayson on MSNBC talking about the war in Afghanistan and Barack Obama.

Church: Cuba to free political prisoners

Church: Cuba to free political prisoners
Fifty-two Cuban political prisoners are set to be freed and will be allowed to leave the country, Cuba’s Roman Catholic church announced Wednesday in a written statement. It would be one of Cuba’s largest prisoner releases in recent history.

Read more on CNN

Billy Hayes – Defend Freedom of Religion Rally


Billy Hayes – (General Secretary – Communications Workers Union) Defend Freedom of Religion, Conscience and Thought Rally. 20th November 2006. Organised by BMI and Liberty. For more information, please go to www.bminitiative.net

National security involves more than securing borders

Erickson Column: National security involves more than securing borders

Jerry Erickson
Published: October 14, 2009

 

By now you’ve heard about Hosam Maher Husein Smadi. He’s the 19-year-old who was arrested on charges of attempting to blow up a Dallas skyscraper. The plan was uncovered when the F.B.I. became suspicious of Mr. Smadi.

As the N.Y Times reported on October 12, 2009, Mr. Smadi’s plan unraveled in 2008:

“But by the spring of 2008, he caught the attention of the F.B.I. by posting incendiary remarks about wanting to kill Americans on Jihadist Web sites. Over the summer, he met with agents posing as members of Al Qaeda and planned to bomb the Fountain Place office building in downtown Dallas, according to an indictment unsealed on Thursday.

His arrest on terrorism charges came after he parked a truck that he had been told was carrying explosives in the building’s underground garage, according to court documents.”

So, good work on the part of the F.B.I. However, what is also troubling about this case is the fact that Mr. Smadi apparently entered the U.S. on a tourist visa and had overstayed. Specifically, he had come to the United States from Jordan in early 2007 on a six-month tourist visa according to immigration officials. When he entered, he would have been given a date by which he was required to leave the U.S. The fact is that he failed to leave as required. Despite the fact that he overstayed, and that his visa had expired, this didn’t set off any type of process or alarm with immigration officials. Unfortunately, the simple fact is that despite the fact that we are more than 8 years post 9/11, the U.S. still doesn’t have a system to verify that foreigner travelers have left the U.S. as and when required.

As you can imagine, as the facts surrounding Mr. Smadi’s case have been revealed, there is now a rising chorus in Congress for Department of Homeland Security to develop an electronic exit monitoring system. Representative Lamar Smith of Texas, the senior Republican on the House Judiciary Committee, said the Smadi case “points to a real need for an entry and exit system if we are serious about reducing illegal immigration.”

Senator Charles E. Schumer, Democrat of New York and chairman of the Judiciary Committee’s sub-committee on immigration, said he would try to steer money from the economic stimulus program to build an exit monitoring system.

 

 

As all of us have seen when traveling, U.S. security has definitely been stepped up post 9/11. However, it is a huge gap in the entry/exit system that there are no biometric inspections, and/or process or system that would allow officials to monitor when travelers have left the U.S.

Officials have advised that establishing and implementing a monitoring program will be very expensive. Assuming this is the case, if we’re going to allow people into the U.S., we must be able to develop a system that effectively tracks when they leave. This is particularly so if the Obama administration is realistic about getting support for an immigration overhaul.

As to the particulars concerning Mr. Smadi, his ability to assimilate into U.S. life after overstaying is not a pretty picture.  After he decided he wasn’t leaving the U.S. as required, he was able to enroll in a high school, obtain a California identification card, secure employment with separate employers in two states, rent an apartment and a home, and purchase a gun and ammunition. Let’s just agree that there were no controls in place to see what Mr. Smadi was up to and leave it at that.

Mr. Smadi’s case is a clear reminder that there are people who would like to inflict more damage to the U.S. similar to that of 9/11. Having effective border security is obviously very important in the overall scheme of providing protection from those who would do us harm. However, it’s also critical to be able to monitor those who are allowed into the U.S. and then take timely and appropriate steps if they choose to overstay. Congress should immediately take up the issue of electronic monitoring and develop and implement a plan that addresses a problem that should have been dealt with years ago.

 

Jerry Erickson is the managing partner of Szabo, Zelnick, & Erickson, P.C. (www.szelaw.com), in Woodbridge, Virginia.  He is the senior attorney in the firm’s Business Immigration Section. He has practiced law for over 20 years and represents clients in numerous complex areas of immigration law. He can be reached at jerickson@szelaw.com or (703) 494-7171.

 

The above information is provided for informational purposes only.  The information should not be construed as legal advice and does not constitute an engagement of the Szabo, Zelnick & Erickson, P.C. law firm or establish an attorney-client relationship with any of its attorneys.  An attorney-client relationship with our firm is only created by signing a written agreement with our firm.

 

At Szabo, Zelnick and Erickson we approach everyday with the mindset that legal solutions don’t just happen by chance. Every case is unique and to achieve the best result a personal approach is required. Carefully analyzing the nuances of each case is not what should happen, but what must happen. The practice of law requires creative and precise legal representation and it has been this focus and mindset that has allowed us to proactively advise clients for over 30 years.

If you’re looking for legal counsel you can trust, we recommend that you contact our office and experience a distinct difference in legal representation.

the guitar necklace

Freedom of Information

One of the temptations of all government is to restrict Freedom of Information. It sometimes seems that the strongest Freedom of information legislation is always the first Act, introduced by a reformist government before it has secrets to hide. Freedom of Information is one of the most central cogs in integrity systems and should be seen as such. To fulfill this role, the rationale for restrictions should be rethought and the procedures changed to reflect that.

We see the key to reform in emphasizing that the information belongs to the public. It is not the property of the politicians. It is the property of the public they claim to represent and on behalf of whom they are governing. It would be a serious abuse of power to use powers given to them by information legislation to protect themselves from the judgment of the people. It would be an even more serious abuse of power to use legislation such an Official Secrets Act to block the release of information that reflects adversely on their performance or exposes lies that they had told in order to pursue a particular policy or to hold on to office.

This is not to say that there are not some valid reasons for withholding the release of information. However, the presumption should be in favor of release. Rather than requiring someone to apply for the release of information, most documents that get beyond a certain stage in the policy process should be posted on websites (this will incidentally save the cost of handling FOI requests) and all other documents should be available without review in a matter of days at reasonable cost. Those who want to withhold documents should have to justify this decision to an independent body. The body might permit classes of documents to be withheld subject to spot checks of what was in those documents and subject to an FOI application from citizens for particular documents that they want (as is the case now).

It would be up to the official to initiate action to withhold information rather than up to the citizen to seek it. Such an approach would not only make it much easier to get information, it would help change attitudes to documents in government. It would be more difficult to withhold rather than release information and, for once, sloth and lack of time would be on the side of virtue!

Judicial Appointment

Judges perform a critical role in integrity systems. However, the reasons for the appointment of one judge over another are rarely public and sometimes partisan. There are four safeguards against ‘stacking’.

- The first is the possibility of appeal and reversal against decisions made – always a potential embarrassment as well as defeating the purpose of ‘stacking’. This safeguard is, of course, non-existent in ultimate appellate courts.

- The second safeguard is the tenure of judges. Even here there can be problems where judges can be ‘promoted’ to another court.

- The third is that judges are joining a collegial institution where the opinion of their fellow judges is important to them. This works very well where judges have been appointed by different governments with different preferences and, especially, where they have appointed individuals with strong independent views. However, where a government holds power for a long time, stacking becomes a real possibility and the abovementioned safeguards are neutered.

- The fourth safeguard is that their decisions and reasons given are public. While few members of the general public read them, barristers do and judges are generally very keen to be thought to have integrity and ability by those who appear before them. This may seem ironic given the formally obsequious way in which barristers address the bench in many jurisdictions. However, in spite of this, or perhaps because of it, they appear very keen on the respect of their former peers.

Reforming judicial appointments is extremely difficult. Unfortunately, the power to appoint judges is much prized by Attorneys-General and governments. However, an attorney or government that bequeathed an improved system with a judicial commission to consider criteria, recommend appointments, provide judicial education, and recommend on disciplinary action, would be most valuable and in some jurisdictions, critical.

Latest Church And State Auctions

Hey, check out these auctions:
[eba kw=”Church and State” num=”2″ ebcat=”all”]
Cool, arent they?

Property Tax Appeals – Property Tax Reduction.

Engage In A Property Tax Appeal? Lower Your Property Tax Once And It Continues For Years. Consumer Reports Report 40% Of The Population Is Over-assessed! Some Say Higher. Step-by-step Specifics, Percentages And Numbers To Use Maximize The Win!
Property Tax Appeals – Property Tax Reduction.

Does Amnesty give illegals citizenship or just freedom from prosecution?

ALSO, does it mean that we can send them BACK to “THEIR COUNTRY”?

We need to move and realize THEY ARE NOT CONTRIBUTING TO THE REVENUE BUT USURPING ALL OUR TAX DOLLARS & OUR JOBS!
I know that NOBODY is but SOME OF US ARE and we are far from NOBODY. WE, my friend, ARE AMERICANS!