Home » Posts tagged "Religion" (Page 8)

Religion and devotion, a make or break

What happens when people lack luck is they switch religion and accuse their previous creed for their misfortunes. Rationalizing the time and prayers they have devoted, opportunity is still bland, questioning the Lord, “Have I not served you, why the sadness and misfortunes on me?” For those who have experienced miscarriage and death within the family, some would blame the bible for it. Such a sad story about spiritual faith, hypocrisy and treachery. Heaven is to smiles, hell is to tears.

If you don’t plant a seed would you expect a harvest out of prayers? If prayers don’t  give it to you would you blame religion or “care for a switch?” To reiterate, can you expect white out of black? Who’s to blame?

Only a few are lucky enough to be born with the silver platters. There are larger number of people at the bottom searching for gold secondary to daily bread. Some would go to the church as perennial worshipers seeking for mercy and begging for fortune all for the sake of convenience for the body.

However, this is the real world. We do not depend everything to the Lord. We need to strive in searching and earning money in order to live. The same way, we do not pray for the fruits to fall down our mouths. We do not offer ourselves to God and rely on others fortunes. Evidently, most people would do crimes and use “need” as an excuse. Afterward, they go to church and pray for forgiveness.

“Give them a finger and they’ll a swallow a hand” and worry about forgiveness later. Anon, they go back to the church and seek for forgiveness hoping and thinking that God is so great, he so love the world, he will always forgive.

What happens when they lack luck is they switch religion and accuse their existing creed for their misfortunes. Rationalizing the time and prayers they have devoted, opportunity is still bland, questioning the Lord, have I not served you? Why the sadness and misfortunes on me? For those who have experienced miscarriage and death within the family, some would blame the bible for it.

However, there is what we call responsibilities intertwined upon birth. Perhaps we should ask ourselves if we were careful enough during pregnancy as it is a meticulous stage. Life is developing.

Based on experience, love is the most powerful prayer. If you love so purely and pray for it, it will be granted to you. So, should failures be blamed to God? We are still on earth, so alive and kicking. On the other hand, if love has a consequence to face parallel to hurting others, especially due to infidelity, than it is only due to covenance. Pronto, who is to blame?

Then finally, they found security in their new religion. As their notion dictates, pray, pray, pray… but death and misgauge rule over faith. Therefore, praying becomes a standard dictated by the norm and the society; more so, it is an outer cover to applaud of being a good person and a sense of belonging.

Not to question God’s heavenly, but why is there heaven and hell? Would killing infants and strangers be forgiven and use karma as an excuse? Who dictates karma by way? 

It is harder and progress is slower if there are commandments to matter to some. Who wouldn’t switch to a religion where freedom and power are inconsiderate? If they can’t attain glory from following rules and laws, why bear when they can steal thy neighbors’.

Let me clarify that the contradictions between the bible and practicality of law toward abortion are an endless tale. So to play safe, responsibility towards actions must be taken in great consideration. I strongly believe that the reason why the bible defies abortion is because sex is not only made for pleasure, but it is the main source of life. Therefore, why does a life have to suffer out of unpreparedness. There is no such a thing as it just happened by chance. Moving on, there is what we call orphanage.

Boundary is going, going, gone…

Is it not a sin to barge in strangers life, brain, past, present and future? Play with emotions like puppeteers moving puppets? If this is so, then transparently, law is unknown.

Ah, thou shall not steal, covet thy neighbor’s wife, so on and so forth. Hindering and annoying law. What is it for anyways? What makes life?

There is a story of a former catholic member diverting to another religion. She found convenience and  security after quite a long walk. By fate or not, her live in partner happens to be a former catholic as well.

Sooner, she decided to join his religion as she saw money and influence from the members. Alongside with it, she didn’t have to worry about food, rental fee and money. She just helps in cleaning the house and she got a vacant room.

After sometime, she and her live in partner legally got married to her new religion and in the catholic church as (XXX, name of religion), with all due respect for both.

Before and after their marriage, they unite amongst families from both sides in applauding to the world the support for the wife and the husband’s brother’s relationship. While the husband is chasing the ex girlfriend of his brother, the wife and the rest of the gang sell herself to anyone 24/7. Ironically, her brother-in-law is running after his ex girlfriend. And all of them are running after the ex girlfriend to the point of lambasting to slaughtery.

Such a sad story about wrong spiritual faith, hypocrisy and treachery.

If religion is to make or break, then why is change elusive? Can you teach old dogs new tricks overtime? Or vise versa, old dogs will teach you new tricks, which is even worse, out of security and power.

Religion is meant to be spiritual and solemn for the soul and guidance in life. It isn’t a bank of resources or advertising for power to rule the world as misused by its so called worshiper.

Moving further, is there reincarnation before death?

The beauty in life is equally distributed to all. It’s all a matter of appreciation and determination to be who we are and strive for what we want to become. Sometimes, it’s better to be content with our blessings and nurture them and let God lead the way so naturally about the future.

The search will never end as long as we keep on peeking our neighbors’ and lust what we see. I respect all religion as infants have no choice but to accept and live by the religion carried on by the parents. Can you say it is due to destiny?

Heaven is to smiles, hell is to tears. Besides, it’s easier to smile then to cry. So, be thankful for the blessings.

Email me: sally.socialmedia@gmail.com

ESL, News And Articles, Government Agencies, Advertising And Marketing, Brainstorming, Services

Article from articlesbase.com

Anderson Cooper 360, CNN, 4-16-2010 Christopher Hitchens and Tony Perkins on the US Federal District Court ruling that the “National Day of Prayer” as legislated by Congress is unconstitutional. Case was filed by the Freedom From Religion Foundation: ffrf.org The court’s opinion tinyurl.com
Video Rating: 4 / 5

Related Freedom Of Religion Articles

Nice Freedom Of Religion photos

Check out these Freedom of Religion images:

Holy Bible, dated 1885, antique gold lettering, leather and board, held together with dental floss
Freedom of Religion
Image by Wonderlane
120 year old Bible binding held together with dental floss, rusted metal clasps (120 years as of 2005). This bible was originally used in a Protestant church in Oklahoma, from a private family there. The page style is gothic.

We donated this Bible back to the church in Puerto Vallarta, Mexico. A 92 year old Seattle woman gave it to a friend who gave it immediately to me in West Seattle. She has family but no one is Christian.

As soon as it came into my posession I felt, despite the fine illustrations, unusually fine binding with metal claps and so forth, that it was to be returned to a church on the West Coast. Armed with the Web I went shopping for the right church. Someone paid a lot of money for this bible, and it should have a proper home, restoration, and care. It was too fragile, too fine, and too valuable when restored to be in my collection: I couldn’t keep it, shouldn’t and didn’t.

Searching in Google Image Search over fast internet connection on "Churches + West Coast" when I saw a photo of the Catholic Church in Puerto Vallarta with it’s crown of angels – I knew that was the place. Flying from Seattle to Guadalajara Mexico, I took the large old heavy Bible wrapped up in a clean white sheet in my suitcase. I stayed for a week with friends for my first visit to Mexico – Guadalajara is an old city and very beautiful – people took their time making beautiful architecture from stone.

From there with one of my friends I took a cosy and posh regular night bus from Guadalajara to Puerto Vallarta, Mexico, and rolled it in the suitcase down the long walkway from the oldest hotel in the city Rosita, to the church, several blocks away.

The friend with me was resistant to entering the Catholic Church as she is a different religion however I pursuaded her that I needed her help – which I did as it turned out because I do not speak Spanish. After holding Mass the prime priest’s handler agreed that the lead priest would speak to us about the treasure we wished to donate.

However he just zipped right by us without a glance. So we asked again. The kindest sweetheart of a priest with just the kindest eyes accepted the treasure which he said could be repaired. As a priest, he has seen it all in Puerto Vallarta. He was delighted to have it, and treated it with great respect and reverance. He thanked us profusely as my friend translated.

This shot was photographed on a sheet at our hotel room, laid out on a plastic table, photographed on the deck of the room right next to the sea. With the wind blowing I had to swiftly shoot the images and not many turned out.

The right to freedom of religion is sacred. Freedom of religion means any religion. But you gotta believe in it.

Photo of the Catholic Priest –

www.flickr.com/photos/wonderlane/1450042437/

AND AMERICA ———–HE WASN’T KIDDING
Freedom of Religion
Image by SS&SS
AND CHECK OUT THESE VIDEOS www.youtube.com/watch?v=rGYK8qyVaRU

AND THIS ONE www.youtube.com/watch?v=iuXxtg4M_z8

and to hear from a mulsim what this mosque is actually meant to stand for read this ———
www.faithfreedom.org/articles/jihad-articles/mosque-near-…

As outrage continued to build on Sunday over President Obama’s support for the mosque and Islamic cultural center slated to be built near the site of the 9/11 World Trade Center attacks, GOP leaders and presidential contenders backed the families who don’t want the complex built on hallowed ground.

On Sunday, Texas Sen. John Cornyn even suggested there could be political fallout over the president’s remarks in the midterm elections.

Obama is "disconnected from mainstream America" and voters this fall will "render their verdict," said Cornyn, who leads the GOP’s Senate campaign committee.

Obama’s support for the mosque was one of the leading topics discussed on the Sunday morning news shows. By early Sunday, nearly all of the major GOP presidential contenders had weighed in on the controversy:

* “Fact president refuses to face is the ground zero mosque is a political statement of radical Islamist triumph over world trade center,” former House Speaker Newt Gingrich tweeted on Saturday. “Over 100 mosques already in New York City… President Obama profoundly wrong in misrepresenting ground zero mosque. There is no issue of religious liberty. He won’t face truth.”
* Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin referred her Twitter followers to an article by two liberal Canadian Muslims who called the mosque a deliberate act of provocation. Palin’s tweet: “Mr. President, why are they so set on marking an area w/ mosque steps from what you described, in agreement with many, as "hallowed ground”?
* Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty, though he represents a relatively heavily Muslim state, rebuffed pleas from local Muslim leaders to back off his suggestion that the mosque would "degrade and disrespect" the Trade Center site, Politico reported.
* A spokesman for former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney cited both "the wishes of the families of the deceased and the potential for extremists to use the mosque for global recruiting and propaganda" in opposing it.

Republicans appeared to be on solid political ground in taking a position against the mosque. Nearly every poll on the issue has showed overwhelming opposition to the Islamic center plans, as well as profound doubts about the motives of those behind its funding.

A recent CNN poll showing that 68 percent of Americans oppose the construction of the mosque. A Pew poll found last year that 55 percent of conservative Republicans believe Islam encourages violence.

Moreover, leading Christian and conservative groups that form the base of the Republican Party have also loudly voiced opposition to the ground zero mosque. The Anti-Defamation League, a New York-based Jewish organization with a mission to fight anti-Semitism, said in a July 28 statement that another location should be found.

“In our judgment, building an Islamic Center in the shadow of the World Trade Center will cause some victims more pain — unnecessarily — and that is not right,” the statement, posted on the group’s website, said.

Debra Burlingame, whose brother Charles Burlingame was the pilot of the jetliner that crashed into the Pentagon, said the mosque issue was part of a larger debate about the “clash of civilizations.”

"I do ascribe to the ‘clash of civilizations’ theory now," Burlingame told Politico, referring to a much-discussed theory that Islam in its current state is a natural antagonist to Judeo-Christianity and Western civilization. She also is among the main voices questioning the funding behind the proposed mosque, and the intents of the imam behind it, Feisal Abdul Rauf.

She told Politico that Rauf has made statements supporting radical elements of Islam, and that the location was chosen to be provocative. She also slammed those, mostly led by New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg, who are defending the project under freedom of religion, saying, "That’s a Western concept."

"This is a different model," she told Politico, arguing that in the United States people "for generations had been raised on this concept of separation of church and state, and that you don’t trash someone because of their religion … but that’s not what we’re dealing with here."

"I think the challenge for us is enlisting the Muslims who have already bought into the American program and not adjusting" to Muslim culture, she added. For Burlingame, the issue is not political — she said she objects to the content as well as the form of efforts by Bloomberg and others to push back because the goal is "to shut you up."

The president, meanwhile, seemed to back off from his stronger statements Friday night at a Ramadan dinner at the White House.

During a visit to Florida Saturday, Obama said his support for the right of a Muslim group to build an Islamic center near the World Trade Center site isn’t necessarily an endorsement of the project.

“I was not commenting and I will not comment on the wisdom of making a decision to put a mosque there,” Obama said during a trip with his family to the Gulf of Mexico. “I was commenting very specifically on the right that people have that dates back to our founding. That is what our country is about.”

But on Friday, Obama seemed to offer unabashed support for the mosque as she spoke during an annual White House Iftar dinner, marking the breaking of the daily fast in the Muslim holy month of Ramadan.

“As a citizen, and as president, I believe that Muslims have the same right to practice their religion as everyone else in this country,” Obama said at the dinner. “That includes the right to build a place of worship and a community center on private property in lower Manhattan, in accordance with local laws and ordinances.”

White House deputy press secretary Bill Burton said Obama, in making his comments in Florida, “is not backing off in any way” from his statement at the Iftar dinner.

“It is not his role as president to pass judgment on every local project,” Burton said in an e-mailed statement to Bloomberg Businessweek. “But it is his responsibility to stand up for the constitutional principle of religious freedom and equal treatment for all Americans.”

Politico noted that Republican leaders have largely abandoned former President George W. Bush’s post-9/11 rhetorical embrace of American Muslims and his insistence — always controversial inside the party — that Islam is a religion of peace. The shift fits with traditional Republican attacks on Democratic weakness on security policy.

"Bush went against the grain of his own constituency," said Allen Roth, a political aide to conservative billionaire Ron Lauder and, independently, a key organizer of the fight against the mosque. "This is part of an underlying set of security issues that could play a significant role in the elections this November.

"George Bush made every attempt to reach out," said Rep. Pete King, a leading critic of the mosque project. "The Muslim community did not reciprocate, did not respond. After Sept. 11, some of them became entrenched and really didn’t know how to cope.

"Somehow the leadership in the community does not impel them forward to be more part of the community. That’s my reading of it," said King, who also notes that sensitivities involving the site are far deeper, and more real, than many are willing to recognize beyond the boundaries of New York

newsmax.com/

www.youtube.com/watch?v=mqjT9yLS1Ms

Mar 02 (71)
Freedom of Religion
Image by theloushe
Jay Ipson invites protesters into the museum to see a picture of himself as a boy, lined up for selection to be executed during the Holocaust. He credits God for saving him from death.

Latest Freedom Of Religion News

A time for reflection and rebirth
ADELAIDE”S church leaders deliver their messages for the weekend.
Read more on News.com.au

Comment on Looking Back on Sarawak Elections 2011 by looes74
Matsab, No, Taib would make sure Najib would mampus. That’s for sure. For me, I just wanna enjoy the show! Bean, Why everything got to be with western tainted glass? It’s Tianmen, I agree….Chill out man http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RPwDqFf4NJI&feature=related
Read more on Din Merican

Latest Freedom Of Religion News

Ambassador for key issue
Religious and tribal differences underlie much of the uncertainty about the future of the revolutions under way across the Mideast.For the United States the issue is particularly troublesome. We have supported the minority Sunni regime governing a large
Read more on The Scranton Times-Tribune

Spirit of bonhomie, peace at Faiz festival
KARACHI, April 17: A festive combination of thought-provoking seminars, art shows, theatre activities, dance performances, music concerts and quite a few extempore colourful happenings made the daylong Jashn-i-Faiz organised by the Citizens for Democracy at the KMC Sports Complex on Sunday an event to remember.
Read more on Dawn

Latest Freedom Of Religion News

Jurne
Freedom of Religion
Image by funkandjazz

Turkish PM attacks France for ban on full face veil
Turkish Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan accused France of violating the freedom of religion on Wednesday after Paris began enforcing a law barring Muslim women from wearing full face veils in public.
Read more on Reuters via Yahoo! News

Latest News
After a nearly five-year wait for a US ambassador to be appointed to Ashgabat, President Barack Obama’s nominee, Robert E. Patterson, a career foreign service officer, was confirmed unanimously without debate by the US Senate on April 14 as US ambassador to Turkmenistan, the Congressional Record reported.
Read more on EurasiaNet

When did leftists develop such a keen interest in protecting freedom of religion?

Question by Uncle Benito: When did leftists develop such a keen interest in protecting freedom of religion?
This seems to be a new development. Most of the people who are now preaching to us about freedom of religion as it relates to the mosque controversy are the same ones who are usually yapping about a mythical freedom FROM religion.

What are the chances this newfound respect for the First Amendment will still be their guiding principle the next time Christians or Jews are the ones whose religious freedoms are the ones being threatened?

Best answer:

Answer by Reparations for 40 yrs so far
only when they find a religion that hates whites or america

What do you think? Answer below!

Q&A: Does freedom of religion grant me the right to smoke cannabis?

Question by Christy: Does freedom of religion grant me the right to smoke cannabis?
Well, because of freedom of religion, Native Americans are legally able to use drugs like mushrooms and mescaline, because it is part of their religion. In the Christian’s Bible, Jesus says “and I give you all of Earth’s plants to use” or something along those lines, so does that give me the right to use cannabis? Thoughts?

Best answer:

Answer by Ozomba
Nope. Sorry. They closed that loophole years ago.

Add your own answer in the comments!

How could muslims demand for their freedom of religion and freedom of speech when?

Question by bluebird: How could muslims demand for their freedom of religion and freedom of speech when?
They give ZERO freedom of religion to other faiths in their own Islamic countries? How could they expect freedom of speech when they go on a killing spree for issues as silly as cartoons in their own Islamic countries? Why do they think their medieval cult is beyond mockery when ever other religion is mocked every single day? You don’t expect to treat a bunch of people who are ultra sensitive and go berserk at the slightest hint of mockery. they should learn to civilize themselves first and then demand for their rights

Best answer:

Answer by Splash RROD
It’s quite a kick in the balls, huh?

I’m glad they jailed that nut that made terrorist threats to the people that make South Park. It’s a freegin cartoon FFS!

Add your own answer in the comments!

Latest Freedom Of Religion News

On Libya, Ivory Coast, theological dissent, and Opening Day
Stop me if you’ve heard this before: There’s a pariah state someplace known for brutalizing its people and destabilizing its region. As cracks start to appear, the West turns up the heat in favor of regime change.
Read more on National Catholic Reporter

The Muslim Sisterhood – Visions Of Female Identity In The New Egypt
The women of the Muslim Brotherhood played a supporting role in Egypt’s revolution, and now they want to have a hand in shaping its democratic future.
Read more on Free Internet Press

Iranian Baha’i leaders hit by ‘vindictive’ sentence extension
The reimposition of 20-year jail terms on seven leaders of Iran’s Baha’i religious minority is “outrageous”, Amnesty International said today as it made a renewed call for their immediate release
Read more on Amnesty International

Religion in rousseau and locke

For many people, religion has an indispensable place in society. Its exact place in society however has largely remained debatable. For some, politics and religion are simply incompatible. Regarding religion and politics there are two extremes. One view simply seeks to eliminate religion out of politics. This view has several supporters even today; those who believe that politicians should stay away from religious issues, while pastors should stay away from political issues. It has had several supporters for a long time. John Locke was one of those who sought to draw a line between religion and politics. His is one of those positions that this paper will concern itself with. The other position is that seeks to marry religion with politics. This view as already indicated tends to go to another extreme. It nonetheless has been subject of great discussion within the field of rational thinking. Jean Jacques Rousseau is one philosopher who supported this kind of idea. So what is the point that these two are trying to make in their arguments? Why are their positions totally different?

Locke and Rousseau

The most fundamental question that one could ask is; what have these two philosophers to offer regarding the relationship between the state and religion? The greatest achievement that both Locke and Rousseau made was not so much that they offered models of ideal society, but that they brought into light some of the complex issues regarding the two most important elements of human life namely, religion and state. Both brought an exposition of the complexities involving the relationship between state and religion in a way that few have ever done. The fact that these things elicit serious discussions even today attests to their nobility of thought. They in other words ignited a flame of thought which several people today find delight in discussing. Even though both existed at a time when religion was still highly dominant, they were unafraid to express what they saw as the right way to follow. One might say, however, that one was only reacting to the thought system of the other. What seems to have been their most important commonality is in the area of tolerance. For Locke toleration means everyone is able to do what they consider right based on the fact that all are essentially free. For Rousseau toleration is seen in the light of religion and state interests. For him tolerance comes not only in religious matters but in both religion and state. “Wherever theological intolerance is admitted, it must inevitably have some civil effect” (Rousseau 8)

Rousseau considers that religion is totally crucial for the proper functioning of any society. The role of religion for him was to bring unity in the society. For him there are three kinds of religion. There is the religion that is pure and true, which focuses on the moral demands, and which can be rightly called natural divine law.  It lacks the physical elements typical of other religions. It involves the person in his relationship with God. There is also another kind of religion, which is particular to each country. This kind of religion is indicated by the state, and it comes complete with dogmas, and all the rites typical of a religion. The laws and dogmas governing this kind of religion are designed by the law. This is a civil kind of a religion. Rousseau calls this Civil Divine Law. Rousseau considers that governments were free to uphold such beliefs as eternal life. The last one is a bit difficult to follow. This is because it offers dual codes to those who subscribe to it. Christianity falls into this kind of religion. It preaches a life in a different world, thereby reducing this world into a lesser one. This religion is destructive of unity, because it leaves people confused and torn between following diligently the faith they profess and the citizenship that they allege. Any kind of a system that is destructive of the bonds of society is totally unacceptable. It is important therefore that people follow the second kind of religion because this religion brings about the marriage between the law and the divine. “The second is good in that it unites the divine cult with love of the laws, and, making country the object of the citizens’ adoration, teaches them that service done to the State is service done to its tutelary god” (Rousseau 8).

Locke sought to draw a line between the authority concerned with matters of this temporary world, and the world that is expected which is the spiritual. For him, the persons that are charged with the responsibility of guiding people in as far as the goods of this world are concerned should not claim to have the authority to direct people even in matters of non material eschatological world. This for Locke is informed by quite a number of reasons. First, God has apparently not given anyone power to determine the way of salvation for others, and this includes deciding for anyone which religion to follow. This is informed by the awareness that there is an abounding responsibility in every individual to seek after their own salvation. This is done in the freedom that is inherent in nature (Locke 10). He says that no one should give up their right to seeking individual salvation to the determination of the leadership of the country, or the judicial officers. “Now that the whole jurisdiction of the magistrate reaches only to these civil concernments, and that all civil power, right, and dominion, is bounded and confined to the only care of promoting these things; and that it neither can nor ought in any manner to be extended to the salvation of souls” (Locke 10). One cannot follow any belief whatsoever without fully being convinced mentally that this is the faith that will likely offer them salvation. Resigning one’s right to the whims of the judicial officers then would reduce the individual to a subject of the politicians. This would already take away the liberty that is at the core of human subsistence. Worth mentioning is the fact that even the judicial officers also have the responsibility of saving their own souls. The heart of any religion is actually deeply rooted in the full conviction of the believer that whatever they hold in their mind is exactly what is required of them by God and that that is what they should do. The power of the political leadership is entirely external.

The author is associated with examples of Research Papers. The author will assist you with  Religious Research Paper.

Article from articlesbase.com