Home » 2010 » July (Page 6)

2007 National Security Medal (English Version) Part 1


2007 National Security Medal (English Version) Part 1

Obey The Constitution – or What? 3/30/07


March 30, 2007. Public domain federal band music accompanies video of We the People Foundation [givemeliberty.org] sponsored a “Right to Petition” Vigil with 50 plus “V for Vendetta” characters who came to say “Obey the Constitution or Else.” One protester showed to remind them — or else we’ll obey the Declaration of Independence’s urgings to “alter or abolish” government. Recognize the background music??

Constitution of the United States of America

The Constitution
Image taken on 2003-07-31 08:52:25 by The U.S. National Archives.

Kate Hudson – Defend Freedom of Religion Rally


Kate Hudson (Chair of CND) Defend Freedom of Religion, Conscience and Thought Rally. 20th November 2006. Organised by BMI and Liberty. For more information, please go to www.bminitiative.net

Ming Campbell defends Freedom of Information


Liberal Democrat Leader Ming Campbell has launched an online campaign to defend the Freedom of Information Act after Labour and Conservative MPs voted to exempt themselves from the Act. Website: ourcampaign.org.uk

What do you think of this…?

GREEDY LIBERALS AND GENEROUS CONSERVATIVES
By Rick Roberts
I want Conservatives and Christians to NOT give to charities this Christmas. That’s right! I want Conservatives and Christians to stop donating… but with ONE exception:Anything to help the military is fine!I’ve given this a lot of thought, and I believe that the right thing to do this Christmas is NOT to give…Don’t give to Father Joe. Don’t give to the Salvation Army. Don’t give to homeless shelters. Just don’t give. Now, many of you may already be cutting back on your giving this year… And you maybe feeling guilty about it.But I’m here to tell you… DROP THE GUILT. You ARE doing the right thing by not giving. Do not feel guilty about keeping your money for you and yours.Now, here’s why I’m asking Christians and Conservatives NOT to give this holiday:I’m just trying to wake people up. I’m not trying to be mean, or heartless, or cruel. I’m just trying to get people to open their eyes. When you get hit up for charities this Christmas Season, MOST of that money goes into either:A) The pockets of people who run the charities, or:B) Drug addicts and deadbeats on welfare who have done nothing to contribute to their own lives, let alone society.When you think of that bell ringing outside the department store, I want you to think of the soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan who sacrificed everything for your freedom…And think of all those men and women coming home without limbs, with shrapnel in their bodies who have seen their friends die in the battlefield.And then I want you to compare that sacrifice to the bum sitting on the roadside. I want you to think of Rosie O’Donnell, Sean Penn, and all the other pompous Hollywood actors who call you names just for being a conservative. You know, the ones who slam our troops at every opportunity. The ones who accuse them of evil. The ones who accuse President Bush of being Hitler and accuse our troops of committing genocide and random acts of violence. My take on giving is this: Give to those who have actually done something for this country and NOT to the ingrates who are nothing more than a leech on our great nation.And if that, for whatever reason, just doesn’t make sense to you, how about this:GIVE TO YOUR OWN FAMILY. The economy is a drag. People are down on their luck. But not everyone gives up and buries their sorrows in a bottle. Some people actually work harder, try harder, study harder… Give to these people. Help those who are trying to help themselves.Besides… Obama will soon come to the welfare crowd’s defense. Which brings me to my third reason not to give to charities this holiday season: Politics.You are going to wish you kept some of your money for yourself and your loved ones come tax season. That’s when our new President’s uber-welfare state is going to kick in…So you may as well start an Obama savings account now so that the welfare mom can have her new plasma TV.If you need another reason why Christians and Conservatives should stop giving, here it is:I’ve had ENOUGH. Haven’t you?I’ve had enough of the liberals and their name-calling.I’ve had enough of the attacks on churches, Mormon temples and Jewish Synagogues. I’ve had enough of their hatred and spouting that our God doesn’t exist.Did you know that – even though liberal families’ income averages 6% higher than that of conservative families – conservative households give, on average, 30% more to charity than the household of the opposite politcal belief?• That’s $1,600 per year vs. $1,227.• Conservatives also donate more time and give more blood. • Residents of the states that voted for John Kerry in 2004 gave smaller percentages of their incomes to charity than did residents of states that voted for George Bush. • Bush carried 24 of the 25 states where charitable giving was above average. • In the 10 reddest states, in which Bush got more than 60 percent majorities, the average percentage of personal income donated to charity was 3.5. Residents of the bluest states, which gave Bush less than 40 percent, donated just 1.9 percent.• People who reject the idea that “government has a responsibility to reduce income inequality” give an average of four times more than people who accept that proposition. • And another good example of liberalism… In 2000 Vice President Al Gore’s charitable contributions, as a percentage of his income, were below the national average: He gave 0.2 percent of his family income, one-seventh of the average for donating households. But Gore “gave at the office.” He said he used his public office to give other peoples’ money to government programs and therefore he was being “charitable.” If Barack Obama wants to spread the wealth around, he needs to start digging in the pockets of the liberals. We’ve got to even out the playing field.Conservatives MUST stop being suckers. Seriously, just stop!Obama and the liberals need to start throwing all their support behind the drug addicts and bums on the street.Want to know where MY m

DVD on U. S. Constitution Exposes the 3 Signs of Historical Revisionism Among Christians

“Ismellarat — An Anti-Federalist Interpretation of American History”

is unique as an evangelical video production that challenges the U.S.

Constitution as a Christian document thesis held by many evangelical Christians.  Produced by a team of Evangelicals, it seeks to prove that historical revisionism could be a more serious problem among Christian authors than among secularists. 

<b>Baptized Federalism</b>

Readers of most contemporary authors on American Christian history are in for a shock.  The video challenges almost everything they’ve been taught about the meaning of American history.  The documentary takes issue with the “baptized Federalism” which is common to many of today’s “Christian America” authors.  It asserts that too often strong Christians have allowed their patriotism to cloud their biblical discernment on this vital issue.

Approximately 31 minutes in run time, this DVD challenges the prevailing opinion among Christians that the United States Constitution represents the epitome of biblical civil government. It explores why Patrick Henry and other strong Christians of the founding era opposed ratification of the Constitution so vigorously.

The legendary Patrick Henry argued almost single-handedly against ratification for 23 days in the Virginia Ratifying Convention.  Patrick Henry had better oratory, but Madison had better organization Many of his prophetic warnings have transpired: an imperial Supreme Court, two levels of oppressive taxation, a bloody civil war.  Plus an expansionist interpretation of the General Welfare Clause and the so-called Elastic Clause. 

The film reports why Patrick Henry rejected James Madison’s invitation to the Constitutional Convention itself with the pithy retort, “I smelt a rat.”  It answers the question, What was the rat that Patrick Henry “smelt”?  Includes interviews with radio personality Larry Pratt, Christian historian Dr. George Grant, and others. 

<b>Christian Revisionism</b>

Historical revisionism could be a bigger problem among Evangelical Christians than among secular humanists.  Here is evidence the film supplies for this assertion.  Some of the telltale marks of Christian revisionism include….

      1) Relying heavily on secondary evidence such as after-the-fact religious quotes and self-congratulatory statements by the founders and their Federalist cheerleaders.

      2) Downplaying primary source documents, such as the “Federalist Papers” and “Notes From the Federal Convention,” which almost never refer to the Bible in their discussions of civil government.  Then concluding that “the founders used the Bible as their great political textbook.”

      3) Ignoring the strong Evangelical and anti-Federalist resistance to the Constitution, which existed at the time of ratification.  Then “baptizing” the Constitution as the undisputed epitome of biblical civil government.   

Thus, the video suggests that many contemporary “Christian America authors are in reality promoting a form of Christian historical revisionism. 

For more information about the anti-Christian features of the U.S. Constitution visit http://www.america-betrayed-1787.com/us-constitution.html Dennis Woods is webmaster and also a political pollster and fundraiser in Oregon, using the Dog Catcher Campaign Strategy: http://www.america-betrayed-1787.com/gary-north.html

Second Passport & Economic Citizenship

Want to move to one of the Eastern Caribbean islands and begin a fresh life to enjoy it to the fullest? There are many factors which affect this particular decision but economic citizenship can be one of the main reasons to decide this option. The question arises here why to choose economic citizenship?

Through the program for economic citizenship in the region, foreign nationals are allowed to accept another citizenship by participating in a government sponsored investment program. For both personal and professional reasons, this can be a perfect solution for a number of reasons.

Participate in the program gives you a chance to put a seal on a commitment to seek change in your lifestyle, economic conditions, status and emotional quotient to look ahead, move forward and feel the new world as soon as possible by becoming a regular citizen of another country.

However, for participating in such program, you may have to pay a fee charged by the government of your preferred island or country. But, through this process, you would earn full citizenship with passport and voting rights. Sometimes, countries take a longer time in processing of second passports and citizenship claims. Also, they do not provide any guarantee of citizenship status. Therefore, it is important to do an elementary research and find out countries truly welcoming to new applicants.

Benefits of Accepting Second Passports

Second citizenship can be defined as a global insurance policy that facilitates any individual to enjoy the freedom, rights, and benefits of the dissimilar parts of two countries at the same time. It is quite helpful in small nations with not very promising economy and social conditions. In this way, people often find it easier to gain from the positive situations of another country.

By having a Second Passport, you can avail different benefits capital investment, wealth accumulation, and better social conditions, promising educational standards and others.

Myself webmaster of http://www.geraldassociates.com/ dealing in services Economic citizenship program, Second Citizenship, Instant citizenship, Independent immigration, Diplomatic passport, Investment immigration, Diplomatic passport immigration, Economic citizenship program, Dual Passport.

Compare and Contrast Canadian vs. American Constitution?

I was just wondering, what are the main differences between the Canadian and American Constitutions and what are some common aspects as well. I am talking about in terms of human rights, fundamental freedoms and equality rights, which are Sections 2 and 15 and 33 of the Canadian Constitution.

Piles of books

Freedom of Religion
Image taken on 2009-11-15 14:42:54 by Teemu Mäntynen.