25 comments on “National Security Presidential Directive 51”

• 

  fukprc

  July 6, 2010 at 2:15 pm

  nobody cares

• 

  blaster21996

  July 6, 2010 at 3:02 pm

  “Riddles in Stone” is the predates “esoteric Agenda”

• 

  bobbygnosis

  July 6, 2010 at 3:50 pm

  Section 14. c. calls for quarterly and annual assessment. I’m having a difficult time figuring out if these assessments are to be held before or after an emergency. That is, are these assessments to be held now – before the emergency? Or are they to happen after the emergency? If after then it seems clear that this document is for a long term declaration of an emergency. Which means that if, for whatever reason, an election were to be suspended (like the 08′) that’d be it for years.

• 

  swanngranny

  July 6, 2010 at 4:30 pm

  too late, dude … too late

• 

  swanngranny

  July 6, 2010 at 5:07 pm

  I’ve been almost SCREAMING the same thing since 9/11/2001!!
  O.M.G. I’ve said it a thousand times!…since I was a CHILD I knew that the USAF controlled the skies as far as intercepting hijackings, etc….there is an SOP for hijacked planes AND for “Hurricanes” (ie, Katrina) and our country’s leader is either an abysmal FAILURE or he’s an OBVIOUS TRAITOR! Pick one, but ya gotta go with one or the other….there IS NO
  “in-between” in this scenario…..

• 

  bitherwack

  July 6, 2010 at 6:00 pm

  As far as I see it, this is the most damaging attack on America that can be conceived. Protecting the Constitution features a couple of times, but as far as I can see it, this document is the most radically damaging to the Constitution of anything. I suspect Bush signed this without even reading it.

• 

  1tonykirk

  July 6, 2010 at 6:41 pm

  Check out (Google)
  “Esoteric Agenda” new 02/08.

• 

  Mike1977a1

  July 6, 2010 at 6:48 pm

  We have to understand that the view of the political elite is that we are so vunerable to a terrorist attack that they think they need anti-terror laws to protect the country.
  but because they are self-deceived they dont realise they are intrucing powers that will prevent internal dissent, that may dimimish their polical power.

• 

  StahrT

  July 6, 2010 at 6:57 pm

  well we can sit an talk all day. We have been singing this from the roof top for over a year. Now its emanate. Why does Congress not stop him. Why want media carry it. Citizens have to rise up now. Demand action. Before they turn the forces of Homeland and black water inward on us.

• 

  benedictrove

  July 6, 2010 at 7:04 pm

  There is real evidence, but you have to read and stay awway from Fox news, which you probably can’t do. Tell me: How did 4″hijacked” airliners stay for over an hour in US skies, including over the PENTAGON without being intercepted? Or even caught by security cameras at the Pentagon? Do you know what Standard Operating Procedure is for the Air Force? Probably not. People are ignorant that is why they beleive the 911 myth.

• 

  LadyGreenEyes964

  July 6, 2010 at 7:39 pm

  Until real evidence (not to be confused with the muddled reasoning that we have seen so far) says otherwise, yes, I do believe that it was Islamic terrorists that attacked us. Still, I am sure they appreciate your disbelief, since it helps their cause.

• 

  benedictrove

  July 6, 2010 at 8:21 pm

  yeah, well, they did 911, they’ll do something bigger next time. (Unless you still think it was “al qaeda” lol)

• 

  benedictrove

  July 6, 2010 at 8:50 pm

  yeah, well what area we supposed to do? Our representatives are useless, protest marches get ignored. They have slowly bought up all the media until there is no real journalism left, all the information is controlled by a few. They can do whatever they want and there is nothing we can do about it except take arms against them, and they have have considerably more resources (from OUR taxes) than we do.

• 

  chewbaca1989

  July 6, 2010 at 8:56 pm

  Americans, you are sovereigns! Government serves us and must consult with us for any change. If not the perpetrator are subverting the Constitution. And may be traitors subject to persecution. You cannot sit by and not protest.
  God Bless America

• 

  3theThird

  July 6, 2010 at 9:53 pm

  According to this the CPCC is to be formed and run by a senior Homeland Security official of some sort. Who that would be we don’t know. It’s actually the new CPCC created by Homeland Security that will be running things.

  We used to have an emergency government plan. This replaces all of that with this unknown CPCC as the ruling elite. Nice move Hitler.

• 

  Mooki2k6

  July 6, 2010 at 10:49 pm

  They were already in place. The National Emergency Act. They included the Congress. Kind of a “check and balance”. Not just ME telling YOU what to do, but you also having “say so” in it. THIS puts ALL of the power/plans in the hands of the president. Bush if you like or Hillary if you don’t. But that’s the issue. That’s what all of the fuss is about.

• 

  LadyGreenEyes964

  July 6, 2010 at 11:45 pm

  It still seems to me that this is only for use in the case of a serious, nation-wide threat, that would demolish the normal procedures (like what happened in the show, Jericho. Plus, there seem to be provisions that state the Constitution should still be followed. Still, there is room for abuse in far too many laws these days (such as the property seizure laws in drug cases).

• 

  mrmcgee210

  July 7, 2010 at 12:26 am

  the issue is that the president will ” against the constition” rule the other two branches of government. which would make him america’s first dictator

• 

  PostToastie

  July 7, 2010 at 12:33 am

  That would be ‘Pink Floyd’. This is from the album ‘Ummagumma’, glad you like it.

• 

  Rajhoul

  July 7, 2010 at 1:02 am

  Who is the artist that came up with this great peice of music ?

• 

  LadyGreenEyes964

  July 7, 2010 at 1:12 am

  Oh, I have seen a lot of it, and there is some cause for worry. However, I don’t see that allowing faster decisions in case of emergency is quite the same thing. As for the NAU, I am totally against it.

• 

  lindaklase

  July 7, 2010 at 1:43 am

  I used to think like you do. Rather than argue as I see so many people do I will give you a few topics to investigate if you have any interest in the above video and its content: the New World Order, the North American Union, the History of FEMA, and so much more. It’s not who’s right it’s what’s right for the US and Democracy. I truly wish there were no issue.

• 

  PostToastie

  July 7, 2010 at 2:31 am

  Would you like to vote for president or have the president cancel the election and appoint the next president? (much like Guiliani canceled the mayoral election in New York and appointed bloomberg as the next mayor)

• 

  PostToastie

  July 7, 2010 at 2:47 am

  The issue is that the president no longer needs to include congress in the decision to declare a national emergency, and when that does happen, the president alone becomes the leader of all three branches of government and can change the constitution as (s)he desires and can postpone elections indefinitely.

• 

  LadyGreenEyes964

  July 7, 2010 at 3:22 am

  So??? There are plans in place to make sure that our government doesn’t fall apart in case of a serious emergency/attack/whatever. What’s the issue?